Skip to main content

Table 4 Bivariate analysis of the associations between household-level characteristics

From: Individual and household factors associated with incidences of village malaria in Xepon district, Savannakhet province, Lao PDR

Characteristics

Respondents in cases (n = 90)

Respondents in controls (n = 88)

p valuea

n

%

n

%

Number of household members

 < 5

27

30.0

27

30.7

0.994

 5–7

40

44.4

39

4.3

 

 ≥ 8

23

25.6

22

25.0

 

 Median (interquartile range)

6

4–8

6

4–8

 

Household that hung a bed net

 No

0

0.0

4

4.5

0.058

 Yes

90

100

84

95.5

 

Household that hung long-lasting insecticide-treated bed net

 No

3

3.3

9

10.2

0.079

 Yes

87

96.7

79

89.8

 

Person per net ratio

 ≤ 2.5

49

54.4

44

52.4

0.879

 > 2.5

41

45.6

40

47.6

 

Type of water used for daily life

 Stream water

41

45.6

44

50.0

0.653

 Water other than stream water

49

54.4

44

50.0

 

Wealth index quartiles

 First (least poor)

19

21.1

30

34.1

0.121

 Second

21

23.3

22

25.0

 

 Third

18

20.0

17

19.3

 

 Fourth (poorest)

32

35.6

19

21.6

 

Wall materials

 Brick

48

53.3

45

51.1

0.881

 Other

42

46.7

43

48.9

 

Flooring materials

 Wood

71

78.8

56

63.6

0.031

 Other

19

21.1

32

36.4

 

Roofing materials

 Zinc

82

91.1

73

83.0

0.121

 Other

8

8.9

15

17.0

 

Open space in the house (size larger than A4 sheet)

 No

20

22.2

44

50.0

< 0.001

 Yes

70

77.8

44

50.0

 

Percent of open spaces in the house (%)

 ≤ 10

23

32.9

13

29.5

0.837

 > 10

47

67.1

31

70.5

 

 Median (interquartile range)

11.2

0.9–21.5

0.6

0.0–18.4

 

Kitchen location

 Inside the house

58

64.4

61

69.3

0.527

 Outside the house

32

35.6

27

30.7

 

Cattle keeping near the house

 No

53

58.9

58

65.9

0.357

 Yes

37

41.1

30

34.1

 

Weed management within 10 m around the house

 Poor

52

57.8

42

47.7

0.230

 Good

38

42.2

46

52.3

 
  1. aFisher’s exact test