Skip to main content

Molecular epidemiology of malaria parasite amongst patients in a displaced people’s camp in Sudan



Despite the importance of epidemiological studies in the development of effective control strategies and provision of basic health services for refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs), data on the prevalence of malaria are limited. Thus, this study was conducted to estimate the molecular prevalence of malaria amongst the displaced population in Ardamata IDP camp in Al-Geneina City, Sudan.


A cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2018 to December 2018 to estimate malaria prevalence amongst the displaced population in Ardamata IDP camp in Al-Geneina City, Sudan. A total of 380 patients with suspected malaria were recruited. Nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR) assays were performed to detect the Plasmodium genus and species.


Of 380 patients, 232 (61.1%) were positive for malaria. Plasmodium falciparum was the only prevalent species detected amongst the study population. nPCR analysis revealed that none of the samples had Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium ovale or Plasmodium malariae. The malaria prevalence rate was higher amongst males (67.1%) than in females (56.8%), and gender was the only risk factor that was significantly associated with malaria infection (p = .042).


Despite control programmes, malaria remains a significant cause of illness amongst a displaced population. The high prevalence of malaria infection in this study indicates that additional health facilities and control strategies should be implemented in displaced camps and the surrounding areas.


Malaria is a fatal vector-borne tropical disease that remains one of the leading causes of death in many developing countries [1]. The disease continues to pose global public health challenges, and its related morbidity and mortality remain significantly high in endemic countries such as Sudan. Although intensive control measures in recent years have resulted in a substantial reduction in the disease burden, the limited control options and availability of resources due to the violent conflict in Darfur maintain the high risk of malaria in displaced camps; vulnerability to malaria might be promoted by many factors including decimated health care infrastructure and social disruption, making the disease responsible for most cases of death [2]. The high prevalence of malaria in displaced populations in Africa constitutes an emerging challenge for humanitarian response as the disease becomes a serious health problem amongst internally displaced persons (IDPs) in these areas. In Sudan, malaria is one of the most concerning infectious diseases amongst displaced populations, and data on malaria prevalence in displaced camps are extremely limited. Additional epidemiological information is required for the development of effective control strategies and provision of basic health services, because the overall aim of any epidemiological study is to prevent and reduce excess mortality and morbidity. According to the World Health Organisation, five Plasmodium species have been recognised as the causative agents of malaria that can infect humans: Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum), Plasmodium vivax (P. vivax), Plasmodium ovale (P. ovale), Plasmodium malariae (P. malariae) and Plasmodium knowlesi (P. knowlesi). Of these five species, P. falciparum and P. vivax are the most common in Sudan.

Blood film microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests are the mainstay of malaria diagnosis that can adequately detect Plasmodium infections in patients with high levels of parasitaemia [3, 4]. However, both methods lack the sensitivity to detect the infection in individuals carrying low parasite density [5, 6]. Given that low-grade parasitaemia in asymptomatic individuals can persist for a year or more, important sources of further transmission must be considered. Recent reports showed that sub-microscopic infections represent about 70–80% of all Plasmodium infections amongst children, pregnant women and non-pregnant adults [7]. Thus, highly sensitive diagnostic methods are necessary. In recent years, several molecular methods have been developed and evaluated for the detection of Plasmodium species, and various sensitivities and specificities have been reported [1]. Amongst them, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most frequently used method in the field [8]. PCR has also been helpful in the differential detection of all malaria parasites up to species levels, thereby revealing the high prevalence of mixed infections [1, 9]. The application of sensitive methods such as PCR to determine the prevalence of Plasmodium species will allow better documentation of malaria epidemiology [10] and overcome the lack of knowledge on the prevalence of malaria infection in the displaced population. This study was proposed to determine the molecular prevalence of malaria parasites amongst symptomatic patients in Ardamata IDP camp, Al-Geneina City, Sudan.


Study setting

This study was carried out in Ardamata IDP camp established in Al-Geneina City, which is the capital city of West Darfur State, the western part of Sudan. It is located in the latitude of 13° 27′ 15′′ and longitude of 22° 26′ 8′′. Al-Geneina is approximately 1200 km from the capital city of Khartoum.

Study design and population

This study was a cross-sectional study that recruited patients presenting clinical symptoms of malaria and visiting the health centre in the study site. A total of 380 patients were recruited for this study between July and December 2018.

Samples size calculation

The sample size was estimated using formula for single proportion to estimate the prevalence of malaria.

$$ \left(\frac{z}{m}\right)2\ \mathrm{x}\ \mathrm{p}\ \left(1-\mathrm{p}\right) $$

The parameters used were z = 1.96 (for 0.05 level of significance), margin of error (m) = 0.05, p = 0.575 and 0.33 for P. falciparum and P. vivax respectively [11]. The calculated sample size was 376 and 340 for P. falciparum and P. vivax respectively. Hence, the largest sample size based on P. falciparum (376) was used. After adding 5% dropout rate, the adjusted samples size was estimated as 396.

Sample collection

About 3–5 drops of blood from each enrolled participant were collected on Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The blood samples were allowed to dry, kept in individual plastic bags with desiccant and stored at room temperature. An informed consent questionnaire was used to collect individual socio-demographic data.

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from three 3 mm punches of dried blood spot (DBS) following the protocol of Bereczky et al. [12]. DNA was eluted in a total volume of 50 μl of tri-EDTA buffer (TE) buffer and stored at − 20 °C.

PCR for Plasmodium detection

Nested PCR (nPCR) was performed as described previously [13] in a two-step procedure. In the first PCR round, amplification was performed using rPLU1 and rPLU5 primers for Plasmodium genus determination. The PCR mixture was prepared in a total volume of 20 μl, containing 10 μl of MyTaq™ mix (Bioline, UK), 0.4 μM of each primer and 2.5 μl of extracted DNA. PCR was performed under the following conditions: 94 °C for 5 min as the initial denaturation step; 25 cycles at 94 °C for 45 s, 58 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 1 min; and a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplified PCR product (1 μl) was used as a template for the second PCR round for Plasmodium species identification using (rFAL1 and rFAL2, rOVA-1 and rOVA2, rVIV1 and rVIV2, rMAL1 and rMAL2) primers [13]. The reaction mix contained 10 μl of MyTaq™ mix (Bioline, UK) and 0.4 μM of each primer, and the final reaction volume was made up to 20 μl by adding double distilled water. Amplification was performed under the following conditions: 95 °C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 58 °C for 2 min and 72 °C for 5 min; and final extension at 72 °C for 2 min. A known Plasmodium positive samples and a negative control sample without DNA template was used in all the reactions as positive and negative control respectively.

Data analysis

Preliminary data analysis was conducted for data exploration and cleaning to check for missing values and erroneous data entry. The statistical analysis applied in the current study was descriptive analysis and logistic regression analysis. Descriptive analysis focused on frequency, percentages, mean and standard deviation. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify significant factors associated with the outcome of malaria infection. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 24.


Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants

Table 1 shows the descriptive characteristics of the participants. A total of 380 patients with clinical suspicion of malaria were enrolled in this study. Approximately 96.1% (n = 365) of the participants were residents of Ardamata IDP camp. Amongst the study participants, 41.6% (n = 158) were males and 58.4% (n = 222) were females. Their ages ranged from 1 to 80 years, and the mean age was 21.7 years (SD = 14.1). The majority of the participants (59.5%, n = 226) belonged to the < 20 age group. More than half of the participants were single (58.9%, n = 224). Majority of them (44.5%, n = 169) reported receiving primary school education, whereas 34.7% (n = 132) were illiterate. The monthly income was < 20 USD for 14.5% (n = 55), 20–25 USD for 46.6% (n = 177), 25–30 USD for 20% (n = 76) and more than 30 USD for 18.9% (n = 72). Approximately 97.9% (n = 372) of the patients with suspected malaria had mosquito nets.

Table 1 General and socio-demographic characteristics of participants

Prevalence of malaria infection and the associated risk factors

Molecular analysis showed that approximately 61.1% (232 out of 380) of analysed samples were positive for malaria (Table 1). P. falciparum was the only prevalent species found amongst the study population (Fig. 1). None of the samples had P. vivax, P. ovale or P. malariae. The prevalence of malaria infection was higher in males (67.1%) than in females (56.8%). Gender had a statistically significant association with malaria infection (crude odds ratio [COR] = 1.55, p = .042), indicating that the males were 1.5 times more likely to have malaria infection than the females. None of the remaining factors demonstrated any significant association with malaria infection (Table 2).). For example, the unadjusted crude odds ratio of age indicated that those who are 21 years and above were 11% less likely to have malaria infection than the 20 years and below group (COR = 0.89, p value = 0.579).

Fig. 1
figure 1

DNA amplification of Plasmodium species by nPCR. Lane M: 100 bp DNA Marker. Lane NC: negative control. Lane PC: positive control. Lane 1–5: positive samples for P. falciparum t. Lane 6–8: negative control

Table 2 Factors associated with test positivity for malaria


Malaria remains one of the significant health problems in the tropical and subtropical poorest nations [14]. In Sudan, the disease is endemic, and previous studies reported a relatively high burden of the disease in many areas of the country. In this study, blood samples were collected from patients suspected to have malaria at Ardamata IDP camp. Genus- and species-specific nPCR was used as a diagnostic tool to detect the malaria parasites. A high prevalence of the malaria parasites (61.1%) was detected amongst the study participants. This percentage was remarkably high compared with the low prevalence of malaria infection detected by microscope in Dar Alsalam (5%) and Jabal Awlia (11%) camps [15], which are located in Khartoum state. This low infection rate could be attributed to the prevention and control activities of malaria in these areas. However, when a similar diagnostic method was used (nPCR), high prevalence of Plasmodium parasites was also detected amongst patients with suspected malaria recruited from different clinics in Omdurman area [16] and Kosti [17] (44.1% and 32%), respectively. The significantly high burden of malaria infection in this study may have coincided with the limited control options and availability of resources in the displaced camp. It may also be a result of the timing of sample collection due to the malaria transmission season.

Similarly, the discrepancy in disease epidemiology was also reported in other African countries. A study conducted in Ethiopia, a malaria-endemic country, revealed that the overall prevalence rate of malaria detected by microscopy was 18.4% [18]. The molecular detection of malaria parasite in Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria demonstrated that the infection rate of the disease was 34.9% [8] and 58.7% respectively [10].

In endemic areas, determination of the epidemiological pattern of the malaria infection is crucial for intervention programmes and treatment purposes. Accordingly, all the main malaria species that infect humans have been previously reported in the country [19], with a predominance of P. falciparum malaria and relatively rare P. vivax infection in regions of the study. However, most of the recent studies indicated changes in the epidemiological pattern, and a high proportion of P. vivax infections was reported [20]. The results of the current study revealed a high infection rate of P. falciparum malaria. This elevated prevalence amongst the overall study population has also been reported by previous research [21]. None of the samples of the present study were positive for P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae. However, many previous studies have demonstrated the presence of non-P. falciparum elsewhere in the country, either through single or mixed infections. For instance, out of 283 malaria-positive cases, Ageep (2013) reported that 50.2% was P. falciparum, 43.8% was P. vivax, 04.9% was P. ovale and 1.1% of the cases was P. malariae; no mixed infection was observed [19]. Recently, a remarkable increase in the recurrent relapses of malaria infections was observed in different areas in Sudan, thereby indicating a high infection rate of P. vivax malaria and making P. vivax the second important species in the country [11]. Another recent study showed that the occurrence of P. vivax malaria is high amongst suspected malaria cases, with a prevalence of 26.6% [20]. In general, the variation in the overall prevalence and species-specific malaria might be due to differences in the geography of the study area, sample size used, timing of sample collection, climate condition, study subjects, environmental factors and many other factors involved [22].

Univariate regression analysis of the risk of having malaria in suspected symptomatic participants showed that only gender was significantly associated with malaria (COR = 1.55, p = .042), and none of the remaining factors had any significant influence (Table 2).

The prevalence of malaria infection in relation to gender indicated that the males were 1.5% more likely to have malaria infection than the females. The higher prevalence observed amongst males in this study was in agreement with the findings of previous reports that showed predominance of malaria infection in males [23, 24] but contradicted other studies [25, 26]. Some hypotheses justify the increased infection rate amongst males by the fact that they are more likely to work outside compared with females; thus, men are subjected to an increased number of infected mosquito bites than females [27].

In malaria-endemic areas, protective immunity is always correlated with age. A low prevalence of malaria and low incidence of clinical symptoms are frequently observed amongst adults and older children. This concept is in line with the observations of this study, which showed that the odds of being positive for malaria decreased by 11% amongst those who are ≥ 21 years compared to the ≤ 20 years (p value = 0.579). No associations were found in the present study between malaria infection and the use of insecticide-treated bed net (ITNs). Similarly, education status and marital status did not show any significant association with malaria infection.

These findings were in contrast to other work, which showed that the use of ITNs and many socio-demographic factors are significantly associated with malaria. Recruiting only patients with suspected clinically symptomatic malaria possibly affected the results of this study. Further comprehensive surveys are required to identify the factors associated with malaria infection that were not addressed in this study.


In conclusion, results of this study indicated a high prevalence of malaria amongst the displaced participants. This study further emphasises the necessity to strengthen malaria control strategies and establish additional health facilities.

Availability of data and materials

Any further requested information regarding the experimental and data analysis during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Dried blood spot


Internally displaced persons


Insecticide-treated bed net


Nested polymerase chain reaction


Tri-EDTA buffer


  1. Lee PC, Chong ETJ, Anderios F, Lim YA, Chew CH, Chua KH. Molecular detection of human Plasmodium species in Sabah using PlasmoNex™ multiplex PCR and hydrolysis probes real-time PCR. Malar J. 2015;14:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks HM, Paul MKJ, Claude KM, Mocanu V, Hawkes MT. Use and disuse of malaria bed nets in an internally displaced persons camp in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: a mixed-methods study. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0185290.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abeku TA, Kristan M, Jones C, Beard J, Mueller DH, Okia M, Rapuoda B, Greenwood B, Cox J. Determinants of the accuracy of rapid diagnostic tests in malaria case management: evidence from low and moderate transmission settings in the East African highlands. Malar J. 2008;7(1):202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rougemont M, Van Saanen M, Sahli R, Hinrikson HP, Bille J, Jaton K. Detection of four Plasmodium species in blood from humans by 18S rRNA gene subunit-based and species-specific real-time PCR assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(12):5636–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Grabias B, Essuman E, Quakyi IA, Kumar S. Sensitive real-time PCR detection of Plasmodium falciparum parasites in whole blood by erythrocyte membrane protein 1 gene amplification. Malar J. 2019;18(1):116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mwingira F, Genton B, Kabanywanyi A-NM, Felger I. Comparison of detection methods to estimate asexual Plasmodium falciparum parasite prevalence and gametocyte carriage in a community survey in Tanzania. Malar J. 2014;13(1):433.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mbuyi T, Marie L, Bouyou-Akotet MK, Mawili-Mboumba DP. Molecular detection of Plasmodium falciparum infection in matched peripheral and placental blood samples from delivering women in Libreville, Gabon. Malar Res Treat. 2014;2014:486042.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kavunga-Membo H, Ilombe G, Masumu J, Matangila J, Imponge J, Manzambi E, Wastenga F, Ngoyi DM, Van Geetruyden J-P, Muyembe JJ. Molecular identification of Plasmodium species in symptomatic children of Democratic Republic of Congo. Malar J. 2018;17(1):334.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ehtesham R, Fazaeli A, Raeisi A, Keshavarz H, Heidari A. Detection of mixed-species infections of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax by nested PCR and rapid diagnostic tests in southeastern Iran. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93(1):181–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Oboh MA, Badiane AS, Ntadom G, Ndiaye YD, Diongue K, Ndiaye D. Molecular identification of Plasmodium species responsible for malaria reveals Plasmodium vivax isolates in Duffy negative individuals from southwestern Nigeria. Malar J. 2018;17(1):439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bereczky S, MÅrtensson A, Gil JP, FÄrnert A. Rapid DNA extraction from archive blood spots on filter paper for genotyping of Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;72(3):249–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh B, Bobogare A, Cox-Singh J, Snounou G, Abdullah MS, Rahman HA. A genus-and species-specific nested polymerase chain reaction malaria detection assay for epidemiologic studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60(4):687–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sylla K, Tine RCK, Ndiaye M, Sow D, Sarr A, Mbuyi MLT, Diouf I, Lô AC, Abiola A, Seck MC. Sero-epidemiological evaluation of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Senegal. Malar J. 2015;14(1):275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. El Mekki MA, Nea’am AA, Alghaithy AA, Elhassan MM. Prevalence and molecular identification of malaria parasite in displaced camps in Khartoum state, Sudan. Egypt Acad J Biol Sci. 2012;4(1):7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mussa A, Talib M, Mohamed Z, Hajissa K. Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 (Pf HRP2) and its effect on the performance of Pf HRP2-based rapid diagnostic tests. BMC Res Notes. 2019;2(1):334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamid MMA, Mohammed SB, El Hassan IM. Genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum field isolates in Central Sudan inferred by PCR genotyping of merozoite surface protein 1 and 2. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(2):95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Aschale Y, Mengist A, Bitew A, Kassie B, Talie A. Prevalence of malaria and associated risk factors among asymptomatic migrant laborers in West Armachiho District, Northwest Ethiopia. Res Rep Trop Med. 2018;9:95.101.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ageep AK. Diagnosis of malaria in red sea state, Sudan. Ann Trop Med Public Health. 2013;6(2):232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elgoraish AG, Elzaki SEG, Ahmed RT, Ahmed AI, Fadlalmula HA, Abdalgader Mohamed S, Abdallah NI, Abdelgadir O, Ageep TB, El-Sayed BB. Epidemiology and distribution of Plasmodium vivax malaria in Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2019;4:517–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mustafa SO, Hamid MMA, Aboud MA, Amin M, Muneer MS, Yasin K, Mahgoub NS, El Bagir NM. Genetic diversity and multiplicity of Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface protein 2 in field isolates from Sudan. F1000Research. 2017;6:1790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Suliman MMA, Hamad BM, Albasheer MMA, Elhadi M, Amin Mustafa M, Elobied M, Hamid MMA. Molecular evidence of high proportion of Plasmodium vivax malaria infection in White Nile area in Sudan. J Parasitol Res. 2016;2016

