Skip to main content

Table 2 Knowledge on adverse medical events (n = 221)

From: Experiences of frontline nurses with adverse medical events in a regional referral hospital in northern Ghana: a cross-sectional study

Knowledge proxies on AMEs

Professional category

Professional (n = 133)

Auxiliary (n = 88)

Total

p value

Mean (SD)**

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Types of AMEs

3.3 (0.97)

3.1 (1.10)

3.2 (1.00)

0.0819

Risk to exposure to AMEs

3.4 (0.92)

3.0 (0.92)

3.2 (0.93)

0.0055*

Advocacy on AMEs

3.2 (0.92)

2.9 (0.97)

3.1 (0.95)

0.0190*

Reporting of AMEs

3.2 (0.99)

3.2 (1.10)

3.2 (1.00)

0.7996

Actions following exposure to AMEs

3.1 (0.97)

2.9 (0.94)

3.0 (0.96)

0.2201

Employer’s role on AMEs

3.0 (1.00)

2.8 (1.10)

2.9 (1.00)

0.0889

Recognition of exposure to AMEs

3.4 (0.96)

3.1 (1.10)

3.3 (1.00)

0.0548

Overall knowledge score on AMEs

3.2 (0.70)

3.0 (0.70)

3.1 (0.71)

0.0346*

  1. Source: field data (2018)
  2. Legend:
  3. *Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney two-tailed test of hypothesis at 95% confidence level
  4. **Means and standard deviations derived from the summated 5-point Likert scale items on knowledge levels on AMEs from 1 “very poor” to 5 “excellent;” thus, higher mean scores depict better knowledge levels on AMEs and vice versa