Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Short Report
  • Open Access

Human infection with Plasmodium knowlesi on the Laos-Vietnam border

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 1,
  • 5,
  • 6,
  • 7,
  • 8 and
  • 9Email author
Tropical Medicine and Health201846:33

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-018-0116-7

  • Received: 12 May 2018
  • Accepted: 10 September 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Border malaria in the Greater Mekong region of Southeast Asia poses a serious threat to the health of the ethnic minority populations of the region. Traditionally thought to be caused primarily by the malaria parasites Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax, recently a zoonotic parasite, Plasmodium knowlesi, has been identified in some countries of the region. The presence of this parasite poses a challenge to malaria control programmes, as it is maintained in a zoonotic reservoir of forest-dwelling macaque monkeys.

Methods

A cross-sectional malaria parasite species prevalence survey was conducted along the Laos-Vietnam border in the central part of the two countries. Human blood samples were collected from Savannakhet in Laos and Quang Tri in Vietnam between August and October 2010 and assayed for the presence of human malaria parasite species and P. knowlesi. A PCR targeting the 18S small subunit ribosomal RNA gene and circumsporozoite protein gene was used for Plasmodium species identification.

Results

Nine cases of P. knowlesi were detected by PCR in blood samples from the Laos side and three from the Vietnam side. All P. knowlesi infections were found in co-infection with P. vivax, with some triple infections of P. knowlesi, P. vivax and P. falciparum detected in Laos. Phylogenetic analysis of these parasites suggests that P. knowlesi is circulating in the Laos-Vietnam border region.

Conclusion

This report shows that P. knowlesi is transmited on both sides of the Vietnam-Laos border. Continued monitoring of the range and prevalence of P. knowlesi on both the sides of Laos-Vietnam border is of importance to the National Malaria Control Programmes of both countries.

Keywords

  • Plasmodium knowlesi
  • Border malaria
  • Laos
  • Vietnam
  • Greater Mekong region
  • Forest
  • Monkeys
  • Human

Background

Malaria transmission in the Greater Mekong region of Southeast Asia is characterised by the spread of the parasite among people residing near, or travelling across, the numerous borders between the six countries of the region in which malaria is endemic. Often termed “border malaria”, it is characterised by transmission among and between diverse, often forest dwelling, and ethnic minority groups and may have a sylvatic component. Recently, numerous reports have documented the occurrence of infections among the human population in this region of the zoonotic malaria species, Plasmodium knowlesi, a parasite that naturally infects the Cercopithecinae Old World monkey species Macaca fascicularis, and Macaca nemestrina [15]. It is possible that the parasite is transmitted to humans in this region through the bites of the leucosphyrus group of anopheline mosquitoes, known vectors of both human and non-human primate malaria [611].

The heavily forested border area between Laos and Vietnam is home to various ethnic minority peoples [12]. These peoples engage in many forest activities as part of their way of life, mainly swidden agriculture (slash-and-burn farming), hunting and foraging. Frequent and prolonged forays into forested areas increase the risk of sylvatic and zoonotic malaria infections among these groups. In Laos, a recent case of P. knowlesi in a human has been reported from Attapeu province, near the Cambodia border [13]. However, the extent of the risk posed by P. knowlesi to humans in this region has not been addressed. The neighbouring country of Vietnam has previously reported the infection of people with P. knowlesi parasites [3], and, as the border area between Laos and Vietnam may act as a conduit for the transmission of malaria parasites between groups of people, monkeys and mosquitoes, it is conceivable that the parasite might be circulating in the border region, and so may pose a risk to the population of Laos.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional survey for malaria infection was conducted between Savannakhet, Laos and Quang Tri, Vietnam, between August and October 2010 in order to evaluate malaria parasite prevalence along the border [12]. Detailed information regarding study sites, populations surveyed, methodology of sample collection and ethics review have been published elsewhere [12]. All adult volunteers provided informed consent and for children, and consent was obtained from close relatives. Human sample analysis was approved by the ethics committee of the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University (10121662-5). Active case detection (ACD) was conducted during the survey in 400 randomly selected households from 22 villages on the Vietnam side and from 14 villages on the Laos side. The Laotian and Vietnamese villages are separated by a shallow river around 50-m wide and are surrounded by forested mountains. A small number of villagers keep young macaque monkeys caught in the nearby forest as pets. The people that live in this region, on both sides of the border, are a minority ethnic group known as the Van Kieu in Vietnamese [14] and the Tri in Lao, who have special permission from the governments of Laos and Vietnam to freely cross the border.

