Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Community’s misconception about COVID-19 and its associated factors among Gondar town residents, Northwest Ethiopia

Tropical Medicine and Health volume 48, Article number: 99 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Despite the implementation of various strategies such as the declaration of COVID-19 emergency state, staying at home, lockdown, and massive protective equipment distribution, still COVID-19 is increasing alarmingly. Therefore, the study aimed to assess the community’s perception of COVID-19 and its associated factors in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

A community-based cross-sectional study was employed among 635 Gondar administrative town residents, from April 20 to April 27, 2020. Study participants were selected using a cluster sampling technique. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire. Epi-Data version 4.6 and STATA 14 were used for data entry and analysis, respectively. Logistic regressions (bivariable and multivariable) were performed to identify statistically significant variables at p < 0.05.

Results

Of the 635 study participants, 623 have completed the study with a 98.1% response rate. The mean age of participants was 36.32 years (SD ± 13.24). The overall magnitude of the community’s misconception about COVID-19 stood at 56.9% (349). Age and religion showed a negative association with misconceptions. To be specific, being in the age group of 27–33 (AOR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.32, 0.86) and being a Muslim (AOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34, 0.78) were negatively associated with the misconception of COVID-19, whereas occupation and awareness showed positive associations with the misconception. To be specific, having an unemployed occupational status (AOR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.14, 2.82) and being unaware of the number of cases of COVID-19 (AOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.05, 2.62) were positively associated with the community’s misconception on COVID-19.

Conclusion

The magnitude of the community’s misconception about COVID-19 among Gondar town residents was high. Age, religion, unemployment, and unawareness about the number of COVID-19 cases were significant factors of misconception about COVID-19. Thus, stakeholders ought to build community perceptions about COVID 19. To resolve misinformation about COVID-19, accurate and relevant information should be provided to the community using appropriate communication media.

Background

Coronavirus diseases 19 (COVID-19) is defined as an illness caused by a novel coronavirus now called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2; formerly called 2019 novel coronavirus or 2019-nCov) [1, 2]. The virus was first identified on December 30, 2019, in Wuhan city, Hubei province, China. It is highly contagious, causing flu-like symptoms, and spreads worldwide which became a global pandemic [3].

The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 varies from being asymptomatic to severe clinical conditions like respiratory failure [4]. The virus can enter the body from the reservoirs mainly through respiratory droplets during coughing, sneezing, and touching. Wearing a face mask, keeping social distance more than 3 ft, and staying at home are the strategies implemented to break this outbreak [3]. Nevertheless, weak health system, equipment shortage, lack of robust containment measures, problem in managing mobility, economic vulnerability, limited fiscal spacing [5], and the unknown biologic nature of the disease [6] are the main challenges in COVID-19 pandemic prevention.

The virus can survive in different environment, temperature, and humidity conditions [7]. Even though COVID-19 affects all people, its risk is high among people with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, cardiovascular diseases, cerebrovascular disease, and other co-morbidities [8]. As studies showed, of the total coronavirus cases, about 80% displayed mild symptoms, and 14% developed severe complications like pneumonia. Only 5% have been critical, and 1% were asymptomatic [9, 10].

COVID-19 can result in complications such as thrombocytopenia [11], sepsis-induced coagulopathy [12], acute encephalopathy [13], systemic inflammation, multiorgan dysfunction, acute myocardial infarction, lung and heart failure, and dysrhythmias [14]. Thus, COVID-19 has become the cause of a massive global health crisis [15] that affects the social, mental, and psychological well-being of the world’s population [16].

There is a lot of information out there about coronavirus, but not all are true [17]. Most people believed that COVID-19 is a stigmatized disease despite the efforts of COVID risk communication and public education [18].

Misconception can be present in different levels of a community. Some people believed that wearing a surgical mask is most effective, and eating from a Chinese restaurant is highly risky to acquire the virus [19]. A study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, recorded a misconception rate of 66.9% [16]. In Nigeria, 83% of participants of a study held at least one misconception related to COVID-19 at which they believed that the virus originated in the laboratory. Accordingly, misconceptions have consequences on the short- and long-term control efforts against the disease, and it is one of the health hazards in the prevention of coronavirus [20].

Policy and health education modifications are essential for minimizing the adverse health effects of COVID-19 [21]. Community engagement is also of paramount importance in joint prevention and control of confronting uncertainty and countering rumors effectively [22]. Focusing on measures such as campaigns to raise awareness, disprove myths, and induce compliance is vital in preventing the spread of COVID-19 [10]. Even though there is an implementation of different strategies such as declaring COVID-19 emergency state, staying at home, lockdown, and massive protective equipment distribution, the COVID-19 cases are increasing alarmingly from time to time [7]. Therefore, the study aimed to assess the community perception toward COVID-19 and identify the factors associated with it.

Method and materials

Study design and period

A community-based cross-sectional study design was employed from April 20 to 27, 2020.

Study area

The study was conducted at the selected kebeles of Gondar town. The town of Gondar is located at 750-km distance, northwest of Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia. According to the 2015 population projection of major cities in Ethiopia, the total population of Gondar town was estimated to be 323,900. The town has 22 kebeles. Currently, it has one referral hospital and eight government health centers.

Population

All people above 18 years of age in Gondar town and those in the selected kebeles were taken as source and study population, respectively.

Sample size and sampling technique

The sample size is determined using a single population proportion formula by considering the following statistical assumptions:

Confidence level (Cl) of 95%

Proportion = 50%

Margin of error of 5%

Using the following single proportion formula:

n = \( \frac{\left( Za/2\right)2\times P\left(1-P\right)}{(W)2} \)where:

n = initial sample size

Z = 1.96, the corresponding Z-score for the 95% CI

P = proportion = 50%

W = margin of error = 5% = 0.05

n = \( \frac{\left(\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{96}\right)\mathbf{2}\times \mathbf{0.5}\left(\mathbf{1}-\mathbf{0.5}\right)}{\left(\mathbf{0.05}\right)\mathbf{2}} \) = 384

By considering a 10% non-response rate, and a design effect of 1.5, the final sample size was 635. Finally, participants’ households were accessed using a cluster sampling technique.

From a total of 22 kebeles, eight kebeles (kebele 7, kebele 8, kebele 9, kebele 13, kebele 16, kebele 17, kebele 18, kebele 20) were selected by using a lottery method. Then, from each kebele, one to two Ketenas (the lowest administrative cluster) were selected, depending on the number of households. Those selected Ketenas were considered clusters, and all households in the selected Ketenas were involved, and one of the parents in each household was interviewed. A family member aged 18 years and above was the respondent whenever the parents were not available at the time of data collection.

Data collection tools and procedures

Data regarding the socio-demographic, information exposure, risk perception, and precaution measure adoption and misconception were collected through face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire adapted from different literature. Respondents were asked the sources of information about COVID-19 and how much they trusted those sources. Respondents were also asked about the types of information that they wanted to receive. Participants were asked whether they were taking precautionary measures like avoiding handshaking, adopting hand washing, and practicing physical distancing.

The data were collected by 24 BSc nurses, and the overall data collection process was strictly followed by 6 supervisors. A 1-day training was given to the data collectors and supervisors about the purpose of the study, data collection tools, collection techniques, and ethical issues during the selection of participants and collection of the data. All answers to close- and open-ended questions were written down manually by the interviewers. Daily, the supervisors assessed the consistency and completeness of the data.

Operational definitions

Misconception

In this study, 11 questions were developed to assess the community’s misconception of COVID-19. Each of the questions had five possible response categories ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5), which gives a possible total individual score of 55. First, negatively and positively constructed questions were recoded to the response categories. Then, individual and overall scores were computed. Since the data did not have a normal distribution, the median score was used to determine who had misconceptions and who did not have a misconception.

Finally, participants who had a median and above score of the COVID-19 misconception assessment questions were coded as having misconceptions otherwise no misconceptions.

Information exposure

Respondents were asked whether they have heard about various aspects of COVID-19, and the responses were coded “yes” or “no.”

Knowledge level

After data cleaning, the knowledge questions were recoded to the respective values, and the overall result was computed. Since the knowledge data did not have a normal distribution, the median score was used to determine the knowledge level. Accordingly, participants who had a median and above score of the knowledge questions about COVID-19 were labeled as having good knowledge otherwise poor knowledge.

Attitude

The attitude questions were recoded to the respective values, and the overall result was computed. Since the attitude data did not have a normal distribution, the median score was used to determine the attitude level. Accordingly, participants who had a median and above score of the attitude questions about the COVID-19 and its preventive measures were labeled as having a favorable attitude otherwise unfavorable attitude.

Study variables

Dependent variable

  • ✓Community’s misconception about COVID-19

Independent variables

  • ✓Socio-demographic variables

  • ✓Information exposure level

  • ✓Knowledge about COVID-19

  • ✓Attitude toward COVID-19 and its preventive measures

  • ✓Self-perceived health status

  • ✓Perceived dangerousness of COVID-19

  • ✓Worry about COVID-19

Statistical analysis

The data entry was performed using the statistical program Epi-Data version 4.6 and then exported into STATA 14 for analysis. Descriptive statistics were carried out and presented with narration, tabulation, and graphical presentation. Binary logistic regression (bivariable and multivariable) was performed so as to identify statistically significant variables. Variables with a p value < 0.2 in the bivariable analysis were candidate variables for multivariable logistic regression. To declare statistically significant variables, the adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval and a p value < 0.05 were used in the multivariable analysis. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test was performed, and the decision was made at a p value > 0.05.

Quality assurance mechanisms

To assure the quality of the data, the tool was prepared first in English and then translated into Amharic (the local language in the study area) by language experts. Data collectors and supervisors were trained on the data collection process for 1 day. The data collection tool was pretested on 5% of the total sample size in sub-cities which had not been selected for actual data collection. Modifications were made to the questionnaire accordingly. Data collectors were closely monitored by investigators and supervisors. Moreover, the data quality was assured by using statistical parameters for assessing the validity of the collected data.

Result

Socio-demographic and personal characteristics of respondents

Out of the 635 selected study participants, 623 agreed to participate in the study, making up a response rate of 98.1%. Among the participants, 174 (27.9%) were in the age group of 34–45 years, with the mean age of 36.32 years (± 13.24 standard deviation). Four hundred two (64.5%) were female, and 373 (59.9%) of the participants were married. Four hundred thirty-three (69.5%) were Orthodox Christians. Two hundred two (32.4%) had at least a college education, and 448 (72%) were unemployed. More than half (55.2%) of the participants had a household of 4–6 occupants. The majority (90.5%) of the participants had good perceived health status, and 91.5% perceived COVID-19 as dangerous. Two thirds (71.3%) were worried about the COVID-19 (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic and personal characteristics of the study participants among Gondar town residents, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 623)
Full size table

Knowledge, attitude, and information exposure of respondents about COVID-19

In this study, half (50.7%) of the participants had good knowledge about COVID-19. About 57.5% and 52% of participants had favorable attitudes toward COVID-19 and its preventive measures, respectively. The majority, 97.1%, 84.7%, 84.6%, and 81.7% of participants had heard about prevention, symptoms, transmission, and complications of COVID-19, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2 Knowledge, attitude, and information exposure of study participants about COVID-19 among Gondar town residents, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 623)
Full size table

Community’s misconceptions about COVID-19

In this study, the overall magnitude of the community’s misconception about COVID-19 was found to be 56.9% (95% CI 52–59). Of all participants, 44.3% and 36.3% responded “agree” for questions on COVID-19 mainly affects older people and it is easy to become infected with COVID-19 on an airplane, respectively. About 30.5% and 41.7% of the participants responded “disagree” for questions it is safe to receive packages from foreigners and wearing a face mask is enough to protect oneself from catching COVID-19, respectively. Regarding the question whether a hot cup of coffee or tea kills the coronavirus, 39.5% of the participants responded “agree” (Table 3).

