Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Impact of access to improved water and sanitation on diarrhea reduction among rural under-five children in low and middle-income countries: a propensity score matched analysis

Tropical Medicine and Health volume 51, Article number: 36 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Diarrhea, the second leading cause of child morbidity and mortality worldwide, is responsible for more than 90% of deaths in children under 5 years of age in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). The high burden of diarrhea is mainly attributable to the limited access to improved water and sanitation. However, the impacts of improved sanitation and drinking water in preventing diarrheal diseases are not well understood. Therefore, this study estimated both the independent and joint effects of improved sanitation and water on diarrhea occurrence among rural under-five children in LMICs.

Methods

The current study utilized secondary data from the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) datasets conducted between 2016 and 2021 in 27 LMICs. A total weighted sample of 330,866 under-five children was included in the study. We employed propensity score matching analysis (PSMA) to examine the effects of accessing improved water and sanitation on childhood diarrheal disease reduction.

Results

The prevalence of diarrhea among children under 5 years of age in rural LMICs was 11.02% (95% CI; 10.91%, 11.31%). The probability of developing diarrhea among under-five children from households with improved sanitation and water was 16.6% (Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) = − 0.166) and 7.4% (ATT = − 0.074) times less likely among those from households with unimproved sanitation and water, respectively. Access to improved water and sanitation is significantly associated with a 24.5% (ATT = − 0.245) reduction of diarrheal disease among under-five children.

Conclusions

Improved sanitation and drinking water source reduced the risk of diarrhea among under-five children in LMIC. The effects of both interventions (improved water and sanitation) had a larger impact on the reduction of diarrheal disease than the improvements to water or sanitation alone. Therefore, achieving Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6) is key to reducing diarrhea among rural under-five children.

Background

Diarrhea is the passage of three or more loose or liquid stools per 24 h (or more frequent passage that is different from normal) [1]. Globally, 1.7 billion cases of diarrhea occur each year, killing more than 525,000 children under the age of five annually. This accounts for 8% of all causes of death in under-five children [2, 3]. Diarrhea is the second leading cause of child morbidity and mortality worldwide and is responsible for more than 90% of deaths in children under 5 years of age in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) [2].

An inequitable proportion of diarrheal morbidity and mortality occurs among under-five children in LMICs where access to health care, improved water and sanitation is limited [4, 5]. Unimproved water and sanitation are the leading cause of diarrhea, responsible for 72·1% and 56·4% of diarrhea mortality in children younger than 5 years, respectively [6].

Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG-6) aims to achieve universal and equitable access to drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene for all by 2030 [7]. However, in 2020, more than a quarter (26%) and nearly half (46%) of the world’s population lacked access to improved drinking water and sanitation, respectively. By 2030, billions of people will be without access to improved water and sanitation unless progress quadruples [8]. In addition, there are significant disparities in access to improved water and sanitation across regions and between urban and rural areas. Access to improved sanitation and drinking water is lower in rural areas than in urban areas. In particular, people without access to improved water and sanitation facilities are disproportionately concentrated in rural parts of Southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa regions [9,10,11,12]. Also it has been noted that, in rural settings, only 2 out of 10 people have access to basic drinking water services [13].

The various socio-demographic, socio-economic, behavioral, and environmental factors are known to contribute to the occurrence of diarrhea among under-five children in the LMICs [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. The association between drinking water source and sanitation and childhood diarrhea has been documented in the literatures [14, 18, 22, 24,25,26,27,28,29]. The provision of an improved drinking water source and sanitation reduced diarrhea risk by 52% and 24%, respectively, in LMICs [22]. However, most of the previous studies investigated the association between water source and sanitation and diarrhea used the conventional logistic regression model [14, 18, 22, 24,25,26,27,28]. Unlike the conventional logistic regression model, the use of propensity score matched analysis offers a better option compared to conventional logistic regression analyses in controlling for the confounding that may exist in analyzing associations between independent variables and the outcome variable.