The samples used in this study were collected as previously described [12]. A total of 3059 samples (Laos, 1256; Vietnam, 1803) were analysed by microscopy for the presence of malaria parasites (Table 1). Questionnaires were used to collect information such as addresses, medical examination results and treatment records, and blood was collected by finger-prick; thick blood films were made for microscopy, and blood was applied to filter paper for molecular analyses. Blood smears were examined by local microscopists at the provincial malaria laboratories of each country and then crosschecked. Each blood-spotted filter paper was immediately air dried, placed in a sealed plastic bag and stored at room temperature. All malaria cases were treated as per the national guidelines for malaria treatment of each country.
Table 1

Number of samples for this study and results of microscopic examination [12]

 

Laos

Vietnam

No. of blood examinations

1256

1803

No. of Plasmodium spp. positive by microscopy

63

33

Detected Plasmodium species by microscopy

P. falciparum

30

18

P. vivax

32

14

P. falciparum + P. vivax

1

1

No. of microscopy positive by age group

 ≤ 5 years

12

5

 6–14 years

33

12

 ≥ 15 years

18

16

No. of microscopy positive by gender

 Male

30

18

 Female

33

15

A of total 135 samples (Laos, 110; Vietnam, 25) were used for PCR analysis (Table 2). DNA was extracted from dried blood samples on filter paper, and subsequent PCR analysis was carried out as previously described [14, 15]. Briefly, each dried blood spot was cut into small pieces by a razor blade. The razor blade was cleaned with alcohol wipes and flamed at every sample cut to prevent contamination and to inactivate DNase. gDNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA micro kit (QIAGEN, Tokyo, Japan). Plasmodium species-specific nested PCR assays to identify human, and P. knowlesi were performed as described [10]. The genus-specific primers, rPLU-1/rPLU-5, were used in the primary amplification (nest 1) and performed as described by Singh et al. (1999) [15]. Detection of species-specific 18S rRNA genes (nest 2) was performed as previously described [5, 15, 16]. For the nest 2, 2 μL of × 50 nest 1 amplification product was used as the template in the reaction mixtures (25 μL). PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. DNA bands were analysed with Lane & Spot Analyzer software (Atto, Tokyo, Japan).
Table 2

Summary Plasmodium species of human blood collected Laos and Vietnam by PCR analysis

 

Laos

Vietnam

Microscopy (+)

Microscopy (−)

Microscopy (+)

No. of examined by PCR

35

75

25

No. of Plasmodium spp. positive by PCR

35

30

25

Detected Plasmodium species by PCR

P. falciparum

21

12

16

P. vivax

0

9

2

P. falciparum + P. vivax

5

6

4

P. falciparum + P. malariae

2

0

0

P. vivax + P. knowlesi

1

1

3

P. falciparum + P. vivax + P. malariae

1

0

0

P. falciparum + P. vivax + P. knowlesi

5

2

0

No. of PCR positive by age group

 ≤ 5 years

10

8

4

 6–14 years

14

9

5

 ≥ 15 years

11

13

16

No. of PCR positive by gender

 Male

16

10

14

 Female

19

20

11

For the detection of the P. knowlesi 18S rRNA gene, two kinds of primer sets, pmk8/pmk9 [16] and Kn1f/Kn3r [5], were used. It is known that the primer set Pmk8/Pmk9 can occasionally cross-react with P. vivax DNA and produce false-positive results whereas primer set Kn1f /Kn3r does not (Additional file 1). For confirmation of P. knowlesi infection, detection of the P. knowlesi circumsporozoite protein (CSP) gene was carried out as previously described by Vythilingam et al. (2008) [17]. Primer sequences for 18S rRNA of human malaria parasites and P. knowlesi-specific primers and the CSP gene of P. knowlesi were as previously described [5, 1517]. P. knowlesi H strain DNA (American Type Culture Collection no. 30158) was used as a positive control. We verified that no cross-reaction occurred between the primer sets used to amplify P. vivax CSP and P. knowlesi CSP by using DNA extracted from single infections of both species (data not shown). A sample was only considered positive for P. knowlesi if all three assays (pmk8/pmk9, Kn1f/Kn3r and PkCSP) gave a positive result.

