Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Anti-Leishmania major activity of Calotropis procera extract by increasing ROS production and upregulating TNF-α, IFN-γ and iNOS mRNA expression under in vitro conditions

Tropical Medicine and Health volume 52, Article number: 16 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Leishmaniasis, caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Leishmania, is a neglected tropical disease with 700,000 to 1,000,000 global new cases annually. Adverse effects associated with expense, long-term treatment and drug resistance have made conventional therapies unfavorable, encouraging the search for alternative drugs based on plant products. In this study, the effect of Calotropis procera (Asclepiadaceae) extract against viability of promastigotes and amastigotes of Leishmania major was evaluated in vitro.

Methods

The extract from the leaves of C. procera seedlings was prepared using a methanol maceration method. The colorimetric cell viability 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to determine the growth-inhibitory effect of the extract on promastigotes. The level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in promastigote cultures was determined after treatment with the extract using the 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) method and compared with untreated cultures (control). After exposure to the extract the expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) genes were determined and compared to control in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) infected with L. major.

Results

Based on the MTT assay, the C. procera extract significantly reduced the proliferation of L. major promastigotes with IC50 values of 377.28 and 222.44 μg/mL for 24 and 72 h, respectively (p < 0.01). After treatment with 222.44 and 377.28 μg/mL of C. procera extract, ROS production in L. major promastigote cultures increased 1.2- to 1.65-fold and 2- to 4-fold compared to the control, respectively (p < 0.05). C. procera extract induced significant increases in gene expression of TNF-α (2.76–14.83 fold), IFN-γ (25.63–threefold) and iNOS (16.32–3.97 fold) in infected PBMCs compared to control (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

On the basis of its anti-leishmanial activity, C. procera can be considered as a promising new plant source for the potential treatment of leishmaniasis.

Background

Leishmaniasis is a neglected obligatory intracellular tropical disease, caused by different species of Leishmania parasites, that is prevalent in many parts of the world [1]. Leishmaniasis is transmitted by the bites of infected female sand flies [2]. These parasitic protozoans have two distinct stages in their life cycle: promastigotes (extracellular flagellated promastigotes in the gut of the female sand fly vector which can be injected into the host dermis by vector bite), and amastigotes (transformation of promastigotes into intracellular amastigotes after internalization by host phagocytotic cells through phagocytosis) [3, 4]. At the vector bite site, the parasite in promastigote form attacks host phagocytotic cells (inflammatory monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils) and then transform into intracellular amastigotes [4, 5]. Amastigotes are able to proliferate within monocytes/macrophages and transmit the infection to other macrophages, neutrophils, monocytes, some dendritic cells and fibroblasts [4, 6, 7].

The defense reactions of host cells against Leishmania infection are based on the co-ordination of two host immune systems, innate immunity (complement-mediated lysis) and adaptive immunity (Th1-mediated response) [4, 5]. The expression of activating cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α is essential for parasite proliferation control [8]. When activated by cytokines, host cells can suppress the infection by killing intracellular parasites [9]. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and Nitric Oxide (NO expressed by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) gene) represent as two major effective leishmanicidal molecules for exclusion of intracellular parasites without damaging the host cell [4, 5].

Treatment of leishmaniasis has always been challenging. The absence of effective immunizations and/or emergence of treatment resistance have all contributed to the rise in prevalence of this disease [10]. Pentavalent antimonials, amphotericin B, paromomycin and pentamidine are the most regularly used drugs for leishmaniasis therapy. However, they have significant side effects, require high dosages for extended periods of time, and are supplied parenterally [11]. An effective and economical new treatment approach would be advantageous in overcoming the difficulties induced by leishmaniasis chemotherapy. In the treatment of parasitic infections, phytotherapy has recently attracted attention as a viable alternative to chemotherapy [12]. In this regard, plant studies have been expanded to discover new secondary metabolites with increased bioactivity and fewer side effects [12, 13].

Calotropis procera (Asclepiadaceae) is a common plant throughout the world (growing mainly in dry and semi-arid climates), renowned for its conventional therapeutic uses including the treatment of infectious diseases, skin and dermal illness (infections, leprosy, wounds, psoriasis), respiratory diseases (bronchial asthma and cough), gastrointestinal diseases (dysentery, constipation and nematode infections), urinary tract diseases (kidney stones and chronic renal problems), jaundice, malaria, fever, earache, neuropsychiatric disorders, liver diseases and even tumors [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Recently, C. procera extracts have been reported to exert anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, gastroprotective, cardiovascular, antipyretic, antioxidant, antimalarial, anthelmintic, antifungal, anti-angiogenic, hypolipidemic, antibacterial, analgesic and anticonvulsant properties [14, 18, 20,21,22,23,24,25]. C. procera leaf extract has also demonstrated effective anti-leishmanial activity against promastigotes of L. tropica, mediated via a mechanism of apoptosis induction [26].

The mechanisms and pathways that stimulate leishmania-infected macrophages are of special interest since they hold potential for the development of new treatment and prevention strategies. In the present research, we sought to evaluate the effect of C. procera extract on PBMCs infected with L. major and the expression levels of INF-γ, TNF-α and iNOS genes. It was hypothesized that treatment of L. major promastigotes and amastigotes with C. procera extract would induce ROS production and upregulation of INF-γ, TNF-α and iNOS genes which could be effective for parasite control.

Methods

Preparation of plant extract

The seeds of C. procera were provided and cultivated in the greenhouse (Fig. 1) by Zarringiah Co., West Azerbaijan Province, Urmia, Iran. The growing seedlings were authenticated by a taxonomist. Voucher specimens (voucher numbers: CP/1397 433) were deposited in the Zarringiah Co. Herbarium, Urmia, Iran. The leaves of 6 weeks seedlings were carefully harvested for extraction (Fig. 1). After washing and shade drying at room temperature, the samples (500 mg) were powdered and extracted by 10 ml 80% methanol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) maceration method and shaking incubation at 25 ± 2  C for 72 h. The extract was paper filtered and the residue re-macerated for the second (80% methanol, 48 h) and third (80% methanol, 24 h) time. Finally, the solvent was evaporated in a vacuum rotary evaporator (Rotary Evaporator N-1110, Eyela, Tokyo, Japan). The concentrated residue was frozen at − 20  C. The dried powders were dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Cl2H3K2Na3O8P2, 1X, pH 7.4, Gibco, Paisley, UK) and diluted to prepare test concentrations of extract.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Seeds and seedlings of Calotropis procera

Full size image

Cultivation of Leishmania major parasite

The Iranian standard reference strain of L. major promastigotes (MRHO/IR/75/ER) was provided by the Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran. The promastigotes were cultured in RPMI-1640 culture medium (+ HEPES and L-glutamine, Gibco, Paisley, UK) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, PAN Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany) and antibiotics (100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA). The cultures were placed in an incubator shaker (120 rpm) at 25 ± 1  C and grown until reaching the stationary growth phase.

MTT viability assay

In order to determine the growth-inhibitory effect of C. procera extract, the promastigotes of L. major (1 × 106 parasites/mL) at stationary phase were added (triplicate) to the 96-well plate and treated with extract concentration range of 0–400 µg/mL. Wells containing culture medium without promastigote as blank sample, glucantime-treated promastigote (Glucantime®: Sanofi, France) as positive control and PBS-treated promastigote as negative control were used. The plates were incubated for 24 and 72 h at 25 ± 1  C. Tetrazolium salt 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) was dissolved in PBS (Gibco, Paisley, UK) at 5 mg/mL, added to each well (10% of the volume of well). After incubation at 25 ± 1  C for 4 h and adding dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA) to stop the reaction, the absorbance was read by plate reader (Stat Fax 2100 ELISA Plate Reader, Awareness Technology, Palm City, Florida, USA) at 545–600 nm:

$$\% {\text{ cell viability}}\, = \,\left( {{\text{absorbance of treated wells}}{-}{\text{blank}}} \right)/{\text{ absorbance of control}}{-}{\text{blank}})\, \times \,{1}00.$$

The logarithmic regression analysis of dose–response curve was used for calculation of 50% inhibitory concentration of extract (IC50) and 50% cytotoxic concentration of extract (CC50) using GraphPad Prism 5.0.4 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA).