Furthermore, the previous studies conducted in different countries showed that access to improved water and sanitation facilities is low in rural areas [30,31,32,33], however, there is a scarcity of information on effects of improved water and sanitation on reduction of diarrhea in rural settings. Therefore, understanding the causal effect of improved water and sanitation on the reduction of diarrhea in high-risk population will help public health practitioners to identify, implement and evaluate evidence-based specific interventions to tackle the burden of diarrheal diseases among under-five children in LMICs. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate effectiveness of access to improved sanitation and water on under-five diarrheal reduction using propensity score matching.

Methods

Study design and settings

The study was based on the national community-based cross-sectional survey data conducted between 2016 and 2021 in 27 LMICs. Low and middle-income countries are home to 62% of the global under-five population [34]. Generally, rural areas have poor health outcomes than urban areas in LMICs [35].

Data source and study population

We used appended Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) datasets of 27 LMICs conducted during the SDG era. The DHS is a nationally representative survey, collected every five years in LMICs to provide up-to-date information on the background characteristics of all household members, neighborhood infrastructure, housing conditions, and access to basic services for policy development, planning, and evaluation of population and health programs in the respective countries. Data were collected by trained professionals and the questionnaire was conceptualized to each country’s context. Moreover, each country pre-tested questionnaire before actual data collection. Each country survey consists of different types of datasets such as household member recode (PR), individual (women’s) recode (IR), children’s recode (KR), births recode (BR), men’s recode (MR) and household recode (HR) datasets. For this study, we merged the household member recode (PR) and the Kids Record datasets (KR file). The dependent, treatment, and matching variables for each country were extracted from both datasets. In this analysis, a total weighted sample of 278,111 rural children aged 6–59 months was included.

Study variables and measurement

Dependent variable

The outcome variable for this study was childhood diarrhea. Diarrhea was assessed by asking the mothers/caregivers “has your child had diarrhea in the last 2 weeks?” It was recoded as “one” if mothers/caregivers responded yes to the question and “zero” if mothers/caregivers answered no to the question.

Treatment variables

The treatment variables were household access to improved water and sanitation. Household access to water sources and sanitation facilities were categorized based on the World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) definitions as “improved” and “unimproved”. Accordingly, the source of water was categorized as “improved” if the source of water is from protected well, protected spring, rainwater, piped into dwelling, piped to yard/plot, public tap/standpipe, tube well or borehole, piped to neighbor or bottled water and “unimproved” if the sources of water is unprotected dug well, unprotected spring, surface water, vendor-provided water, bottled water, or tanker truck water. Households using ventilated improved pit latrine, pour-flush latrine, simple pit latrine, pit latrine with slab, composting toilet, or if toilet flushed to a public sewer or septic system were coded as “improved toilet” and households using toilet characterized by pit latrine—without slab, flushing to somewhere else, bucket toilet, traditional dry vault, dry toilet, or other toilet were coded as “unimproved toilet”.

Matching variables

On the basis of available literature, a number of household, maternal/caregiver, and child related variables were included as covariates. The lists of included variables were: maternal age, maternal educational level, household wealth status, frequency of listening to the radio, frequency of watching television, frequency of reading newspaper/magazines, hand washing, treating water, parity, family size, age of the child, birth order, stunting, child underweight, wasting, number of under-five children in the household and breastfeeding.

Treating water: Households reported the use of one or more of the following methods to treat drinking water prior to drinking and categorized as “yes” if they did so and “no” otherwise; boiling, adding bleach/chlorine, straining through a cloth, using a water filter, solar disinfection, letting it stand and settle were considered as yes/using appropriate water treatment.

Wasting

Child was categorized as wasted if weight for height (WAZ) is < − 2 standard deviation (SD) and normal WAZ/not wasted if WAZ ≥ − 2SD from the median of the WHO reference population.

Underweight

A child was considered to be underweight if their underweight for age is < − 2 SD from the median of the WHO reference population.

Stunting

Child was categorized as stunted if height for age (HAZ) is < − 2 SD and normal HAZ/not stunted if HAZ -2SD and above from the median of the WHO reference population.

Data analysis

Descriptive analysis was first undertaken to estimate the prevalence of diarrhea among under-five children according to household access to water and sanitation. This study used PSM to draw causal inferences of household access to water and sanitation to childhood diarrhea. The analysis has been carried out in three separate models. In the first model, we compared “improved sanitation” with “unimproved sanitation”. In the second model we compared “access to improved water” with “unimproved water”. Finally, we compared “access to both improved water and sanitation” with “unimproved water and sanitation”. We generated the propensity score by using pscore Stata command.

The common support option was employed to limit testing of the balancing property to only treated mothers whose propensity score for diarrhea was included within the range of propensity scores. The average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) was estimated to assess the impact of treatment variables on outcome variable. A one-to-one nearest neighbor matching technique within a caliper range of ± 0.1 was performed. Balancing tests were evaluated graphically by density plot and statistically by using pstest Stata command.

Results

Background characteristics of respondents

The study included 278,111 children under the age of five. Of these, 113,582 (40.8%) were in the 0–11 months age group and 94,577 (36.5%) were stunted. More than half (54.7%) of the children were born to women of age 25–34 years, and 84,790 (30.5%) had no formal education. Nearly two-thirds (n = 183,236, 65.9%) of the households had access to an improved water source, and 158,695 (57.1) had improved toilet facilities. Nearly two-thirds (n = 182,430, 65.6%) of households treated water before drinking (Table 1).

Table 1 Background characteristics of respondents in LMICs
Full size table

Prevalence of diarrhea among under-five children

The prevalence of diarrhea among children under 5 years of age in rural LMICs was 11.0% (95% CI; 10.9%, 11.3%). The pooled prevalence of diarrhea among children under 5 years of age in rural areas without improved toilet facilities was 12.5% (95% CI; 12.3%, 12.6%), while the prevalence of diarrhea among children under 5 years of age who used improved toilet facilities was 9.7% (95% CI; 9.1%, 11.2%). The country with the highest prevalence of diarrhea among under-five children was Burundi (22.7%), followed by Uganda (20.7%) and Haiti (20.6%). Whereas the lowest prevalence of diarrhea was observed in Maldives (4.4%) followed by Bangladesh (4.8%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Prevalence of diarrhea among under-five children in LMICs
Full size table

Description of the estimated propensity scores

A comparison of improved vs unimproved sanitation showed that the mean propensity score was 0.595 with a standard deviation (SD) of ± 0.225. The region of common support between the treated and the control group ranged from 0.104 to 0.991 on the propensity score. The overall mean propensity score was 0.372 (SD ± 0.09) for improved and unimproved water. The region of common support between the improved (treated) and the control (unimproved) water ranged from 0.152 to 0.738. For both improved water and sanitation, the overall mean propensity score was 0.201 (SD ± 0.08). The region of common support between treated and control ranged from 0.06 to 0.647.

Figure 1A–C shows the balance of the propensity score distributions between the treatment and control groups. The figures demonstrate adequate overlap in the propensity score distributions between treated and control groups. Figure 1A indicates that when comparing improved with unimproved sanitation, a total of 66 treated observations out of 256,020 observations were discarded due to common support. Figure 1B shows that when comparing improved with unimproved water, a total of 42 treated observations out of 256,020 observations were discarded due to common support.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Histogram of propensity score distribution for treated and control children: A for type of toilet facility, B for source of drinking water and C for improved water and sanitation

Full size image

Impact assessment

The matched analysis showed that the probability of developing diarrhea was 7.4% (ATT = − 0.074) lower among children from households with improved sanitation compared with children from households with unimproved sanitation. Children in households with improved drinking water were 16.6% less likely to develop diarrhea than children in households with unimproved drinking water (ATT = − 0.166). Meanwhile, having both improved water and sanitation are significantly associated 24.5% (ATT = − 0.245) reduction of diarrheal disease among under-five children (Table 3).

Table 3 Unmatched and matched estimates of treatment variables on occurrence of diarrhea among under-five children in LMICs
Full size table

Balancing test

Figure 2A–C shows the distributions of the propensity scores before and after matching for treatment variables. Results indicate that the distributions of the propensity scores perfectly overlapped after matching for all treatment variables. This indicates covariates were sufficiently balanced after matching. Similarly, for almost all variables, the hypothesis of each variable is the same in the treated children and untreated children after matching was satisfied (p-value ≥ 0.05) (Additional file 1: Table S1)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kernel density plot of estimated propensity scores before and after matching: A for type of toilet facility, B for source of drinking water and C for improved water and sanitation

Full size image

Discussion

This study is a large-scale study specifically intended to estimate the effect of access to improved sanitation and water on diarrhea reduction among under-five children in 27 LMICs. Although considerable progress has been made in reducing under-five mortality from 9.92 million (75 per 1000 live births) to 5 million (37 per 1000 live births) between 2000 and 2020, it remains a major public health issue signaling much remains to do. With the current progress, it is far more difficult to achieve the SDGs under-five mortality target of 25 deaths per 1000 live births by 2030 in most LMICs [36, 37]. Diarrhea is one of the major contributors to under-five children mortality in LMICs. More than three-fourths (78%) of childhood diarrheal deaths occurred in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa [6]. This study used PSM to estimate effectiveness of access to improved sanitation and water on diarrhea reduction among under-five children in LMICs during the SDG era. The propensity score matching is a statistical method that attempts to estimate treatment effects with observational data. It offers an alternative approach for estimating treatment effects, policy, and program evaluation in cases where randomized controlled trials (RCT) are impossible or inappropriate [38, 39]. Using observational data, the PSM analysis in the present study showed that access to improved sanitation and drinking water significantly reduced the risk of diarrhea among under-five children.

This study revealed that improved sanitation was associated with a 16% reduction in the risk of diarrhea occurrence among under-five children after matching control and treated children. This finding is in agreement with other studies conducted elsewhere [17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 27, 28, 40]. A systematic and meta-analysis conducted by Wolf J et al. found that improved sanitation interventions can reduce the occurrence of diarrheal diseases by 24% among children in LMICs [22]. A study conducted in rural Ethiopia reported that children from households who had no access to toilet facilities were 1.50 to 4.8 times more likely to having of diarrhea compared to children from households who had access to toilet facilities [18, 24, 27, 40]. Also, a study conducted in rural Tanzania revealed that improved waste management reduced diarrhea risk by 63% among children [28]. However, previous studies were largely observational and used conventional regression models to investigate the association between access to improved sanitation and diarrhea. To our knowledge, this is the first study in LMICs to use PSM to estimate the effectiveness of access to improved sanitation and water on diarrhea reduction. Improving access to Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) is a key intervention to improve child health and well-being by preventing the spread of communicable diseases. Poor WASH is the main cause of feco-oral transmitted infections, including diarrheal disease, which remains the major global public health problem. Besides, diarrheal diseases, poor WASH also contributes to increased risk of malaria, polio, and neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) such as trachoma, guinea worm, schistosomiasis, and helminths that have a debilitating effect on children’s health [41,42,43]. Improving WASH supports the achievement of many SDGs. It contributes to the achievement of improving child health (SDG 3), reducing malnutrition (SDG 2), ending child poverty (SDG 1), creating decent working conditions (SDG 8), and environmental protection and climate change (SDG 13) [41]. Despite, ensuring universal and equitable access to improved drinking water, sanitation and hygiene for all is one of the SDGs of the United Nations, its coverage remains low in LMICs [9,10,11,12].

Similarly, we observed a negative association between access to improved water and diarrhea occurrence among under-five children. This finding is consistent with a study conducted in LMICs which reported that the provision of improved drinking water reduced diarrhea risk by 52% [22]. Similarly, Ko SH et al. found that under-five children in households with drinking untreated are less likely to develop diarrhea in the rural areas of Myanmar [44]. This might be due to the fact that unimproved source of drinking water may carry pathogens that cause diarrhea.

Our finding also noted that access to both improved sanitation and water had a greater impact on the reduction of diarrhea. As such, we found that nearly a quarter (24.5%) of diarrhea cases among under-five children could be reduced by accessing improved sanitation and water in LMICs. So far, very limited studies have investigated the joint effects of improved water and sanitation services in preventing diarrheal disease. Consistent with our finding, Fuller et al. reported that both interventions had a larger impact on the reduction of diarrheal disease than the improvements to water or sanitation alone [45]. In fact, improved water sources had no meaningful effect on health if a community had unimproved sanitation since files can contaminate water sources. In contrast, a systematic and meta-analysis conducted in less developed countries revealed that multiple interventions (consisting of combined water, sanitation, and hygiene measures) were not more effective than interventions with a single focus (water, sanitation, or hygiene) [46]. A possible explanation for this difference could be in that our analysis included an up-to-date national representative data from the DHS. Second, we estimated using observational data by PSM approach instead of meta-analyses of intervention trials and observational studies as previous studies had done.

The current study has several strengths: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has investigated both the independent and joint effects of improved water and sanitation on the occurrence of diarrhea among under-five children in LMICs. Using the large nationally representative sample, and PSM that reduces selection bias and confounding effect are also strengths of this study. Notwithstanding these strengths, our study has some limitations. First, PSM matches the treated with controls which leads to better estimates of treatment effect, however, estimates rely on the un confoundedness assumption. Therefore, bias due to unmeasured covariates is not accounted for leading to overestimated effects of improved water and sanitation on diarrhea. Second, even though the effect of improved water and sanitation may vary from setting to setting, country-specific estimates are not reported in this study.

Conclusion

Improved sanitation and drinking water source reduced the risk of diarrhea significantly among under-five children in LMIC. The effects of both interventions (improved water and sanitation) had a larger impact on the reduction of diarrheal disease than the improvements to water or sanitation alone. Achieving SDG 6 is key in reducing diarrhea among rural under-five children. Therefore, policymakers should strengthen capacity and systems to enable all stakeholders to contribute effectively in order to scale-up access to improved water and sanitation in rural populations.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available online in a public, open-access repository (www.measuredhs.com/data).

Abbreviations

ATT:

Average treatment effect on the treated

DHS:

Demographic and health survey

LMICs:

Low and middle-income countries

PSM:

Propensity score matching

WHO:

World Health Organization

SDG:

Sustainable Development Goal

References

  1. Gidudu J, Sack DA, Pina M, Hudson M, Kohl K, Bishop P, et al. Diarrhea: case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2011;29(5):1053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. UNICEF. One is too many; ending child death from pnemonia and diarrhea New York, NY 10017. USA: Lancet; 2016.

  3. World Health Organization. diarrheal disease fact sheets 2017 [updated 2017; Accessed 2021 8 JuN].

  4. GBD. Diarrhoeal Diseases Collaborators Estimates of global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoeal diseases: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;2017(17):909–48.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mills A. Health care systems in low- and middle-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:552–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Troeger C, Blacker BF, Khalil IA, Rao PC, Cao S, Zimsen SR, et al. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoea in 195 countries: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(11):1211–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. United Nations 2015 Transforming Our World: 2030 agenda tentative translation for sustainable development. United Nations, New York, USA.

  8. WHO. Sustainable Development Goals: ensuring accessing water and sanitation for all [Internet]. 2021. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/water-and-sanitation/.

  9. Deshpande A, Miller-Petrie MK, Lindstedt PA, et al. Mapping geographical inequalities in access to drinking water and sanitation facilities in low-income and middle-income countries 2000–17. Lancet Glob Heal. 2020;8(9):e1101.

    Google Scholar 

  10. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization (WHO). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2017 Special focus on inequalities. Launch version July 12 Main report Progress on Drinking Water , Sanitation and Hygiene. 2019. 140 p.

  11. Srivastava S, Banerjee S, Debbarma S, Kumar P, Sinha D. Rural-urban differentials in the prevalence of diarrhoea among older adults in India: evidence from Longitudinal Ageing Study in India, 2017–18. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265040.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bain R, Cronk R, Hossain R, Bonjour S, Onda K, Wright J, et al. Global assessment of exposure to faecal contamination through drinking water based on a systematic review. Trop Med Int Heal. 2014;19(8):917–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization and UNICEF. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2020: five years into the SDGs, Geneva, 2021.

  14. Fenta SM, Nigussie TZ. Factors associated with childhood diarrheal in Ethiopia; a multilevel analysis. Arch Public Heal. 2021;79(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Demissie GD, Yeshaw Y, Aleminew W, Akalu Y. Diarrhea and associated factors among under five children in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from demographic and health surveys of 34 sub-Saharan countries. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tareke AA, Enyew EB, Takele BA. Pooled prevalence and associated factors of diarrhea among under-five years children in East Africa: a multilevel logistic regression analysis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264559.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Connell BJO, Quinn MA, Scheuerman P. Risk factors of diarrheal disease among children in the East African countries of Burundi, Rwanda and Tanzania. GjmedphCom. 2017;6(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ferede MM. Socio-demographic, environmental and behavioural risk factors of diarrhoea among under-five children in rural Ethiopia: further analysis of the 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Atnafu A, Sisay MM, Demissie GD, Tessema ZT. Geographical disparities and determinants of childhood diarrheal illness in Ethiopia: further analysis of 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. Trop Med Health. 2020;48(1):64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Claudine U, Kim JY, Kim EM, Yong TS. Association between sociodemographic factors and diarrhea in children under 5 years in Rwanda. Korean J Parasitol. 2021;59(1):61–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Soboksa NE. Associations between improved water supply and sanitation usage and childhood Diarrhea in Ethiopia: an analysis of the 016 demographic and health survey. Environ Health Insights. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/11786302211002552.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolf J, Hubbard S, Brauer M, Ambelu A, Arnold BF, Bain R, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to improve drinking water, sanitation, and handwashing with soap on risk of diarrhoeal disease in children in low-income and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2022;400(10345):48–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cha S, Lee JE, Seo DS, Park BM, Mansiangi P, Bernard K, et al. Effects of improved sanitation on diarrheal reduction for children under five in Idiofa, DR Congo: a cluster randomized trial. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;6(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Workie GY, Akalu TY, Baraki AG. Environmental factors affecting childhood diarrheal disease among under-five children in Jamma district, South Wello zone, Northeast Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):804.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gebrezgiabher BB, Abraha TH, Tetemke D, Gidey G, Asres N, Tesfamariam A, et al. Diarrheal disease in under-five children among model and non-model families in northern Ethiopia, 2017: a comparative cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4322-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tafere Y, Abebe Abate B, Demelash Enyew H, Belete MA. Diarrheal diseases in under-five children and associated factors among farta district rural community, Amhara Regional State, North Central Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study. J Environ Public Health. 2020;2020:3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Getachew A, Tadie A, Ghiwot M, Guadu T, Haile D, Cherkos GT, et al. Environmental factors of diarrhea prevalence among under five children in rural area of North Gondar zone Ethiopia. Ital J Pediatr. 2018;44(1):5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McClelland PH, Kenney CT, Palacardo F, Roberts NLS, Luhende N, Chua J, et al. Improved water and waste management practices reduce Diarrhea risk in children under age five in rural Tanzania: a community-based, cross-sectional analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roushdy R, Sieverding M, Radwan H. The impact of water supply and sanitation interventions on child health: evidence from Egypt. Poverty Gender Youth Work Pap. 2012;24:70.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Irianti S, Prasetyoputra P. Rural–urban disparities in access to improved sanitation in indonesia: a decomposition approach. SAGE Open. 2021;11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211029920.

  31. Andualem Z, Dagne H, Azene ZN, Taddese AA, Dagnew B, Fisseha R, et al. Households access to improved drinking water sources and toilet facilities in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis based on 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e042071.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Simelane MS, Shongwe MC, Vermaak K, Zwane E. Determinants of households’ access to improved drinking water sources: a secondary analysis of Eswatini 2010 and 2014 multiple indicator cluster surveys. Adv Public Health. 2020;2020:6758513. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6758513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Belay DG, Andualem Z. Limited access to improved drinking water, unimproved drinking water, and toilet facilities among households in Ethiopia: Spatial and mixed effect analysis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. UNICEF. The state of the World’s children. a fair chance for every child. New York: UNICEF; 2016. p. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fagbamigbe AF, Oyinlola FF, Morakinyo OM, Adebowale AS, Fagbamigbe OS, Uthman AO. Mind the gap: what explains the rural-nonrural inequality in diarrhoea among under-five children in low and medium-income countries? A decomposition analysis. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. WHO. Child mortality (under 5 years) [Internet]. 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/levels-and-trends-in-child-under-5-mortality-in-2020. Accessed 28 Jan 2022.

  37. Sharrow D, Hug L, You D, Alkema L, Black R, Cousens S, et al. Global, regional, and national trends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2019 with scenario-based projections until 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Lancet Glob Heal. 2022;10(2):e195-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00515-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Matched Sampl Causal Eff. 2006;1083:170–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hailu B, Ji-Guo W, Hailu T. Water, sanitation, and hygiene risk factors on the prevalence of diarrhea among under-five children in the rural community of Dangila District. Northwest Ethiopia J Trop Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2688500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. UNICEF. Strategy for Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 2016–2030. UNICEF Website [Internet]. 2016;20(2):1–60. https://www.unicef.org/wash/files/UNICEF_Strategy_for_WASH_2016_2030.PDF

  42. Prüss-Ustün, et al. Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene in low- and middle-income settings. Trop Med Int Heal. 2014;19(8):894–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kassebaum NJ, Arora M, Barber RM, Brown J, Carter A, Casey DC, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1603–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ko SH, Sakai H. Water sanitation, hygiene and the prevalence of diarrhea in the rural areas of the delta region of Myanmar. J Water Health. 2022;20(1):149–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fuller JA, Westphal JA, Kenney B, Eisenberg JNS. The joint effects of water and sanitation on diarrheal disease: a multi-country analysis of the Demographic and Health Surveys. Trop Med Int Heal. 2016;20(3):284–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fewtrell L, Kaufmann RB, Kay D, Enanoria W, Haller L, Colford JM Jr. Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(1):42–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Measure DHS for providing us with the data set.

Funding

No funder.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Mehari Woldemariam Merid, Adugnaw Zeleke Alem, Daniel Gashaneh Belay & Fantu Mamo Aragaw

  2. Department of Human Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Dagmawi Chilot

  3. Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Dagmawi Chilot

  4. Department of Human Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Daniel Gashaneh Belay & Anteneh Ayelign Kibret

  5. Department of Women’s and Family Health, School of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Melaku Hunie Asratie

  6. Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Yadelew Yimer Shibabaw

Authors
  1. Mehari Woldemariam Merid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adugnaw Zeleke Alem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dagmawi Chilot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel Gashaneh Belay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anteneh Ayelign Kibret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Melaku Hunie Asratie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yadelew Yimer Shibabaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fantu Mamo Aragaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AZA and MWM: conceptualization, study design, execution, acquisition of the data, analysis and interpretation, writing, and review and editing. DC, DGB, MHA, AAK, YYS, and FMA: study design, execution, acquisition of the data, analysis and interpretation, writing, and review and editing. All the authors read, draft and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adugnaw Zeleke Alem.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Permission to access the data was obtained from the measure DHS program (http://www.dhsprogram.com) via online request. The website and the data used were publicly available with no personal identifier. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Covariate balance check and absolute bias reduction

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Merid, M.W., Alem, A.Z., Chilot, D. et al. Impact of access to improved water and sanitation on diarrhea reduction among rural under-five children in low and middle-income countries: a propensity score matched analysis. Trop Med Health 51, 36 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-023-00525-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-023-00525-9

Keywords

Tropical Medicine and Health

ISSN: 1349-4147

Contact us