For nucleotide sequencing, the specific products resulting from PCR amplification of the CSP and 18S rRNA genes were cleaned using the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-up System (Promega, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and were then sequenced with the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Premix Kit (Applied Biosystems, Inc.). The reaction products for sequencing were separated with an ABI/Hitachi 3130 × 1 Genetic Analyzer (ABI), and the resulting nucleotide sequences were compiled using Genetyx (Genetyx Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Results and discussion

In Laos, 1256 persons were recruited for microscopic blood examination, of which 63 (5%) were positive for malaria parasites, 30 for Plasmodium falciparum and 32 for Plasmodium vivax with one mixed infection (P. falciparum + P. vivax) (Table 1). Parasite prevalence was highest in the southern part of the study area, and children under 15 years old were significantly more likely to carry parasites than adults. Of 63 malaria positive cases, 35 samples were available for molecular screening of P. knowlesi and human malaria parasites (Table 2). In order to thoroughly screen for P. knowlesi, 75 slide-negative samples collected from family members of microscopy positive patients were also screened. Plasmodium knowlesi infection was assayed using three PCRs, two based on the 18S rRNA gene and one on the CSP gene. Only samples positive for all three assays were considered to be P. knowlesi positive (Additional file 1). Nine out of 110 samples were positive for P. knowlesi (Table 2). Six were detected among the 35 microscopic positive samples (17%) and three cases among the three microscopic negative samples (3%). Plasmodium knowlesi was exclusively detected in samples collected from children aged 2 to 10 years old and was always found in co-infection with either P. falciparum or P. vivax (Table 3). In two cases, we observed P. knowlesi infection of two family members simultaneously: cases 3 and 4, and cases 8 and 9 were infections of brothers in the same families (Table 3).
Table 3

Characteristics of people infected with Plasmodium knowlesi

Country

Case

Age

Family no.

Gender

Microscopy

Parasites by PCR

Temperature (°C)

Laos

1

2

11020

Male

(−)

Pk + Pv

38.4

2

5

13008

Female

Pv

Pk + Pv

36.0

3

5

14013

Female

Pf

Pk + Pv + Pf

36.5

4

5

14013

Male

(−)

Pk + Pv + Pf

35.8

5

5

14014

Female

(−)

Pk + Pv + Pf

37.8

6

5

14017

Female

Pv

Pk + Pv + Pf

36.5

7

7

14108

Male

Pf

Pk + Pv + Pf

37.0

8

8

14034

Male

Pv

Pk + Pv + Pf

37.0

9

10

14034

Male

Pv

Pk + Pv + Pf

36.5

Vietnam

1

4

N/A

Male

Pv

Pk + Pv

N/A

2

11

N/A

Male

Pv

Pk + Pv

N/A

3

15

N/A

Female

Pv

Pk + Pv

N/A

Pv Plasmodium vivax, Pk P. knowlesi, Pf P. falciparum, N/A not available

In Vietnam, of 1803 persons recruited for microscopic blood examination, and 35 (2%) were positive for malaria parasites. Of these, 18 were infected with P. falciparum, 14 with P. vivax, and one with a P. falciparum + P. vivax mixed infection (Table 1). Malaria prevalence was highest in the southern villages, as in Laos. Of the 35 microscopic positive cases, 25 blood samples were available for PCR analysis for the identification of Plasmodium spp. Three out of these 25 samples (12%) were positive for P. knowlesi, all in co-infections with P. vivax (Table 2).

Molecular diagnosis of P. knowlesi was performed by the independent amplification of two genes (18S rRNA and csp), and PCR products were sequenced for confirmation of diagnosis. This molecular diagnosis was carried out independently at three separate institutions. Twelve out of 135 samples examined by PCR were confirmed as P. knowlesi through sequencing of the CSP and 18S rRNA gene (Fig. 1 and Additional file 2). All the P. knowlesi parasites detected in this study were found in co-infections with P. vivax, either in dual-species infections or (but only in Laos) triple-species infections along with P. falciparum and P. vivax (Table 2). We did not detect any dual infections of P. knowlesi with P. falciparum (Table 2), and similar findings have been previously reported in Vietnam [3]. No single P. knowlesi infections were found in this study, although a single P. knowlesi infection case was recently reported from Attapeu province (adjacent to Cambodia), Laos [13].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree constructed from the nucleotide sequences of the CSP gene of Plasmodium spp. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model. Number of substitutions per site is indicated by the scale bar. Bootstrap values were calculated for 1000 replications. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using MEGA7. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site

All the P. knowlesi infections in this study were detected in children under 15 years old. In contrast, infection with human malaria parasites often occurred in people older than 15 (Tables 2 and 3), and a similar tendency was reported in Southern Vietnam [3]. This may be a consequence of age-related acquired immunity against the parasites, as well as the fact that our analysis was skewed towards children [12]. The body temperature of children carrying P. knowlesi was normal except cases 1 and 5 (Table 3), although the cyclical nature of malarial fever means that the timing of temperature monitoring is crucial, and it is possible that fever episodes in these individuals were missed. The asymptomatic presentation of P. knowlesi infection described here differs from the symptomatic infections observed in Malaysia, where individuals infected with P. knowlesi suffer malaria disease and occasionally develop severe illness [18]. It is possible that this difference is a consequence of the fact that P. knowlesi was only found in co-infections with P. vivax in our study. Other factors that could contribute to this difference include the genetics of the parasites and their hosts, and transmission intensities.

