Authors (year) | Country | Antimicrobial susceptibility of the bacterial Isolates | MDR Pattern of Bacterial isolates |
---|---|---|---|
Asfaw et al. 2021 [21] | Ethiopia | Not reported | The overall multidrug resistance prevalence was 42.9% -Bacterial isolates (CoNS, E. coli) showed higher resistance to Penicillin (84%), Ampicillin (81%), and Tetracycline (42%) |
Gashaw et al. 2014 [44] | Ethiopia | About 87.5% of S. aureus, 89.3% of CONS, and all S. pyogenes isolates were sensitive to Ciprofloxacin E. coli was 100% sensitive to Ciprofloxacin, Gentamycin, and Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole | -More than half (52.2%) and 60.9% of Gram-positive bacteria were resistant to Amoxicillin and Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole -E. cloacae were 100% resistant to Ceftriaxone, Ciprofloxacin, Amoxicillin, and Chloramphenicol |
Misgana et al. 2014 [43] | Ethiopia | The antimicrobial susceptibility of CoNS was 55.60% for methicillin, and S. aureus was 70.30% for Vancomycin | -About 39.40% of S. aureus isolates were MRSA, of which 38.50% were Vancomycin-resistant |
Bodena et al. 2019 [45] | Ethiopia | Ceftriaxone (80.6%), Ciprofloxacin (77.3%), and Gentamicin (72.7%) showed higher activity against bacterial isolates (CONS, E. coli and S.aureus) | The overall prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR) bacterial isolates was 69.9% Amongst all the bacterial isolates, Pseudomonas sp. (87.5%), Klebsiella sp. (86.7%), and Citrobacter sp. (75%) showed MDR |
Araya et al. 2021 [23] | Ethiopia | Citrobacter and E. coli are sensitive to Chloramphenicol and Cotrimoxazole | About 79.2% of the ESBL-producing isolates showed multidrug resistance K. oxytoca, Salmonella spp., P. vulgaris, and P.mirabilis showed 100% multidrug resistance |
Mohamedin et al. 2019 [46] | Egypt | About 100% of S. aureus was sensitive to Kanamycin and Trimethoprim–sulphamethoxazole | Around 98.2% of S.aureus was resistant to Methicillin, Oxacillin, and Ampicillin antibiotics |
Mohamadou et al. 2021 [52] | Cameroon | Ceftazidim, Norfloxacin, Imipeneme, Netilmicin and Azthreonam) were efficient against the P. aeruginosas | The prevalence of MDR (≥ 3 antibiotic classes) of identified bacteria (S. aureus and Gram-negative bacteria) was 71.4% |
Daoudi et al. 2017 [53] | Morocco | Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus sensible to Methicillin | Staphylococcus aureus strains were methicillin-resistant |
Nwankwo et al. 2014 [20] | Nigeria | 42.8% and 71.4% of S.aureus was sensitive to Amoxicillin and Gentamicin, respectively | High level of bacterial isolates (S.aureus, S. epidermidis) resistance against Cotrimoxazole, Tetracycline and Ampicillin, Gentamicin, Ceftriaxone, and Ciprofloxacin |
Akinyemi et al. 2009 [54] | Nigeria | Over 75% of the isolates (CONS, E. coli and S.aureus, were susceptible to the Fluoroquinolone and Ceftriaxone antibiotics | Not reported |
Bobat et al. 2016 [55] | South Africa | All of the S. aureus isolated were Methicillin/Cloxacillin sensitive | Not reported |
Osman et al. 2018 [56] | Sudan | 40% of Staphylococcus aureus isolates' sensitivity to Oxacillin | Staphylococcus aureus isolates were 98.6% resistant to Oxacillin |
Tusabe et al. 2021 [57] | Uganda | All bacterial isolates (E. coli Micrococcus spp, CoNS, and Bacillus spp) are susceptible to gentamicin | About 60%, 80% and 90% of the CoNS isolates were resistant to Ciprofloxacin, penicillin, and cotrimoxazole, respectively |
Mushabati et al. 2021 [24] | Zambia | S. aureus was susceptible to Ciprofloxacin (88%), Clindamycin (88%), Gentamicin (84%), Cotrimoxazole (50%) and Erythromycin (50%) | Resistance to cefoxitin was detected in 25% of S. aureus and 48% of CoNS |