Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of qualitative results

From: The usefulness of traditional birth attendants to women living with HIV in resource-poor settings: the case of Mfuwe, Zambia

Respondent group

Global theme

Organizing theme

Basic findings from the FGDs and interviews

Characterization of TBAs by HIV+ women who had accessed trained TBAs

Quality of care

Quality of care

•TBAs provide personalized care

•TBAs provide continuous care from antenatal, labor, and postnatal

•TBAs help in promoting adherence to treatment

•Provided supportive logistic and services

Limitations in quality

•Lack of skills to handle complications

•Lack of medical supplies and equipment to prevent mother to child transmission

Efficiency

Efficiency

•Provided psychological, emotional, and economic support

•Referred and facilitated transportation to facilities

•TBAs work to end stigma, discrimination, and patriarchy through advocacy

Using advocacy to challenge structural drivers to poor maternal health outcomes e.g., stigma, discrimination, and patriarchy

Limitations in efficiency

•Lack of advanced medical equipment and supplies

Affordability

Affordability

•Were cheaper and in some cases free

•Payment or token of appreciation was not mandatory

Limitations in affordability

•N/A

Access

Access

•Easily accessible

•Lives within the community

•Always available to provide care from antenatal to postnatal

Limitations to access

•N/A

Characterization of TBAs by HIV+ women who had never accessed trained TBAs

Quality of care

Quality of care

•Less verbally and physically abusive than professionals in facilities

•Provision of personalized care

•More guaranteed support from antenatal until postpartum

•Do provide resources and food

•More friendly and caring than facility-based care

Limitations in quality

•Professionals have more knowledge and skills to handle complications than trained TBAs

•Professionals have access to equipment and medical supplies that can deal with HIV vulnerability during pregnancy but TBAs do not

Efficiency

Efficiency

•N/A

Limitations in efficiency

•TBAs cannot help in PMTCT

•TBAs cannot help easily conduct HIV tests

•TBAs cannot help in the provision of ARVs

•TBAs cannot help in conducting cesarean births

Affordability

Affordability

•TBAs are cheaper than institutions where they require women to pay clinical fees

•TBAs are cheaper as they do not require the patient to buy her own bucket, delivery bags

Limitations in affordability

•N/A

Access

Access

•Always available when called upon

•Follow the patients to their home

Limitations to access

•N/A

Characterization of trained TBAs by trained TBAs

Quality of care

Quality of care

•Provide pragmatic services in the form of psychological and emotional support

•Provide adherence-to-treatment support

•Provide useful maternal health information

•Help in providing priority attention to HIV-positive women upon recommendation at the facility

Limitations in quality

•Limitation in skills

•Lack of access to medical supplies and equipment

Efficiency

Efficiency

•Protection from domestic violence and abuse

•Provide useful information regarding maternal health promotion and nutrition

•Provide transportation where possible to facilities

•Help in providing priority attention to HIV-positive women upon recommendation at the facility

Limitations in efficiency

•N/A

Affordability

Affordability

•Cheap

•No fees required

Limitations in affordability

•N/A

Access

Access

•Readily available to communities

•Provide services to everyone including those who would have otherwise been left unattended to

•They view their work as a civic duty to the community

Limitations to access

•N/A

Policy

Provide referral services

•Provide transportation where possible to facilities

•Help in providing priority attention to HIV-positive women upon recommendation at the facility

Advantages of government policy on TBAs

•N/A

Limitations as a result of government policy on TBAs

•Lack of support from government due to promotion of facility-based policy creates cooperation problems with professionals

•Obscures training opportunities for TBAs

•In conflict with government policy

Professional’s characterization of trained TBAs

Quality of care

Quality of care

•Can provide soft services, e.g., psychological and emotional support including treatment adherence support

•Provision of referrals services

Limitations in quality

•As opposed to TBAs, professionals can conduct completed procedures such as cesarean births

•As opposed to TBAs, professionals can effectively handle complications

•Have access to life-serving medical equipment used to conduct complicated operations

Affordability

Affordability

More affordable than institutions

Limitations in affordability

•N/A

Efficiency

Efficiency

•N/A

Limitations in efficiency

Inadequate funding to cooperation between TBAs and professionals

Policy

Advantages of government policy on TBAs

•N/A

Limitations as a result of government policy on TBAs

•Policy frustrates cooperation between professionals and TBAs

•Counterproductive government policy on TBAs

•Creates barriers in accessing the most vulnerable women in remote areas