It is known that M. fascucularis and M. nemestrina are natural hosts of multiple species of non-human primate malaria parasites [5, 1921]. These macaques are present in the study area [20, 21] where Anopheles dirus and Anopheles minimus, known vectors of P. knowlesi [3, 10, 11, 22], have previously been captured [12]. The presence of monkey reservoirs and competent mosquito vectors is consistent with the hypothesis that P. knowlesi infection of humans here is a zoonotic phenomenon, although human-human transmission cannot be excluded.

Conclusions

This molecular epidemiological study describes the presence of multiple natural human infections of P. knowlesi in Laos. We also report that P. knowlesi is transmitted on both sides of the Vietnam-Laos border—although the villages are so near to each other that it would have been odd if it occurred only the one side of the river. Although P. knowlesi has not been widely reported in Southeast Asia, it has the potential to cause severe disease in humans, and so, its prevalence should be closely monitored [18]. Furthermore, as humans continue to encroach into previously uninhabited regions, and contact between monkey, mosquito and human populations becomes more frequent, P. knowlesi and, potentially, other macaque malaria parasite species, have the potential to become more prevalent in the human population. Therefore, continued monitoring of the range and prevalence of P. knowlesi is of importance to the National Malaria Control Programmes of both countries.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the support of the staff of Preventive Medicine Center Quang Tri Province, Vietnam, and Savannakhet Provincial Malaria Station, Laos, and local authorities, and thank the volunteers who participated in this study.

Funding

This study was partly supported by the following four grants: (i) the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Asia Africa Science Platform Program; (ii) JSPS KAKENHI grant number 23406022; (iii) the Cooperative Research Grants from Joint Usage/Research Centre on Tropical Disease, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University (2011-Ippan-7); and (iv) the RINH project and the Medical Committee Netherlands-Vietnam (MCNV) in collaboration with the Savannakhet and Quang Tri provincial health department.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. Nucleotide sequences generated in this work have been deposited at GenBank. GenBank accession numbers are KJ748410 for Vietnam 137 (Hu-QT137-2010-Vietnam) as representative Vietnam specimen and KJ748411 for Laos 933 (Hu-S11020933-2010-Laos) as representative Laos specimen.

Authors’ contributions

TP, HH, LT, PP, RPM and KM conceived and designed the study. TP, HH, LT, PP, RPM and KM performed the field work and data collection. YM, TP, HH, RPM, RC, SK and SN performed the experiments. YM, TP, HH, RPM, RC, SK and SN performed the statistical analysis. TP, YM, RC, SK, RPM, SN, HH, LT, PP and KM wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was reviewed and approved by the research ethics committee of the Provincial Health Department of Savannakhet and the Provincial Health Department of Quang Tri. Human sample analysis was approved by the ethics committee, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University (10121662-5). All adult volunteers provided informed consent, and for children, consent was obtained from close relatives.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Savannakhet Provincial Health Department, Savannakhet, Laos
(2)
Malaria Unit, Department of Pathology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan
(3)
Faculty of Public Health, Da Nang University of Medical Technology and Pharmacy, Da Nang, Vietnam
(4)
Malaria-Parasitology and Entomology Department, Preventive Medicine Center of Quang Tri province, Quang Tri province, Vietnam
(5)
Khanh Phu Malaria Research Unit, Medical Committee Netherlands-Viet Nam, Nha Trang, Khanh Hoa Province, Vietnam
(6)
Laboratory of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan
(7)
Graduate School of Tropical Medicine & Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan
(8)
Department of Protozoology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan
(9)
Department of Virology and Parasitology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Kutsukake, Toyoake Aichi, 470-1192, Japan

References

  1. Jongwuiwes S, Putaporntip C, Iwasaki T, Sata T, Kanbara H. Naturally acquired Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in human, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1012.040293.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Van den Eede P, Van HN, Van Overmeir C, Vythilingam I, Duc TN, Hung LX, et al. Human Plasmodium knowlesi infections in young children in center Vietnam. Mal J. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-249.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Marchand RP, Culleton R, Maeno Y, Quang NT, Nakazawa S. Co-infections of Plasmodium knowlesi, P. falciparum, and P. vivax among humans and Anopheles dirus mosquitoes, Souththern Vietnam. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1707.101551.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jiang N, Chang Q, Sun X, Yin J, Zhang Z, Wahlgren M, Chen Q. Co-infections with Plasmodium knowlesi and other malaia parasites, Myanmar. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1609.100339.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee KS, Divis PC, Zakaria SK, Matusop A, Julin RA, Conway DJ, Cox-Singh J, Singh B. Plasmodium knowlesi: reservoir hosts and tracking the emergence in humans and macaques. PLoS Pathog. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Nakazawa S, Marchand RP, Quang NT, Culleton R, Manh ND, Maeno Y. Anophles dirus co-infection with human and monkey malaria parasites in Vietnam. Int J Parasitol. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/jipara.2009.08.005.
  7. Vythilingam I, Tan CH, Asmad M, Chan ST, Lee KS, Singh B. Natural transmission of Plasmodium knowlesi to humans by Anopheles latens in Sarawak, Malaysia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.02.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Tan CH, Vythilingam I, Matusop A, Chan ST, Singh B. Bionomics of Anopheles latens in Kapit, Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo in relation to the transmission of zoonotic simian malaria parasite Plasmodium knowlesi. Malar J. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Trung HD, Bortel WV, Sochantha T, et al. Malaria transmission and major malaria vectors in different geographical areas of South East Asia. Trop Med Int Health. 2004; doi:org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01378. x.
  10. Maeno Y, Quang NT, Culleton R, Kawai S, Masuda G, Nakazawa S, Marchand RP. Humans frequently exposed to a range of non-human primate malaria parasite species through the bites of Anopheles dirus mosquitoes in South-Central Vietnam. Parasit Vectors. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0995-y.
  11. Maeno Y. Molecular epidemiology of mosquitoes for the transmission of forest malaria in South-Central Vietnam. Trop Med Health. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0065-6.
  12. Pongvongsa T, Ha H, Thanh L, Marchand R, Nonaka D, Tojo B, Phongmany P, Moji K, Kobayashi J. Joint malaria survey lead toward improved cross-border cooperation between Savannakhet province, Laos and Quang Tri province, Vietnam. Mal J. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-262.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Iwagami M, Nakatsu M, Khattignavong P, Soundala P, Lorphachan L, Keomalaphet S, Xangsayalath P, Kawai S, Hongvanthong B, Brey PT, Kano S. First case of human infection with Plasmodium knowlesi in Laos. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006244.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. World Health Organization. Health and ethnic minorities in Viet Nam. In: Technical Series No 1. Hanoi: World Health Organization Viet Nam; 2003.Google Scholar
  15. Singh B, Bobogare A, Cox-Singh J, Snounou G, Abdullah MS, Rahman HA. A genus- and species-specific nested polymerase chain reaction malaria detection assay for epidemiologic studies. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60:687–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Singh B, Kim Sung L, Matusop A, Radhakrishnan A, Shamsul SSG, Cox-Singh J, et al. A large focus of naturally acquired Plasmodium knowlesi infections in human beings. Lancet. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15836-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Vythilingam I, Noorazian YM, Huat TC, Jiram AI, Yusri YM, Azahari AH, et al. Plasmodium knowlesi in humans, macaques and mosquitoes in peninsular Malaysia. Parasit Vectors. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-1-26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Cox-Singh J, Hiu J, Lucas SB, Dvis PC, Zulkarnaen M, Chandra P, et al. Severe malaria-a case of fatal Plasmodium knowlesi infection with post-mortem findings: a case report. Malaria J. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-9-10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang X, Kadir KA, Quintanilla-Zariñan LF, Villano J, Houghton P, Du H, Singh B, Smith DG. Distribution and prevalence of malaria parasites among long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in regional populations across Southeast Asia. Malar J. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1494-0.
  20. Singh B, Daneshvar C. Human infections and detection of Plasmodium knowlesi. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00079-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Huffman MA, Satou M, Kawai S, Maeno Y, Kawamoto Y, Quang NT, Nakazawa S. New perspectives on the transmission of malaria between macaques and humans: the case of Vietnam. Folia Primatol. 2013;84:288–9.Google Scholar
  22. White GB. Malaria vector ecology and genetics. Br Med Bull. 1982;38:207–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement