Skip to main content

Multidrug-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing uropathogens in children in Bhaktapur, Nepal

Abstract

Background

The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing uropathogens has complicated the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI). Paediatric UTI is a common illness, which if not treated properly, may lead to acute and long-term complications, such as renal abscess, septicaemia, and renal scarring. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of MDR and ESBL-producing uropathogens among children.

Methods

During the study period (April 2017–April 2018), midstream urine samples were collected following aseptic procedures from children < 16 years in Siddhi Memorial Hospital. Standard culture and biochemical tests were performed to identify uropathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility test was done by modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method following Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines. ESBL-producing uropathogens were screened by ceftazidime (30 μg) and cefotaxime (30 μg) discs, and confirmed by the combination disc tests: ceftazidime + clavulanic acid (30/10 μg) or cefotaxime + clavulanic acid (30/10 μg) as recommended by CLSI.

Results

We processed 5545 non-repeated urine samples from the children with symptoms of UTI. A significant growth of uropathogens was observed in 203 samples (3.7%). The median age of the children was 24 months (interquartile range (IQR), 12–53 months). Escherichia coli (n = 158, 77.8%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 30, 14.8%) were common among the uropathogens. Among them, 80.3% were resistant to amoxycillin and 51.2% were resistant to cotrimoxazole. Most of them were susceptible to amikacin, nitrofurantoin, and ofloxacin. MDR was detected in 34.5% (n = 70/203) and ESBL producers in 24.6% (n = 50/203) of them. The proportion of MDR isolates was higher in children < 5 years (n = 59/153, 38.6%) than children ≥ 5 years (n = 11/50, 22%) (P = 0.03).

Conclusions

Nitrofurantoin, ofloxacin, and amikacin can be used for the empirical treatment for UTI in children in Bhaktapur, Nepal. MDR and ESBL-producing uropathogens are prevalent; this warrants a continuous surveillance of antimicrobial resistance.

Introduction

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common cause of illness in children. Gastrointestinal bacteria, such as Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, cause UTIs. Effective antimicrobial treatment of these infections is necessary; if untreated, they may complicate to renal abscess, septicaemia, renal scarring, and renal failures which can be life threatening in children [1, 2]. Not all UTI cases can be diagnosed with an isolation of a uropathogen and its antimicrobial susceptibility can be known; therefore, understanding the distribution of uropathogens and their resistance patterns will help the doctors and caregivers choose appropriate antibiotics for an empirical treatment [3].

The growing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens is an enormous concern. The increase in proportion of multidrug-resistance (MDR) and ESBL-producing uropathogens in children has not only limited the treatment by rendering the first-line antibiotics ineffective but also complicated the treatment by increasing the hospital stay. The problem of antimicrobial resistance has become worse in resource-limited countries where antimicrobials are available over-the-counter [4,5,6]. Surveillance of resistance patterns in these countries is thus vital to help doctors and caregivers prescribe effective treatment to patients. Such surveillance also informs policy makers to develop public health measures that may help decrease the prevalence of resistant organisms, which may decrease economic burden in the community [7,8,9].

In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalent uropathogens, their antimicrobial susceptibility, and the prevalence of MDR and ESBL producers in children attending a paediatric hospital in Nepal with symptoms of UTI.

Methods

Study design and setting

We carried out this cross-sectional study from April 14, 2017 to April 13, 2018, in the Department of Microbiology, Siddhi Memorial Hospital (SMH) in Bhaktapur, Nepal. SMH is a 50-bedded hospital that provides tertiary care to children. We included children less than 16 years of age in this study.

Laboratory methods

We collected urine specimens following aseptic procedures, such as midstream urine, catheterisation, and suprapubic aspiration from children with clinical symptoms suggestive of a possible UTI. We transported the urine samples to the laboratory immediately and processed by the semi-quantitative streaking method. We inoculated 10 μL of urine onto a cysteine lactose electrolyte deficient (CLED) agar plate using a sterile calibrated wired loop. Inoculated plates were incubated at 37 °C in aerobic conditions for 18 h. We diagnosed a UTI when we observed a significant growth (≥ 105colony-forming units/mL) of a single organism. To isolate and identify the organisms, we performed standard microbiological methods including colony morphology, Gram staining, catalase, oxidase, and in-house set of biochemical tests [10].

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

We used the modified Kirby-Bauer method to determine the susceptibility of bacterial isolates on Mueller Hinton agar (Oxoid, UK) following the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), Wayne, USA [11]. We tested common antimicrobials that we prescribe in our hospital by using these antimicrobial discs: amoxycillin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), cefazolin (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cotrimoxazole (1.25/23.7), ofloxacin (5 μg), and nitrofurantoin (300 μg). We assigned the results of susceptibility tests susceptible or resistant according to the zone size standards of CLSI. We defined MDR isolate if it showed resistance to at least one antimicrobial from the three groups of the first-line antimicrobials: beta-lactam, aminoglycoside, quinolone, sulphonamide, and nitrofuran.

Screening and confirmation of ESBL-producing isolates

We screened all Gram-negative bacilli for ESBL production. We tested the susceptibilities to third-generation cephalosporins by using ceftazidime (30 μg) and cefotaxime (30 μg) discs. As recommended by CLSI, we considered the isolates as potential ESBL producers if the zone of inhibition was ≤ 22 mm for ceftazidime or ≤ 27 mm for cefotaxime. The potential ESBL producers were then examined for confirmation by the combination disc test as the CLSI guideline. In this test, we tested the isolates against a ceftazidime (30 μg) disc and a ceftazidime + clavulanic acid (30/10 μg) combination disc, and we compared the inhibition zones around these discs. We considered that the test was positive for the confirmation of ESBL producers if the inhibition zone diameter was ≥ 5 mm larger with the combination disc than the ceftazidime disc. Similarly, we also performed the confirmation test with a cefotaxime (30 μg) disc and a cefotaxime + clavulanic acid (30/10 μg) combination disc in all potential isolates; the results were interpreted as positive if the inhibition zone diameter was ≥ 5 mm larger with the combination disc than the cefotaxime disc. Having positive results in any one of these two confirmatory tests, we confirmed the isolates as ESBL producers.

Data analysis

We analysed the data in Stata 14 (Stata Corp, Texas). The chi-squared test was used to compare the proportions of isolates between males and females, and between younger than 5 years and equal or older than 5 years.

Results

The total number of urine samples processed during the study period was 5545. The number of isolates with the significant growth was 203. The prevalence of UTIs was 3.7% among these children. The median age of the children was 24 months (IQR, 12–53 months) and there were 101 male and 102 female children. Three-quarters (n = 153, 75.3%) of isolates were from the children less than 5 years. E. coli was the most common isolated uropathogen (n = 158, 77.8%) followed by K. pneumoniae (n = 30, 14.8%) (Fig. 1). The proportion of E. coli in female children was 83.3% and 72.2% (P = 0.05) in male children. There were no significant differences in the proportions of bacterial isolates between males and females, and between children less than 5 years and the older-aged groups (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Distribution of uropathogens in children in Siddhi Memorial Hospital, Bhaktapur, Nepal. The bar graph shows the proportion of the seven types of uropathogens isolated (n = 203) from 5545 non-repeated urine samples. E. coli (77.8%) and K. pneumoniae (14.8%) were the predominant uropathogens isolated

Table 1 Distributions of uropathogens by age and sex of children in Siddhi Memorial Hospital, Bhaktapur, Nepal

We show the antimicrobial resistance patterns of the uropathogens in Table 2. E. coli was most susceptible to nitrofurantoin and amikacin, whereas K. pneumoniae was most susceptible to amikacin and ofloxacin. A high proportion of the uropathogens was resistant to amoxycillin, cefazolin, cefotaxime, and cotrimoxazole, whereas amikacin, nitrofurantoin, and ofloxacin were the antimicrobials to which most uropathogens were susceptible (Fig. 2).

Table 2 Antimicrobial resistance patterns of uropathogens in children in Siddhi Memorial Hospital, Bhaktapur, Nepal
Fig. 2
figure2

Antimicrobial resistance patterns of uropathogens in children in Siddhi Memorial Hospital, Bhaktapur, Nepal. The bar graph shows the proportion of uropathogens that showed antimicrobial resistance to commonly used eight antimicrobials in the hospital. The uropathogens were most susceptible to amikacin and nitrofurantoin and resistant to cefotaxime, cefazolin, and amoxycillin

We detected multidrug-resistance in 34.5% (n = 70/203) of the uropathogens. The proportions of MDR in male and female children were similar (n = 34/101, 33.7% in male vs n = 36/102, 35.3% in female children) (P = 0.8). We observed a higher proportion of MDR in children younger than 5 years (n = 59/153, 38.6%) than older aged group (n = 11/50, 22%) (P = 0.03) (Fig. 3). We detected ESBL producers in 24.6% (n = 50/203) of the uropathogens. The proportions of ESBL producers were not different between male (n = 28/101, 27.7%) and female children (n = 22/102, 21.6%) (P = 0.3), and between children under 5 years (n = 38/153, 24.8%) and older-aged children (n = 12/50, 24%) (P = 0.9). MDR was detected in 34.2% of E. coli and 36.7% of K. pneumoniae isolates. ESBL producers were detected in 27.2% of E. coli and 23.3% of K pneumoniae isolates (Table 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Distributions of MDR and ESBL-producing uropathogens in children. The bar graph shows the comparison of the proportions of MDR and ESBL-producing uropathogens between children < 5 years old and ≥ 5 years old. The proportions of MDR were 38.6% (n = 59/153) in < 5 years and 22% (n = 11/50) in ≥ 5 years old children (P = 0.03)

Table 3 Prevalence of MDR and ESBL-producing uropathogens in children in Siddhi Memorial Hospital, Bhaktapur, Nepal

Discussion

This study shows that E. coli and K. pneumoniae were common uropathogens in the children who attended to Siddhi Memorial Hospital, Bhaktapur, Nepal. Most of the uropathogens were resistant to the commonly prescribed antimicrobials, such as amoxycillin and cotrimoxazole, that render these antimicrobials ineffective for the empirical treatment. Multidrug-resistance and ESBL producers were detected in high proportions, and MDR was more common in children younger than 5 years than older children.

Urinary tract infections are caused by Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi [9]. E. coli and K. pneumoniae are the common causes of UTI in children and adults [9, 12]. In this study, all the isolated uropathogens were Gram-negative bacteria, 77.8% were E. coli and 14.8% were K. pneumoniae, together they comprised 92.6% of all the uropathogens. These findings were comparable with the studies from Turkey, Ethiopia, Iran, and Nepal [12,13,14,15].

Uropathogens generally reside in the gut. When the periurethral region is contaminated with these bacteria, a UTI starts by the development of colonisation of urethra and migration of the bacteria to the bladder [9]. In lack or failure of treatment, a UTI can result in serious sequelae that include renal abscess, renal scarring, and chronic renal failure [1, 2].

The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance to first-line antimicrobials for UTIs in children has increased in resource-limited countries. A systematic review on 58 observation studies shows the pooled prevalence of resistance in E. coli is higher—79.8% to ampicillin, 60.3% to co-amoxiclav, and 26.8% to ciprofloxacin—in non-OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries than the resistance of E. coli—53.4% to ampicillin, 8.2% to co-amoxiclav, and 2.1% to ciprofloxacin—in OECD countries [4]. In this study, we found that 80.3% of isolates were resistant to amoxycillin, 62.1% resistant to cefotaxime, and 51.2% resistant to cotrimoxazole. These are the first-line treatment of UTIs in children in Nepal. One of the reasons for the high prevalence of resistance to routine antibiotics is the availability of over-the-counter antimicrobials [4]. Because of the high prevalence of resistant uropathogens, the first-line antimicrobials, such as amoxycillin and cotrimoxazole, may be ineffective and only a few antimicrobials are left for effective treatment of UTIs. Our study showed that most uropathogens, which are community-acquired, in Bhaktapur, Nepal, were susceptible to nitrofurantoin, ofloxacin, and amikacin. Amoxycillin and cotrimoxazole, which are inexpensive, easily available, and have fewer side effects, can no longer be prescribed as an empirical treatment in this region due to the high level of antimicrobial resistance acquired by the uropathogens.