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels

ROS production was detected using the fluorescent 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA) dye according to the kit instructions (ROS assay kit: KROS96, Kiazist Life Sciences, Iran), as described by Mendoca et al. [27]. After treatment with or without extract at 100 µg/mL (< IC50), 222.44 µg/mL (IC50-72 h) and 377.28 µg/mL (IC50-24 h) concentrations for 3, 6, and 12 h, L. major promastigotes were washed with ROS buffer and incubated with DCFDA reagent for 45 min in darkness. The fluorescence intensity was immediately measured as EX / EM = 485/535 nm and analyzed by flow cytometry (PAS Particle Analysing System, Partec, Germany). Glucantime (10 μg/mL) and PBS (Gibco, Paisley, UK) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.

Cultivation of PBMCs and infection with L. major promastigotes

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from healthy heparinized blood as described by Srivastava et al. [28] and cultured in 6-well plates (105 cells/well) containing RPMI 1640 medium (+ HEPES and L-glutamine, Gibco, Paisley, UK, 10% FBS (PAN Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany), 100 U/ml penicillin–100 µg/mL streptomycin (1% P/S, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) as antibiotics) at 37  C – 5% CO2. The adherent cells were infected with L. major promastigotes at stationary growth phase (10:1 parasites/cell) for 4 h and washed three times with PBS (Gibco, Paisley, UK) to remove free parasites. After stabilization of infected cells (amastigote-containing cells) the treatments were performed for 24, 48 and 72 h including negative control, 377.28 μg/mL C. procera leaf extract (24 h-IC50 concentration) and 222.44 μg/mL C. procera leaf extract (72 h-IC50 concentration).

To determine the cytotoxicity effect of C. procera leaf extract on PBMCs, the concentration of extract required to reduce uninfected PBMC growth by 50% after 24–72 h was calculated using the MTT assay.

IFN-γ, TNF-α and iNOS mRNA determination by real-time PCR

Total RNA from infected PBMCs (treated or untreated with extract) was extracted using SinaClon RNXplus kit (SinaClon, Tehran, Iran). Synthesis of cDNA was performed with 1 μg of total RNA using the AccuPower® CycleScript RT PreMix Kit (Bioneer, Daejeon, South Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The specific primers targeting the genes were designed as listed in Table 1, and manufactured (Nedaye Fan Co, Tehran, Iran). The Real-time RT-PCR assays were performed by SYBR Green detection (SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix, Thermo Scientific/Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) and the relative quantification (2−ΔΔCT method) was applied, using the homo-sapiens β-actin gene as the reference control. Real-time RT-PCR reactions were conducted using three-step real-time MicPCR (Bio Molecular system, Upper Coomera, Queensland, Australia) in 20 μL total volume containing 10 μL SYBR Green Master Mix, 2 μL of 1:20 diluted cDNA (50 ng), 0.5 µL of each primer (10 µM), and 7 µL nuclease-free water. The real-time PCR temperature program consisted of a hold at 95˚C for 10 min followed by 40 thermal cycles of 95˚C for 15 s, primer annealing temperature (Table 1) for 20 s, and 72  C for 30 s.

Table 1 The specific primers for β-actin, cytokine (IFN-γ and TNF-α) and iNOS genes
Full size table

Statistical analysis

Values were expressed as the mean of triplicate samples ± standard deviation (SD). The results were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA test followed by Duncan’s multiple range tests (p < 0.05).

Results

In vitro leishmanicidal activity of C. procera against L. major promastigotes

The effect of C. procera leaf extract on L. major promastigotes was monitored after 24 and 72 h of treatment. The extract showed a dose-dependent reduction in promastigote proliferation (Fig. 2), with 50% growth inhibition of the promastigotes at 377.28 μg/mL extract after 24 h and 222.44 μg/mL extract after 72 h of treatment. In order to ensure the selectivity of C. procera leaf extract to act only against intracellular amastigotes, the cytotoxicity against PBMCs was investigated. No cytotoxicity was observed at the concentrations analyzed (selectivity index (SI) higher than 4, Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

MTT assay of L. major promastigotes viability after C. procera leaf extract treatments. Data are expressed as mean of % cell viability ± standard deviation. Significant statistical differences in relation to control are indicated as (*), (**), and (***) at the 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 levels, respectively

Full size image
Table 2 In vitro activity of C. procera against L. major promastigotes and its cytotoxicity for PBMCs
Full size table

C. procera extract increased ROS production

Overproduction of ROS in mitochondria is one of the important defense weapons of the cell against pathological and physiological threats that lead to oxidative stress. We determined the ROS production in L. major promastigotes using fluorescent H2DCFDA detection by flow cytometry. Promastigotes treated with 222.44 and 377.28 µg/mL C. procera extract significantly enhanced ROS production by 1.65 and 4 times (p < 0.001), respectively, compared to controls (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

ROS production in C. procera leaf extract- treated L. major. Promastigotes were treated with 100 ( < IC50), 222.44 (IC50-72 h) and 377.28 (IC50-24 h) µg/mL for 24, 48 and 72 h at 25 ± 1  C. Cells (control and treated cultures) were incubated with probe H2DCFDA (green fluorescent dye). Intracellular ROS production was analyzed by flow cytometry. Data are expressed as mean of DCF fluorescence intensity ± standard deviation. Significant statistical differences in relation to control are indicated as (*), (**), and (***) at the 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 levels, respectively

Full size image

C. procera extract increased expression of IFN-γ and TNF-α transcripts

As shown in Fig. 4, in L. major-infected PBMCs, IFN-γ and TNF-α mRNA expression increased significantly during treatment with C. procera, depending on exposure time (p < 0.01). The highest expression of both IFN-γ and TNF-α genes was detected at 48 h treatment with 377.28 µg/mL C. procera extract, compared to control expression levels (p < 0.001). In the presence of 222.44 µg/mL C. procera extract, cytokine expression in L. major-infected PBMCs significantly increased with increasing exposure time (p < 0.001), such that 72 h treatment induced higher levels of TNF-α and IFN-γ in comparison with control, respectively (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Expression level of IFN-γ (a), TNF-α (b) in L. major-infected PBMCs treated with C. procera. The highest levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α expression were detected at 48-h treatment with 377.28 µg/mL C. procera extract. Significant statistical differences in relation to control are indicated as (*), (**), and (***) at the 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 levels, respectively

Full size image

C. procera increased iNOS mRNA expression

As hypothesized, the level of iNOS mRNA expression was significantly increased (4–16-fold, p < 0.001) by C. procera extract in L. major-infected PBMCs compared to control (Fig. 5). In L. major-infected PBMCs, induction of iNOS expression was significantly increased 4.59-fold after 72-h treatment with 222.44 μg/mL and 3.97- to 16.32-fold following 24- to 48-h treatment with 377.28 µg/mL (p < 0.001, Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression level of iNOS transcripts in L. major-infected PBMCs treated with C. procera leaf extract. The highest level of iNOS expression was detected at 48-h treatment with 377.28 µg/mL C. procera extract. Significant statistical differences in relation to control are indicated as (*), (**), and (***) at the 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 levels, respectively

Full size image

Discussion

The current study represents the first report of C. procera and its impact on the expression of relevant genes in L. major-infected PBMCs. Our findings demonstrated that C. procera could induce ROS generation in L. major promastigotes; increase expression of IFN-γ and TNF-α cytokine genes, together with nitric oxide synthase expression, in L. major-infected PBMCs. Considered together, this indicated an inhibitory effect on the proliferation of L. major promastigotes.

C. procera is known to possess antioxidant, antipyretic, antifungal, antimicrobial, analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive properties which have been attributed to its phytochemical composition [18, 22,23,24]. In the current study, the anti-leishmanial effects of C. procera on L. major promastigotes were evaluated by MTT assay. Our findings showed that C. procera had a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect against L. major promastigotes, as also reported against L. tropica species [26]. The IC50 value obtained from leaf extract of C. procera against L. major promastigotes in the present analysis was 377.28 μg/mL at 24-h treatment and 222.46 μg/m at 72-h treatment which was higher than the value reported (66.8 μg/mL -72 h) in Al Nasr' study [29]. It has been clear that the biosynthesis and accumulation of secondary metabolites in plants are influenced by genetic and environmental factors [30]. Therefore, it is not far from expected that the IC50s of the same plant but grown in different environmental conditions are different. C. procera comprises secondary metabolites such as phenolic compounds, flavonoids, cardiac glycosides, terpenoids, saponins and sterols [17]. The anti-leishmanial effects of these phytochemicals against Leishmania spp. have been demonstrated previously [31]. Therefore, these phytochemicals may have been responsible for the anti-leishmanial activity of C. procera in the current study. Phenolic acids such as gallic acid and ellagic acid [32], and flavonoids, for example, rutin [33] have shown growth-inhibitory effect against promastigotes and amastigotes of L. major and L. donovani, respectively.

Based our results, in a dose–time-dependent manner, L. major promastigote proliferation was inhibited after treatment with C. procera extract as a consequence of increased ROS production. It can be stated that after mitochondrial dysfunction and as a result leakage in the electron transport chain, the level of ROS in Leishmania promastigotes will exceed its basal level [34]. Phytochemicals possessing anti-leishmanial activity may therefore have been able to increase ROS levels, resulting in oxidative stress produced by ROS, thereby causing cell death [31]. Similarly, other studies have pointed out the important role of herbal products in inducing excessive production of ROS and subsequent cell death of Leishmania spp. For example, Dehydroabietic acid isolated from Pinus elliottii in the Gonçalves, et al. study [35] and total phenolic fraction from extra virgin olive oil in the Karampetsou, et al. study [34], promoted cellular ROS production in L. amazonensis and L. major parasites, respectively.

In the current study, 48 h treatment with 377.28 µg/mL C. procera induced IFN-γ and TNF-α expression and increased iNOS gene expression in L. major-infected macrophages, leading to elimination of the parasites. To success of host's defense mechanisms against Leishmania parasite, IFN-γ and TNF-αas pro-inflammatory cytokines play crucial role [36]. Evidently, FN-γ and TNF-α have synergistic effects in killing of Leishmania major by stimulating macrophages to increase ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) production [4, 5, 36]. As a result of increased iNOS gene expression, host cells produce NO via activity of the iNOS enzyme [37]. NO is known to be a major leishmanicidal agent, such that deficiency or inhibition of NO production leads to parasite resistance or survival, respectively [37]. It has been demonstrated that injection of L-NG-monomethyl arginine (L-NMMA), as a NO inhibitor, into the lesions in L. major-infected CBA mice caused disease exacerbation by 10(4)-fold increasing in the number of parasites [38].

According to these findings, increased iNOS expression could represent an effective mechanism for C. procera to control Leishmania infection; supported by the RT-PCR results in the current study. It is evident that antimonials, amphotericin B and other anti-leishmanial agents have been shown to combat parasites by increasing production of ROS and NO [39, 40]. Similarly, the increased release of IFN-γ and TNF-α by C. procera leaf extract could therefore represent an underlying immune mechanism to stimulate iNOS expression and thus NO production. Considering the safety, accessibility and low cost of bioactive compounds, medicinal extracts such as C. procera can be a valuable natural source of anti-leishmanial agents.

