Skip to main content

Table 2 Subgroup analysis of FUS prevalence according to year, country, type of sample, type of symptoms and diagnostic methods

From: Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published literature (2016–2020)

Subgroup variable

Prevalence % (95% CI)

I2 (%)

Heterogeneity (Q)

P-value

Interaction test (X2)

P-value

Year

 2016

14.6 (11.3–18.6)

96.3%

1034.7

< 0.01

375.3

< 0.01

 2017

17.5 (12–24.9)

97.8%

1055.2

< 0.01

  

 2018

19.0 (13.1–26.7)

98.8%

2179.6

< 0.01

  

 2019

21.7 (16.8–27.5)

93.4%

274.7

< 0.01

  

 2020

28.6 (13.1–51.6)

97.1%

138.2

< 0.01

  

Country

 Ghana

9.1 (6.8–12.2)

73.46%

11.31

 < 0.01

  

 Malawi

11.4 (0.8–15.4)

70.62%

6.81

 < 0.01

  

 Nigeria

21.1 (17.6–25.0)

96.9%

2337.91

 < 0.01

  

 South Africa

27.4 (25.6–29.2)

92.53%

80.36

< 0.01

  

 Sudan

55.8 (43.9–67.1)

97.59%

374.17

< 0.01

430.6

 < 0.01

 Egypt

1.7 (0.1–32.8)

83.57

5.90

< 0.01

  

Type of sample

 Urine

17.2 (14.5–20.3)

98.11%

5949.4

< 0.01

1285.2

 > 0.05

 Vaginal lavage

25.0 (11.4–46.1)

98.2%

110.40

< 0.01

  

Type of symptoms

 Hematuria

19.4 (12.2–29.4)

92.33%

52.19

 < 0.01

82.4

 < 0.01

 Proteinuria

13.6 (6.69–24.8)

0.00

= 1.00

  

Diagnostic method

 Direct microscopy

17.1 (14.5–20.1)

98.1%

6013

< 0.01

350.6

< 0.01

 Filtration and microscopy

18.2 (5.9–43.9)

99.1%

563.1

< 0.01

  

 PCR

15.3 (6.1–33.2)

95.9%

24.64

< 0.01

  

 Sedimentation and microscopy

11.4 (3.6–30.9)

96.6%

59.5

< 0.01