  22. Amenu D. Prevalence of malaria among patients visiting Nekemte hospital. J Med Microb Diagn. 2014;3(2):137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tadesse F, Fogarty AW, Deressa W. Prevalence and associated risk factors of malaria among adults in east Shewa zone of Oromia regional state, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nyirakanani C, Chibvongodze R, Habtu M, Masika M, Mukoko D, Njunwa KJ. Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic malaria among underfive children in Huye District, Southern Rwanda. Tanzan J Health Res. 2018;20(1).

  25. Ibekwe A, Okonko I, Onunkwo A, Ogun A, Odeze A. Comparative prevalence level of Plasmodium in freshmen (first year students) of Nnamdi Azikwe University in Awka, south-eastern, Nigeria. Malays J Microbiol. 2009;5(1):51–4.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Okonko I, Soleye F, Amusan T, Ogun A, Udeze A, Nkang A, Ejembi J, Faleye T. Prevalence of malaria plasmodium in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Malays J Microbiol. 2009;5(2):113–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Khattak AA, Venkatesan M, Nadeem MF, Satti HS, Yaqoob A, Strauss K, Khatoon L, Malik SA, Plowe CV. Prevalence and distribution of human Plasmodium infection in Pakistan. Malar J. 2013;12(1):297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the Department of Epidemiology, Tropical Medicine Research Institute, the National Centre for Research, Khartoum, Sudan, for their invaluable assistance in this study and all patients who agreed to participate in the study.


This study was supported by the Grants of the Commission of Scientific Research and Innovation, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Sudan, grant No. SRIC/2017/RP761.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



KH, AEM, ES, IKI, and ZM conceived and designed the study; HAE, AA, EN, MT, and AM conducted field and laboratory work; and AS carried out statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalid Hajissa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Research Directorate, General Directorate of planning & International Health, Federal Ministry of Health, Republic of Sudan (fmoh/nhrc/rd/rec). Written signed informed consent was obtained from each participant or their guardians/parents before his/her enrolment in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eshag, H.A., Elnzer, E., Nahied, E. et al. Molecular epidemiology of malaria parasite amongst patients in a displaced people’s camp in Sudan. Trop Med Health 48, 3 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: