Skip to main content

Table 1 A bibliographic summary of the differences between diffuse-CL and disseminated-CL cutaneous leishmaniasis in the New and Old Worlds

From: Diffuse and disseminated cutaneous leishmaniasis: clinical cases experienced in Ecuador and a brief review

Characteristics

DCL

DSL

Main agents

  

 In the New World

L. (L.) amazonensis

L. (V.) braziliensis group

 

L. (L.) mexicana

L. (L.) mexicana group

 In the Old World

L. (L.) aethiopica

No specific case reports other than HIV co-infection

 

L. (L.) major

No. of parasites in lesions/smears

Massive/abundant in smear (uncontrolled parasite growth)

Scanty/rare in smear

Leishmanin skin test

Negative/poor (specifically anergic to Leishmania antigen; lack of cell-mediated immunity)

Strongly positive

Reaction to TB, PPD, and other antigens

Yes

Yes

Antibody response

Elevated, rK39+a

Elevated, rK39+a

Ulceration of lesions

Never (non-necrotizing)

Frequent (necrotizing)

Coalescence to form plaques

Frequent

Rare

Type of lesions

Nodules, papules, plaques, macules, erythema

Papules, nodules, ulcers (mixture of small lesions)

Typical lesion

Lepromatous

Acneiform

Response to drug/therapy

Resistant/poor, relapse frequently

Good/poor

Infection/clinical course

Chronic, persist 20 years or more, for a life long

Not chronic

Analogous to lepromatous leprosy

Yes

No

Affected ages and sex

All ages and sexes

Young adults, maleb

No. of lesions

Often innumerable, plaques on body surface

0–300b, 308c, 425d, 745e

Mucosal involvement

No

Frequentb

Disease entity

Rare, less than 0.1 % of total CL in Venezuelaf

Less than 2 % of CLb

  1. aHashiguchi et al., unpublished data
  2. bTuretz et al. [7]
  3. cLazo and Hashiguchi [15]
  4. dCouppie et al. [30]
  5. eSousa et al. [31]
  6. fConvit et al. [28]