Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) in and surrounding areas of Lake Tana, northwest Ethiopia

Tropical Medicine and Health volume 51, Article number: 3 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Vector control is the most effective malaria control and prevention measure. Among these, IRS and LLINs are the most important chemical insecticide interventions used in malaria prevention and control strategies in Ethiopia. However, the long-term effectiveness of these strategies is under threat due to the emergency and spread of insecticide resistance in the principal malaria vector. Therefore, this study was carried out, under standardized laboratory conditions to assess the killing effect of some insecticides against An. gambiae s.l.

Methods

Mosquitoes in late instar larvae and pupae stages were collected from different breeding habitats of the study sites using a soup ladle (350 ml capacity). The immature was reared to adults at optimum temperature and humidity in a field insectary using the WHO protocol. Four insecticides representing three chemical classes were used against adult mosquitoes. These were permethrin, deltamethrin, pirimiphos-methyl and bendiocarb. Susceptibility tests were carried out from September to December 2021 using the WHO standard procedures. Mortality rate, variation, interaction effect and knockdown times (KDT50 and KDT95%) were computed using descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis of variance and log-probit regression model using SPSS version 20 software.

Results

Totally, 1300 Anopheles gambiae s.l. were tested to determine the susceptibility status to the four insecticides. Among these, 90.7% of them were susceptible to insecticides, whereas the remaining 9.3% of specimens were resistant to the insecticides. The results of the analysis of variance showed that mortality significantly varied between insecticides (F = 26.06, DF = 3, P < .0001), but not between study locations (F = 1.56, DF = 3, P = 0.212). On the other hand, the mean comparison of dead mosquitoes showed some signs of interaction between bendiocarb and locations, but not other insecticides and locations.

Conclusions

This study revealed that the knockdown times and effectiveness of different insecticides varied in different study sites. Therefore, insecticide resistance information is very essential for concerned bodies to make informed and evidence-based decisions on vector control.

Background

Chemical insecticides are crucial for controlling vectors in the public health sectors [1]. However, due to extensive and repeated use of insecticides as well as characteristics of insect vector species, resistance was developed in medically important insects, such as major malaria vectors [2]. Resistance is defined as the ability to tolerate an insecticide dosage that would kill the majority of individuals in a typical natural population of the same species [3]. The insecticide susceptibility status of malaria vectors varies in season and it affects the effectiveness of both indoor residual spraying (IRS) and Long lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) vector control methods [4].

The emergence of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors has posed a severe threat to malaria control efforts [5]. All five of the pesticide classes that the WHO recommends are susceptible to resistance such as organochlorines, organophosphates, pyrethroids, carbamates [6] and pyrroles [7, 8] that have been used for IRS and ITNs in main African malaria vectors (An. gambiae s.l. and An. funestus) [9]. Pyrethroids in the form of ITNs and IRS were regarded to play a significant role in malaria control measures when DDT was removed as the insecticide choice in many areas [5]. However, in Ethiopia, IRS is administered using pirimiphos-methyl, propoxur, and bendiocarb, while LLINs contain deltamethrin [10]. Pyrethroid resistance hinders the effectiveness of control measures, such as ITNs and IRS in regions, where it has been detected [11].

In Ethiopia, more than forty species of Anopheles mosquitoes have been recorded and documented [12,13,14]. Of these, An. arabiensis, a member of An. gambiae complex is the principal vector of malaria followed by An. pharoensis, An. funestus and An. nili [15, 16]. Vector control is the most effective malaria control and prevention measure. There are several types of strategies being used to control malaria in endemic regions, but chemical pesticides continue to be the most important [17]. Among these, IRS, insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and LLINs are the most important in malaria prevention and control strategies in Ethiopia [18]. However, the long-term effectiveness of these strategies is under threat due to the emergency and spread of insecticide resistance in the principal malaria vector, An. arabiensis [19].

The major malaria vector has evolved resistance to all five chemical classes of insecticides authorized for IRS and LLINs in Ethiopia [20,21,22]. However, the levels of susceptibility/resistance of the Anopheles mosquitoes varied in different seasons, years and agro-ecological zones [23]. The West African knockdown resistance mutation has been reported in An. arabiensis populations at high frequencies [5, 24, 25]. Other successive studies have also recognized the occurrence of similar mutations in malaria vectors in different parts of the country [20, 25].

Knowing the susceptibility level of vectors is very important to select environmentally friendly and effective insecticides to control malaria vectors. As a result, continuous monitoring is critical for preventing the development of insecticide resistance [26]. Nevertheless, a detailed investigation of Anopheles mosquitoes and their insecticide resistance level is very few in Ethiopia in general and in Amhara Regional State around Lake Tana in particular. Hence, this study was carried out, under standardized laboratory conditions to assess the killing effect of some insecticides against major malaria vectors (An. gambiae s.l.).

Materials and methods

Study area description

This study was conducted in different locations of Lake Tana, and its surrounding areas, in northwest Ethiopia. Lake Tana is the source of the Blue Nile and is the largest lake in Ethiopia, which contributes up to 60% of the Nile’s water, and 50% of the country’s freshwater. The lake is located in Amhara Regional State at latitude of 11° 36ʹ N, and a longitude of 37° 23ʹ E.

For larvae and pupa sampling, the four study sites, which are found in the two districts (Semien Achefer, and Bahir Dar Zuria), and one city administration (Bahir Dar) were selected based on accessibility, suitability, malaria case report, and proximity of areas to the local inhabitants. The data were collected from one island (Debre Maryam), one peninsula (Zegie), and two surrounding mainland areas (Kunzila, and Robit) (Fig. 1). Larvae sampling was done in wetlands associated with Lake Tana.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the study area showing four study sites in and around Lake Tana, northwest Ethiopia

Full size image

Mosquito collection and rearing

Mosquito larvae (late instar) and pupae were collected from different breeding habitats of the study sites using a soup ladle (350 ml capacity). The immature was reared to adults in an insectary prepared in the field using the WHO protocol [27]. They were reared at optimum temperature (25 ± 2 °C) and relative humidity (70–80%), which was maintained using tarpaulin sheets and water-filled buckets, respectively, around the rearing rooms. The larvae were reared in distilled water and fed powdered yeast (Vital Brewer’s Yeast). Then, 2–5 days, non-blood-fed adult females (An. gambiae s.l.), identified using morphological key [28], were exposed to discriminating dosages of insecticides.

Insecticides used

Four insecticides representing three chemical classes were used at the following discriminating concentrations against adult mosquitoes: pyrethroids, permethrin (0.75%) and deltamethrin (0.05%), organophosphate, pirimiphos-methyl (0.25%), and carbamate, bendiocarb (0.1%) [29]. These insecticides were chosen based on their current operational importance in the Ethiopian malaria control program [30]. These insecticide-impregnated test papers were obtained from the WHO supply, and distributed through the US President's Malaria Initiative (PMI) vector-link Ethiopia project.

Insecticide susceptibility tests procedures

Susceptibility tests were carried out in the peak mosquito breeding season between September and December 2021 using WHO adult mosquito bioassay protocols [27]. In the WHO tube tests, 20–25 unfed female An. gambiae s.l. were exposed to each insecticide-impregnated paper for an hour at the ideal temperature and relative humidity, which was maintained by placing a moist towel on top of the boxes holding tubes. The numbers of knockeddown mosquitoes were recorded at 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min. After exposure periods, mosquitoes were moved into holding tubes and provided with cotton wool soaked with 10% sucrose solution. Death rates were recorded after 24 h of exposure times. The two-control replicate consisted of about 40–50 mosquitos exposed to paper impregnated with olive oil (for bendiocarb and pirimiphos-methyl) and silicone oil (for permethrin and deltamethrin).

If mortality in the control group was less than 5%, no correction of test results is necessary, whereas mortality greater than or equal to 5% requires correction [27]. Abbott's formula was used to correct mortality rates ranging from 5% to 20% [31].

Data analysis

Mortality in the ranges of 98–100%, 90–97% and less than 90% indicates susceptibility, suggestive existence of resistance and confirmation of resistance genes in the test population, respectively. The observed and corrected percentage mortality were calculated using WHO test guidelines [27]. Resistance and mortality rates were computed using descriptive statistics. The variation and interaction effects of An. gambiae s.l. death within study sites and insecticides was determined using the multivariate analysis of variance (Two Way MANOVA). The time (in a minute) required to obtain 50% and 95% knockdown in the tested mosquitoes (KDT50 and KDT95%) were determined using the log-probit regression model. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) with a level of a significant set at a p value less than 0.05.