Increasing resistance of uropathogens to three or more groups of antimicrobials (MDR) has become a severe threat to the health care system [16]. Gram-negative bacteria that cause UTIs have developed resistance to many drug classes, including beta-lactams, aminoglycoside, and quinolones. In this study, we found 34.2% of E. coli and 36.7% of K. pneumoniae were MDR. Our findings were similar to those of Shrestha et al. who reported that 34% isolates were MDR in Dharan, a city in the eastern part of Nepal, in 2018 [17]. However, few studies in Kathmandu showed a higher proportion (52.3%, 64.9%) of MDR than our study in E. coli [12, 18]. The higher prevalence of MDR in Kathmandu than Bhaktapur may be due to bigger general hospitals in Kathmandu, where children and adults with more risk factors for MDR are treated, than in Bhaktapur. Previous antimicrobial use, previous hospitalisation, urinary catheterisation, and urinary tract anomalies are some of the known risk factors for MDR [19, 20]. We found that MDR was significantly more prevalent in children younger than 5 years than older children. One plausible explanation for this observation can be that the children younger than 5 years receive antimicrobials more often for repeated infections, such as acute respiratory infections and gastrointestinal infections, than the older children, which help the bacteria to develop resistance to multiple antimicrobials.

Infections with ESBL-producing organisms in children are associated with longer hospital stays, frequent complications, and increased mortality [21]. ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae causes one in seven (14%) UTI in children [6]. In our study, 24.6% of uropathogens were ESBL producers. Some other studies in Nepal also show a high prevalence of ESBL producers, 40% in Dharan and 38.9% in Kathmandu [17, 18]. This discrepancy of prevalence of ESBL producers may be due to the studies that were carried out in general hospitals where complicated UTI cases, including adult patients, were treated and are located in different geographical regions [6, 21]. Overall, these studies show a high prevalence of ESBL producers among uropathogens in Nepal.

This study has limitations. This study was conducted in one hospital for a period of 1 year, so the findings may not be generalisable. We could not evaluate the risk factors and outcomes of MDR and ESBL producers. The genotypes of ESBL producers could not be determined.

Conclusions

We found a high prevalence of MDR and ESBL-producing uropathogens in children in Bhaktapur, Nepal. The prevalent uropathogens were susceptible to nitrofurantoin, ofloxacin, and amikacin, some of which may be used for the empirical treatment of UTIs in children. Improved antimicrobial stewardship in hospitals and a restricted use of over-the-counter antimicrobials maybe some of the ways to decrease the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in the community.

Availability of data and materials

De-identified data of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

CLSI:

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

ESBL:

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase

MDR:

Multidrug-resistant

SMH:

Siddhi Memorial Hospital

UTI:

Urinary tract infection

References

  1. 1.

    Committee on Quality Improvement, Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection. Practice parameter: the diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of the initial urinary tract infection in febrile infants and young children. Pediatrics. 1999;103(4):843-852.

  2. 2.

    Zorc JJ, Kiddoo DA, Shaw KN. Diagnosis and management of pediatric urinary tract infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(2):417–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sorlózano-Puerto A, Gómez-Luque JM, Luna-Del-Castillo JD, Navarro-Marí JM, Gutiérrez-Fernández J. Etiological and resistance profile of bacteria involved in urinary tract infections in young children. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4909452.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bryce A, Hay AD, Lane IF, Thornton HV, Wootton M, Costelloe C. Global prevalence of antibiotic resistance in paediatric urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli and association with routine use of antibiotics in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;352:i939.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Patwardhan V, Kumar D, Goel V, Singh S. Changing prevalence and antibiotic drug resistance pattern of pathogens seen in community-acquired pediatric urinary tract infections at a tertiary care hospital of North India. J Lab Phys. 2017;9(4):264–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Flokas ME, Detsis M, Alevizakos M, Mylonakis E. Prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in paediatric urinary tract infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2016;73(6):547–57.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mishra MP, Sarangi R, Padhy RN. Prevalence of multidrug resistant uropathogenic bacteria in pediatric patients of a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. J Infect Public Health. 2016;9(3):308–14.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chander A, Shrestha CD. Prevalence of extended spectrum beta lactamase producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae urinary isolates in a tertiary care hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6:487.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, Hultgren SJ. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(5):269–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Connie R, Mahon DCL. In: Manuselis G, editor. Textbook of diagnostic microbiology. 5th ed. Missouri, USA: Elsevier; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 26th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Shakya P, Shrestha D, Maharjan E, Sharma VK, Paudyal R. ESBL production among E. coli and Klebsiella spp. causing urinary tract infection: a hospital based study. Open Microbiol J. 2017;11:23–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yüksel S, Öztürk B, Kavaz A, Özçakar ZB, Acar B, Güriz H, et al. Antibiotic resistance of urinary tract pathogens and evaluation of empirical treatment in Turkish children with urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;28(5):413–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Derbie A, Hailu D, Mekonnen D, Abera B, Yitayew G. Antibiogram profile of uropathogens isolated at Bahir Dar regional Health Research Laboratory Centre. Northwest Ethiopia. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;26:134.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Farajnia S, Alikhani MY, Ghotaslou R, Naghili B, Nakhlband A. Causative agents and antimicrobial susceptibilities of urinary tract infections in the northwest of Iran. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13(2):140–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kandil H, Cramp E, Vaghela T. Trends in antibiotic resistance in urologic practice. Eur Urol Focus. 2016;2(4):363–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shrestha LB, Baral R, Poudel P, Khanal B. Clinical, etiological and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of pediatric urinary tract infections in a tertiary care hospital of Nepal. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Parajuli NP, Maharjan P, Parajuli H, Joshi G, Paudel D, Sayami S, et al. High rates of multidrug resistance among uropathogenic Escherichia coli in children and analyses of ESBL producers from Nepal. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tenney J, Hudson N, Alnifaidy H, Li JT, Fung KH. Risk factors for aquiring multidrug-resistant organisms in urinary tract infections: a systematic literature review. Saudi Pharm J. 2018;26(5):678–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mahony M, McMullan B, Brown J, Kennedy SE. Multidrug-resistant organisms in urinary tract infections in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-019-04316-5.

  21. 21.

    Lukac PJ, Bonomo RA, Logan LK. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae in children: old foe, emerging threat. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(9):1389–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Mr Shyam Sundar Dhaubhadel, Founder of Siddhi Memorial Foundation, for providing support to carry out this study.

Funding

Siddhi Memorial Hospital and supported partly by the Kakenhi Grant (17 K16272) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. The funders did not have any role in the study design, data analysis, and interpretation of the results.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GBP, BGD, and DS conceived and designed the study. SR, UL, AS, and BBR did the laboratory work. GBP and RK prepared the first draft of the manuscript. BGD reviewed and revised the manuscript. KA and CMP supervised the study and reviewed the drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhim Gopal Dhoubhadel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We received ethical approval to conduct this study from Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu; the approval no. is 338/2018. The Ethical Board of the School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health also approved this study (approval no. NU-TMGH-124). Opt-out consent method to participate was used. Posters containing the information about the study were displayed in the hospital for the parents of the children with contact email and phone numbers of the investigators. The parents were requested to contact the investigators if they did not want their children’s urine samples to be included in the study and they were informed that only non-identifiable information of the children would be collected from the laboratory for the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raya, G.B., Dhoubhadel, B.G., Shrestha, D. et al. Multidrug-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing uropathogens in children in Bhaktapur, Nepal. Trop Med Health 48, 65 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00251-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Urinary tract infection
  • Multidrug-resistance
  •  Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase
  • E. coli
  • K. pneumoniae
  • Children
  • Nepal