Conclusions

In the current study, C. procera leaves extract exerted significant anti-leishmanial activity against L. major promastigotes and amastigotes. This was likely mediated by effective concentrations of C. procera extract increasing the levels of ROS in promastigotes, and increasing the expression levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α and iNOS genes in PBMCs containing amastigotes. Considering that despite the high efficacy rate, the presence of severe side effects, toxicity, some drug resistance and the high cost of chemical anti-leishmanial drugs encourage efforts to find effective, safe and cost-effective natural agents against Leishmania, C. procera can be considered as a new source of natural anti-leishmanial agents. Certainly, to better understand the effect of C. procera leaf extract on leishmaniasis infection, its active and non-toxic components should be studied further utilizing an experimental murine model.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

Abbreviations

CC50 :

50% Cytotoxic concentration

DCFH-DA:

2',7'-Dichlorofluorescein diacetate

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

IC50 :

50% Inhibitory concentration

IFN-γ:

Interferon gamma

iNOS:

Inducible nitric oxide synthase

MTT:

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

NO:

Nitric oxide

PBMCs:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SD:

Standard deviation

SI:

Selectivity index

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-α

References

  1. Foroutan M, Khademvatan S, Majidiani H, Khalkhali H, Hedayati-Rad F, Khashaveh S, Mohammadzadeh H. Prevalence of Leishmania species in rodents: a systematic review and meta-analysis in Iran. Acta Trop. 2017;172:164–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.04.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Badirzadeh A, Taheri T, Taslimi Y, Abdossamadi Z, Heidari-Kharaji M, Gholami E, Sedaghat B, Niyyati M, Rafati S. Arginase activity in pathogenic and non-pathogenic species of Leishmania parasites. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(7): e0005774. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005774.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cortes S, et al. Potential of the natural products against leishmaniasis in Old World-a review of in-vitro studies. Pathog Glob Health. 2020;114(4):170–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2020.1754655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Elmahallawy EK, Alkhaldi AA, Saleh AA. Host immune response against leishmaniasis and parasite persistence strategies: a review and assessment of recent research. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;139: 111671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111671.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rossi M, Fasel N. How to master the host immune system? Leishmania parasites have the solutions! Int Immunol. 2018;30(3):103–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxx075.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mcgwire BS, Satoskar A. Leishmaniasis: clinical syndromes and treatment. QJM. 2014;107(1):7–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hct116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Naderer T, McConville MJ. The Leishmania–macrophage interaction: a metabolic perspective. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(2):301–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01096.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Antonelli LR, Dutra WO, Almeida RP, Bacellar O, Carvalho EM, Gollob KJ. Activated inflammatory T cells correlate with lesion size in human cutaneous leishmaniasis. Immunol Lett. 2005;101(2):226–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2005.06.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaye P, Scott P. Leishmaniasis: complexity at the host–pathogen interface. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(8):604–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bero J, Hannaert V, Chataigné G, Hérent M-F, Quetin-Leclercq J. In vitro antitrypanosomal and antileishmanial activity of plants used in Benin in traditional medicine and bio-guided fractionation of the most active extract. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;137(2):998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2011.07.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Passero LFD, Bonfim-Melo A, Corbett CEP, Laurenti MD, Toyama MH, De Toyama DO, Romoff P, Fávero OA, Dos Grecco SS, Zalewsky CA: Anti-leishmanial effects of purified compounds from aerial parts of Baccharis uncinella C. DC.(Asteraceae). Parasitol Res. 2011, 108(3):529–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-2091-8

  12. Gurib-Fakim A, Mahomoodally MF. African flora as potential sources of medicinal plants: towards the chemotherapy of major parasitic and other infectious diseases: a review. Jordan J Biol Sci. 2013;147(624):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khaliq T, Misra P, Gupta S, Reddy KP, Kant R, Maulik P, Dube A, Narender T. Peganine hydrochloride dihydrate an orally active antileishmanial agent. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett. 2009;19(9):2585–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.03.039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Amini MH, Ashraf K, Salim F, Lim SM, Ramasamy K, Manshoor N, Sultan S, Ahmad W. Important insights from the antimicrobial activity of Calotropis procera. Arab J Chem. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harrison S. Manna and its sources. Kew Bull. 1950;5(3):407–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pandey A, Swarnkar V, Pandey T, Srivastava P, Kanojiya S, Mishra DK, Tripathi V. Transcriptome and metabolite analysis reveal candidate genes of the cardiac glycoside biosynthetic pathway from Calotropis procera. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaker KH, Morsy N, Zinecker H, Imhoff JF, Schneider B. Secondary metabolites from Calotropis procera (Aiton). Phytochem Lett. 2010;3(4):212–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytol.2010.07.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Silva MCC, da Silva AB, Teixeira FM, de Sousa PCP, Rondon RMM, Júnior JERH, Sampaio LRL, Oliveira SL, Holonda ANM, de Vasconcelos SMM: Therapeutic and biological activities of Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br. Asian Pacific J Trop Med. 2010, 3(4):332–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1995-7645(10)60081-8

  19. Kaur A, Batish DR, Kaur S, Chauhan BS. An overview of the characteristics and potential of Calotropis procera from botanical, ecological, and economic perspectives. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:1188. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.690806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Juncker T, Schumacher M, Dicato M, Diederich M. UNBS1450 from Calotropis procera as a regulator of signaling pathways involved in proliferation and cell death. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;78(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2009.01.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohamed NH, Liu M, Abdel-Mageed WM, Alwahibi LH, Dai H, Ismail MA, Badr G, Quinn RJ, Liu X, Zhang L. Cytotoxic cardenolides from the latex of Calotropis procera. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett. 2015;25(20):4615–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.08.044.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moustafa A, Ahmed S, Nabil Z, Hussein A, Omran M. Extraction and phytochemical investigation of Calotropis procera: effect of plant extracts on the activity of diverse muscles. Pharm Biol. 2010;48(10):1080–190. https://doi.org/10.3109/13880200903490513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Obese E, Biney RP, Henneh IT, Anokwah D, Adakudugu EA, Woode E, Ameyaw EO: Antinociceptive effect of the hydroethanolic leaf extract of Calotropis procera (Ait) R. Br.(Apocynaceae): possible involvement of glutamatergic, cytokines, opioidergic and adenosinergic pathways. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2021.114261

  24. Pattnaik PK, Kar D, Chhatoi H, Shahbazi S, Ghosh G, Kuanar A. Chemometric profile & antimicrobial activities of leaf extract of Calotropis procera and Calotropis gigantea. Nat Prod Res. 2017;31(16):1954–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2016.1266349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharma P, Sharma J. In-vitro schizonticidal screening of Calotropis procera. Fitoterapia. 2000;71(1):77–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-326X(99)00121-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ilaghi M, Sharifi I, Sharififar F, Sharifi F, Oliaee RT, Babaei Z, Meimamandi MS, Keyhani A, Bamorovat M. The potential role and apoptotic profile of three medicinal plant extracts on Leishmania tropica by MTT assay, macrophage model and flow cytometry analysis. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2021;12: e00201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parepi.2021.e00201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Mendonça DVC, Lage DP, Calixto SL, Ottoni FM. Antileishmanial activity of a naphthoquinone derivate against promastigote and amastigote stages of Leishmania infantum and Leishmania amazonensis and its mechanism of action against L. amazonensis species. Parasitol Res. 2018;117(2):391–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-017-5713-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Srivastava A, Singh N, Mishra M, Kumar V, Gour JK, Bajpai S, Singh S, Pandey HP, Singh RK. Identification of TLR inducing Th1-responsive Leishmania donovani amastigote-specific antigens. Mol Cell Biochem. 2012;359(1):359–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-011-1029-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Al Nasr I. Evaluation of the in vitro antileishmanial activities of bioactive guided fractionations of two medicinal plants. Trop Biomed. 2020;37(1):15–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Kong D, Fu Y, Sussman MR, Wu H. The effect of developmental and environmental factors on secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;148:80–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Keshav P, Goyal DK, Kaur S. Promastigotes of Leishmania donovani exhibited sensitivity towards the high altitudinal plant Cicer microphyllum. Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2021;1: 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpvbd.2021.100040.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Alves MMdM, Brito LM, Souza AC, Queiroz BCSH, de Carvalho TP, Batista JF, Oliveira JSDSM, de Mendonça IL, Lira SRdS, Chaves MH: Gallic and ellagic acids: two natural immunomodulator compounds solve infection of macrophages by Leishmania major. N-S Arch Pharmacol. 2017, 390:893–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-017-1387-y

  33. Chauhan K, Kaur G, Kaur S. Activity of rutin, a potent flavonoid against SSG-sensitive and-resistant Leishmania donovani parasites in experimental leishmaniasis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2018;64:372–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2018.09.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Karampetsou K, Koutsoni OS, Gogou G, Angelis A, Skaltsounis L-A, Dotsika E. Total Phenolic Fraction (TPF) from Extra Virgin Olive Oil: Induction of apoptotic-like cell death in Leishmania spp. promastigotes and in vivo potential of therapeutic immunomodulation. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(1):e0008968. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008968.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gonçalves MD, Bortoleti B, Tomiotto-Pellissier F, Miranda-Sapla MM, Assolini JP, Carloto ACM, Carvalho P, Tudisco ET, Urbano A, Ambrósio SR. Dehydroabietic acid isolated from Pinus elliottii exerts in vitro antileishmanial action by pro-oxidant effect, inducing ROS production in promastigote and downregulating Nrf2/ferritin expression in amastigote forms of Leishmania amazonensis. Fitoterapia. 2018;128:224–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2018.05.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Maspi N, Abdoli A, Ghaffarifar F. Pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines in cutaneous leishmaniasis: a review. Pathog Glob Health. 2016;110(6):247–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2016.1232042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pandey RK, Mehrotra S, Sharma S, Gudde RS, Sundar S, Shaha C. Leishmania donovani-induced increase in macrophage Bcl-2 favors parasite survival. Front Immunol. 2016;7:456. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Liew F, Millott S, Parkinson C, Palmer R, Moncada S. Macrophage killing of Leishmania parasite in vivo is mediated by nitric oxide from L-arginine. J Immunol. 1990;144(12):4794–7. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.144.12.4794.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Haldar AK, Banerjee S, Naskar K, Kalita D, Islam NS, Roy S. Sub-optimal dose of sodium antimony gluconate (SAG)-diperoxovanadate combination clears organ parasites from BALB/c mice infected with antimony resistant Leishmania donovani by expanding antileishmanial T-cell repertoire and increasing IFN-γ to IL-10 ratio. Exp Parasitol. 2009;122(2):145–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2009.02.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Saha P, Mukhopadhyay D, Chatterjee M. Immunomodulation by chemotherapeutic agents against Leishmaniasis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11(11):1668–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2011.08.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff of the Department of Parasitology and Mycology & Cellular and Molecular Research Center of Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.

Funding

This study was supported by the Research Project of the Cellular and Molecular Research Center of Urmia University of Medical Science (Grant No: 3007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Cellular and Molecular Medicine Institute & Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

    Shahla Amani, Soheila Alinejad, Negar Asadi, Elham Yousefi & Shahram Khademvatan

  2. School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia

    Gordon Stanley Howarth

Authors
  1. Shahla Amani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Soheila Alinejad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Negar Asadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elham Yousefi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shahram Khademvatan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gordon Stanley Howarth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SA developed proposal, designed the study, implemented the study, collected the data, data management and analysis, manuscript writing and editing. SA collected the data, implemented the study. NA and EY supported for data collection, co-ordination. SK developed proposal, designed the study, supported for data collection, co-ordination, data management, manuscript editing, supervision. GSH provided technical inputs, manuscript writing and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahram Khademvatan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran, at [http://ris.umsu.ac.ir/& ethics.research.ac.ir], reference number: Code: IR.UMSU.REC.1397.433, Ethics approval date: 2019-06-19.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amani, S., Alinejad, S., Asadi, N. et al. Anti-Leishmania major activity of Calotropis procera extract by increasing ROS production and upregulating TNF-α, IFN-γ and iNOS mRNA expression under in vitro conditions. Trop Med Health 52, 16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-024-00578-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-024-00578-4

Keywords

Tropical Medicine and Health

ISSN: 1349-4147

Contact us