Results

Totally, 1300 Anopheles gambiae s.l. were tested whether they were susceptible to the four insecticides (permethrin, deltamethrin, pirimiphos-methyl and bendiocarb) or not at different study sites. Among these, 90.7% of them were susceptible to insecticides, whereas the remaining 9.3% of specimens were resistant to the insecticides (Additional file 1: Table S1). In the study sites, the most susceptible An. gambiae s.l. was found in Zegie followed by Debre Maryam, Kunzila and Robit (Fig. 2). Among the four insecticides, pirimiphos-methyl (96.5%) was the most effective to kill An. gambiae s.l. followed by bendiocarb (88.7%), deltamethrin (87.2%) and permethrin (86.1%) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Percent of dead and resistant mosquitoes across the study areas

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Percent of dead and resistant mosquitoes by different insecticides

Full size image

According to the results of the multivariate analysis of variance, mortality significantly varied between insecticides (F = 26.06, DF = 3, P < 0.0001), but not between study locations (F = 1.56, DF = 3, P = 0.212). The interaction effect between the study site and insecticide showed the insignificant variation of An. gambiae s.l. mortality (F = 1.77, DF = 9, P = 0.10) (Table 1).

Table 1 Interaction effects of study sites and insecticides tested on An. gambiae s.l. across Lake Tana, northwest Ethiopia
Full size table

The calculated control mortality rate is less than 5% in all tests, therefore, no need of calculating the corrected mortality rate for the tested mosquitoes. The highest mortality rate (98.8%) due to pirimiphos-methyl insecticide was recorded in Zegie, whereas the least mortality rate (82.5%) due to deltamethrin insecticide was recorded in Robit. Similar trends of mortality rate were observed in Debre Maryam (97.5%) and Kunzila (85%) by bendiocarb insecticide. Deltamethrin and bendiocarb were indicated to kill more than 90% of Anopheles mosquitoes in Zegie, whereas pirimiphos-methyl was also indicated to kill the same percentage of Anopheles mosquitoes in the four study sites, such as Kunzila, Debre Maryam, Robit and Zegie. On the other hand, the death of less than 90% of An. gambiae s.l. were observed in the four sites (Kunzila, Zegie, Debre Maryam and Robit), the three sites (Kunzila, Debre Maryam and Robit), and the two sites (Kunzila and Robit), respectively, treated with permethrin, deltamethrin and bendiocarb (Table 2).

Table 2 Effect of different insecticides on the mortality of An. gambiae s.l. at different locations in Lake Tana area of Ethiopia
Full size table

The mean comparison of dead mosquitoes showed some signs of interaction between bendiocarb and locations. Pirimiphos-methyl had no interaction effect with the location, because it performed more or less equally across locations, i.e., 95.5–99% mortality. Bendiocarb, on the other hand, was more effective at Debre Mariam and Zegie (> 93% mortality) than at other locations (< 88% mortality), indicating some interaction with locations. The control had low mortality (< 3%) regardless of location. Insecticides in general killed more than 80% of the An. gambiae s.l. tested during the study (Table 2).

The 50% and 95% knockdown times (KDT50 and KDT95) were determined against four insecticides. In all study sites (except Debre Maryam), the fastest knockdown time (KDT50) was recorded in pirimiphos-methyl followed by bendiocarb, deltamethrin and permethrin. The fastest knockdown mosquito (KDT50 = 52.7) was recorded in Zegie by pirimiphos-methyl, whereas the slowest (KDT50 = 85.7) was recorded in Robit by permethrin. Similar trends were recorded from knockdown times (KDT95) in all study sites and insecticides used (Table 3).

Table 3 Knockdown times (minutes) (KDT50 and KDT95) of An. gambiae s.l. in different insecticides across the study areas
Full size table

Discussion

The current study showed that An. gambiae s.l. susceptibility was varied in study sites and types of insecticides used which is similar to other types of studies conducted in Ethiopia [19, 32, 33]. These variations are depending on the extensive and repeated use of insecticides in the form of IRSand LLINs for vector control [34]. The use of insecticides for other purposes such as agriculture and public health could also play a role in the increase of insecticide resistance in various places [35]. For instance, An. gambiae s.l. mosquitoes develop resistance to pyrethroids, because these classes of insecticides are applied repeatedly for the control of household pests and vectors which is implicated in the observed selection of the high levels of kdr resistance [36]. In addition, it might be explained by the differences in their mode of action and the inherited traits of the malaria vector involved in the treatments [37].

Malaria vectors develop insecticide resistance through different mechanisms. Among these, the resistance of pyrethroid is linked with the existence of the kdr allele in mosquitoes [38]. In southwestern Ethiopia, the high frequency of the kdr allele in malaria vectors was first documented and recorded [5]. Later, the same findings from Ethiopia's north, center, and southwestern regions were recorded [25, 39].

This study showed the presence of susceptibility and possible resistance in pirimiphos-methyl-treated An. gambiae s.l. Similarly, another study showed that An. arabiensis was fully susceptible to pirimiphos-methyl in some study sites [19]. Another study conducted in Ethiopia showed that a population of An. arabiensis was fully susceptible to bendiocarb and pirimiphos-methyl [32, 33, 40]. In contrast, mosquito population resistance to pirimiphos-methyl was detected in Babile (Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia) with a mortality rate of 85% [19].

Permethrin treated An. gambiae s.l. developed resistance (< 90%) in all study sites. This report is similar to some studies carried out in Ethiopia that showed high resistance of An. arabiensis to pyrethroids (permethrin and deltamethrin) [5, 19, 32, 35, 41]. Anopheles arabiensis was resistant and susceptible to permethrin in Metehara and Melka Worer, respectively [23]. A similar observation of resistance in populations of An. arabiensis to permethrin had been reported from Sudan [42]. In contrast, populations of An. gambiae s.l. proved susceptible to pyrethroids at localities in the eastern parts of the country [35, 43].

In this study, resistance and possible resistance were developed in deltamethrin and bendiocarb-treated An. gambiae s.l. at all study sites. Similarly, resistance and suspected resistance to deltamethrin were reported in different parts of Ethiopia [33]. Likewise, a low level or possible bendiocarb (carbamate) resistance was detected in different study sites of Ethiopia, such as Asendabo, Bahir Dar, Chewaka, Alamata and Lare with mortality rates of 93%, 87%, 90%, 96% and 92%, respectively [19, 33]. Permethrin and deltamethrin resistance emerged in field populations of An. arabiensis from high-risk and low-risk areas [24]. The population of An. arabiensis from all sites were resistant to deltamethrin with mean percent mortality rates of ranged between 9% and 75% [32, 37]. On the other hand, An. arabiensis showed fully susceptible to bendiocarb [35, 37, 44]. Surprisingly, malaria vectors isolated from a region of Metema in northwest Ethiopia showed nearly complete susceptibility to deltamethrin, with an average death of 99% [19].

Depending on the type of insecticide and the location of capture, An. gambiae s.l. was knocked-down at different rates. This variation is due to the susceptibility status of Anopheles mosquitoes and the nature of insecticides used [44]. Knockdown time is affected by the concentration of insecticides, the exposure interval, and the residual time of post-application [45].

The fastest knockdown mosquito was recorded in Zegie by pirimiphos-methyl, whereas the slowest was recorded in Robit by permethrin. This is similar to studies conducted in different parts of Ethiopia and DR Congo showing different KDT50 and KDT95 in different study sites and insecticides used [32, 44]. The result of this study revealed that permethrin had the slowest knockdown times. This result is similar to some studies carried out in Ethiopia that showed KDT50 of permethrin was greater than 60 min for all An. gambiae s.l. samples from the three study sites [24, 35]. On the other hand, the KDT50 of permethrin was much less than 60 min in Ethiopia and Sudan [23, 46], which is much faster than the present study.

The KDT50 value for deltamethrin was less than 60 min for both low-risk and high-risk groups [24, 44], which is a little bit faster than the current study. However, the KDT95 of all three samples tested for deltamethrin was greater than 60 min [35], which is more or less similar to our study. Likewise, 95% of Anopheles were knocked after 53 min of deltamethrin treatment [44]. In addition to this, all populations from the desert and semi-desert sites showed a faster KDT50 and KDT95 to bendiocarb than to DDT and malathion [46], which is more or less similar to the current study. In bendiocarb, the KDT50 was below 60 min, whereas KDT95 was above 60 min [47]. The current study showed that pirimiphos-methyl had lower KDT50 and KDT95 than other insecticides. This report is more or less similar to the study conducted in Tanzania [48]. However, another study conducted in Ghana showed that pirimiphos-methyl had the highest knockdown times when compared to other groups of insecticides [49].

The emergence of insecticide resistance in populations of An. gambiae s.l. could threaten the current vector control operations in Ethiopia [50]. Pyrethroids were regarded to play a significant role in malaria control measures [5]. In areas where pyrethroid resistance has been detected, it affects the efficacy of control treatments, such as ITNs and IRS [11]. As a result, the observed resistance to pyrethroids and suspected resistance to bendiocarb in mosquito populations in the study area calls for ongoing resistance monitoring to delay or slow down insecticide resistance. Combining two insecticides with different modes of action has been suggested as a resistance management method that tries to kill resistant vectors [51]. In addition to this, deploying different insecticides in different regions, using insecticides in rotation manner and integrated vector management have been suggested as a resistance management method.

Conclusions

The current study revealed that the knockdown times and effectiveness of different insecticides varied in different study sites. In Zegie, the pirimiphos-methyl was the most effective in knockdown and killing An. gambiae s.l when compared to the other insecticides and study sites. The average mortality rate of this study confirmed the presence of resistance in permethrin (87.2%) and deltamethrin (87.23%) and suspected resistance in bendiocarb (91%) and pirimiphos-methyl (97.1%). Therefore, insecticide resistance information is very essential for concerned bodies to make informed and evidence-based decisions on vector control. This study did not show the mechanisms of resistance due to a shortage of materials and chemicals as well as proper laboratory access both in our country and abroad. Hence, further studies should be conducted in these study areas to know the mechanisms of resistance specifically and the resistance levels of malaria vectors in different parts of Ethiopia broadly.

Availability of data and materials

The entire row data are available on the request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Raghavendra K, Barik TK, Reddy BN, Sharma P, Dash AP. Malaria vector control: from past to future. Parasitol Res. 2011;108:757–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Soko W, Chimbari MJ, Mukaratirwa S. Insecticide resistance in malaria-transmitting mosquitoes in Zimbabwe: a review. Infect Dis Poverty. 2015;4:46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Callaghan A. Insecticide resistance: mechanisms and detection methods. Sci Prog. (1933-). 1991:423-37.

  4. Ranson H, Jensen B, Vulule J, Wang X, Hemingway J, Collins F. Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol Biol. 2000;9:491–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yewhalaw D, Van Bortel W, Denis L, Coosemans M, Duchateau L, Speybroeck N. First evidence of high knockdown resistance frequency in Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) from Ethiopia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83:122–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WHO. World Malaria Report 2017. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2017.

  7. WHO. Recommended insecticides for indoor residual spraying against malaria vectors. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

  8. WHO. World malaria report 2021. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2021.

  9. Coetzee M, Hunt RH, Wilkerson R, Della Torre A, Coulibaly MB, Besansky NJ. Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles amharicus, new members of the Anopheles gambiae complex. Zootaxa. 2013;3619:246–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alemayehu E, Asale A, Eba K, Getahun K, Tushune K, Bryon A, et al. Mapping insecticide resistance and characterization of resistance mechanisms in Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. N’Guessan R, Corbel V, Akogbéto M, Rowland M. Reduced efficacy of insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying for malaria control in pyrethroid resistance area, Benin. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. FMoH. Five-year National Operational Plan for Malaria Prevention and Control in Ethiopia 2016–2020. Addis Ababa, 2016.

  13. Kyalo D, Amratia P, Mundia CW, Mbogo CM, Coetzee M, Snow RW. A geo-coded inventory of anophelines in the Afrotropical Region south of the Sahara: 1898-2016 [Version 1; referees: 3 approved]. Wellcome Open Res. 2017;2:57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Irish SR, Kyalo D, Snow RW, Coetzee M. Updated list of Anopheles species (Diptera: Culicidae) by country in the Afrotropical Region and associated islands. Zootaxa. 2020;4747:zootaxa. 4747.3.

  15. Kibret S, Yihenew A, Boelee E, Habte T, Dawit A, Beyene P. The impact of a small-scale irrigation scheme on malaria transmission in Ziway area, Central Ethiopia. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15:41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jaleta K, Sharon HR, Seyoum E, Balkew M, Gebre-Michael T, Ignell R, et al. Agro-ecosystems impact malaria prevalence: large-scale irrigation drives vector population in western Ethiopia. Malar J. 2013;12:350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhatt S, Weiss D, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526:207–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Biscoe ML, Mutero CM, Kramer RA. Current policy and status of DDT use for malaria control in Ethiopia, Uganda, Kenya and South Africa: Working paper 95. IWMI; 2004.

  19. Messenger LA, Shililu J, Irish SR, Anshebo GY, Tesfaye AG, Ye-Ebiyo Y, et al. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles arabiensis from Ethiopia (2012–2016): a nationwide study for insecticide resistance monitoring. Malar J. 2017;16:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Asale A, Getachew Y, Hailesilassie W, Speybroeck N, Duchateau L, Yewhalaw D. Evaluation of the efficacy of DDT indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticidal nets against insecticide resistant populations of Anopheles arabiensis Patton (Diptera: Culicidae) from Ethiopia using experimental huts. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yewhalaw D, Asale A, Tushune K, Getachew Y, Duchateau L, Speybroeck N. Bio-efficacy of selected long-lasting insecticidal nets against pyrethroid resistant Anopheles arabiensis from South-Western Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Massebo F, Lindtjørn B. The effect of screening doors and windows on indoor density of Anopheles arabiensis in south-west Ethiopia: a randomized trial. Malar J. 2013;12:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Balkew M, Gebre-Michael T, Hailu A. Insecticide susceptibility level of Anopheles arabiensis in two agrodevelopment localities in eastern Ethiopia. Parassitologia. 2003;45:1–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yewhalaw D, Wassie F, Steurbaut W, Spanoghe P, Van Bortel W, Denis L, et al. Multiple insecticide resistance: an impediment to insecticide-based malaria vector control program. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e16066.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fettene M, Olana D, Christian R, Koekemoer L, Coetzee M. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles arabiensis from Ethiopia. Afr Entomol. 2013;21:89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ranson H, N’guessan R, Lines J, Moiroux N, Nkuni Z, Corbel V. Pyrethroid resistance in African anopheline mosquitoes: what are the implications for malaria control? Trends Parasitol. 2011;27:91–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. WHO. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes. 2016; 9241511575.

  28. Coetzee M. Key to the females of Afrotropical Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Malar J. 2020;19:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lemine AMM, Lemrabott MAO, Basco LK, Bogreau H, Faye O, Boukhary AOMS. Pyrethroid resistance in the major malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis in Nouakchott, Mauritania. Parasites Vectors. 2018;11:344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chanyalew T, Natea G, Amenu D, Yewhalaw D, Simma EA. Composition of mosquito fauna and insecticide resistance status of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato in Itang special district, Gambella, Southwestern Ethiopia. Malar J. 2022;21:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Abbott WS. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol. 1925;18:265–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Balkew M, Ibrahim M, Koekemoer LL, Brooke BD, Engers H, Aseffa A, et al. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) from villages in central, northern and south west Ethiopia and detection of kdr mutation. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. PMI. President’s malaria initiative Ethiopia, Malaria Operational Plan FY 2019, 2019.

  34. WHO. World Health Organisation 2012. Global plan for insecticide resistance management in malaria vectors, 2012.

  35. Boussougou-Sambe ST, Eyisap WE, Tasse GCT, Mandeng SE, Mbakop LR, Enyong P, et al. Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles gambiae (sl) in South-West Cameroon four years after long-lasting insecticidal net mass distribution. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Weill M, Lutfalla G, Mogensen K, Chandre F, Berthomieu A, Berticat C, et al. Insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors. Nature. 2003;423:136–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Abate A, Getu E, Wale M, Hadis M, Mekonen W. Impact of bendiocarb 80% WP indoor residual spraying on insecticide resistance status of Anopheles arabiensis. Ethiop J Sci Technol. 2020;13:215–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bloomquist JR. Ion channels as targets for insecticides. Annu Rev Entomol. 1996;41:163–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Balkew M, Ibrahim M, Koekemoer LL, Brooke BD, Engers H, Aseffa A, et al. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) from villages in central, northern and south west Ethiopia and detection of kdr mutation. Parasites Vectors. 2010;3:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. FDRE. Ethiopian malaria elimination plan: 2021–2025, 2020.

  41. Niang EHA, Konaté L, Diallo M, Faye O, Dia I. Patterns of insecticide resistance and knock down resistance (kdr) in malaria vectors An. arabiensis, An. coluzzii and An. gambiae from sympatric areas in Senegal. Parasites Vectors. 2016;9:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Abdalla H, Matambo T, Koekemoer L, Mnzava A, Hunt R, Coetzee M. Insecticide susceptibility and vector status of natural populations of Anopheles arabiensis from Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:263–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Himeidan YES, Dukeen M, El Rayah EA, Adam I. Anopheles arabiensis: abundance and insecticide resistance in an irrigated area of eastern Sudan. EMHJ-Eastern Mediterr Health J. 2004;10(1–2):167–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Matubi EM, Kaounga GI, Zanga J, Mbuku GB, Maniania JNK, Mulenda B, et al. Insecticide susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae sl and identification of some resistance mechanisms in Kwilu Province in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;37(79).

  45. Athanassiou CG, Kavallieratos NG, Arthur FH, Nakas CT. Rating knockdown of flour beetles after exposure to two insecticides as an indicator of mortality. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Korti M, Ageep T, Adam A, Shitta K, Hassan A, Algadam A, et al. Status of insecticide susceptibility in Anopheles arabiensis and detection of the knockdown resistance mutation (kdr) concerning agricultural practices from Northern Sudan state, Sudan. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2021;19:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nnko EJ, Kihamia C, Tenu F, Premji Z, Kweka EJ. Insecticide use pattern and phenotypic susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato to commonly used insecticides in Lower Moshi, northern Tanzania. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mbepera S, Nkwengulila G, Peter R, Mausa EA, Mahande AM, Coetzee M, et al. The influence of age on insecticide susceptibility of Anopheles arabiensis during dry and rainy seasons in rice irrigation schemes of Northern Tanzania. Malar J. 2017;16:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Akuamoah-Boateng Y, Brenyah R, Kwarteng S, Obuam P, Owusu-Frimpong I, Agyapong A, et al. Malaria transmission, vector diversity, and insecticide resistance at a peri-urban site in the forest zone of Ghana. Front Trop Dis. 2021;2: 739771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. FMoH. National malaria elimination roadmap. National malaria prevention control and elimination. Disease prevention and control directorate. Ethiopia Addis Ababa. 2016.

  51. WHO. Global plan for insecticide resistance management. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank you all individuals who helped us with the data collection and the Presidential Malaria Initiative (PMI) vector-link Ethiopia project for their material support. Our special thanks also go to Yelfugash Asmare (PhD) for helping us with the materials supply.

Funding

Biotechnology Research Institute (BRI) of Bahir Dar University funds this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Bahir Dar University, P.O. Box 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

    Fasil A. Kendie & Melaku Wale

  2. Biotechnology Research Institute, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

    Endalkachew Nibret

  3. Amhara Public Health Institute, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

    Zena Ameha

Authors
  1. Fasil A. Kendie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Melaku Wale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Endalkachew Nibret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zena Ameha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fasil A. Kendie.

Ethics declarations

Ethics for approval and consent to participate

Before data collection, an ethics clearance letter was received from the Ethics Clearance Committee of the College of Science, Bahir Dar University. A permission letter or supportive letter was obtained from Amhara Public Health Institute.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Number of dead and resistant mosquitoes across the study areas by different insecticides.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kendie, F.A., Wale, M., Nibret, E. et al. Insecticide susceptibility status of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) in and surrounding areas of Lake Tana, northwest Ethiopia. Trop Med Health 51, 3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-023-00497-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-023-00497-w

Keywords

Tropical Medicine and Health

ISSN: 1349-4147

Contact us