Table 3 Magnitude of COVID-19 misconceptions among Gondar town residents, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 623)
Full size table

Factors associated with the community’s misconceptions of COVID-19

In the bivariable logistic regression analysis, age, religion, educational status, occupation, information about COVID-19 symptoms, information about COVID-19 distribution, and information about the number of COVID-19 were significantly associated factors.

However, in the multivariable logistic regression, age, religion, occupation, and information about the number of COVID-19-infected people remained significantly associated with the community’s misconception of COVID-19.

Participants in the age group of 27–33 years were 52% (AOR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.32, 0.86) less likely to have a misconception of COVID-19 compared to their younger age group (18–26 years of age). The misconception of COVID-19 was 51% (AOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34, 0.78) less likely among Muslim participants compared to Orthodox Christian participants.

Unemployed participants were 1.79 (AOR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.14, 2.82) times more likely to have a misconception about the COVID-19 compared with the employed participants. Participants who never heard about the number of COVID-19-infected people were 1.66 (AOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.05, 2.62) times more likely to have misconceptions of COVID-19 compared to those participants who had heard about the numbers of COVID-19-infected people (Table 4).

Table 4 Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of factors for misconceptions of COVID-19 among Gondar town residents, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 623)
Full size table

Discussion

Nowadays, COVID-19 is a global concern for discussion among the media as well as the public. Its mode of transmission has also induced tension among people around the world. But in low-income countries like Ethiopia, awareness of the community about COVID-19 varies in different settings. For this reason, we investigated the community’s misconception about COVID-19 and its associated factors among Gondar town residents.

The magnitude of community misperception about COVID-19 among the Gondar community was found to be 56.9% (95% CI 52, 59). About 42.5% of the study participants have an unfavorable attitude toward COVID 19. However, 97.1% and 84.7% had heard about prevention and transmission methods of COVID-19, respectively, whereas about 53% of the study participants did not hear about the number of infected persons in the Gondar community.

The finding of the current study about the magnitude of misconception about COVID-19 is lower than that of the Saudi population study [16]. The discrepancy could be due to the method of data collection, socio-demographic characteristics of the participants, and measurement tools. The researchers of the current study have designed an interview-based questionnaire so that the community might correctly answer. In case of accessing data online, the outcome might be inflated. Besides, the time difference between the two studies might also be one possible reason. The current study was conducted after the disease distribution increased globally, and awareness of the population increased relatively. This may reduce the misconception toward COVID-19.

Participants in the age group of 27–33 years were 52% less likely to have misconceptions of COVID-19 compared to those in the age group of 18–26 years. Older adults were more sensitive to get accurate knowledge about COVID-19, and they had difficulty in implementing the prevention mechanisms (hand washing, physical distancing, and wearing masks) of COVID-19, for they had fear regarding the nature of the pandemic. Alongside the severity of the COVID-19, the illness became worse in older ages which made the older adults dig out more information to realize the COVID-19 pandemic prevention [23]. Older adults have more information acquisition compared to lower age groups [24]. Furthermore, the population in this age group may feel responsible to protect themselves and others from the pandemic than the younger age group [25]. For this reason, they may search for accurate information that reduces the misconception toward the disease.

Occupation is one of the factors associated with the misconception toward COVID-19. Unemployed participants were 1.79 more likely to have a misconception about COVID-19 compared to participants with employed occupational status. This result has been supported by a study done in Saudi [16]. People who were unemployed mostly have lower education status compared with employed ones. These could burden the unemployed people by the inflow of information from different sources like Facebook and other sources, and they would be confused and worried about the finding of accurate knowledge [26, 27].

The misconception about COVID-19 was 51% less likely among Muslim participants compared to Orthodox Christian participants. In this case, Muslim followers can practice their religion independently. An individual Muslim can perform his/her religious practice in his/her house, which helps to reduce physical contact. On the other hand, in Orthodox Christianity, most of the services are provided by the priests, i.e., to get spiritual services, everyone should go to the church, which could contribute to physical contact. Besides, Christian followers believe that the COVID-19 is a result of punishment from God or is the work of the devil. So, they believe that this pandemic disease would be eliminated by the help of God. As a result, they may trust more information from religious leaders, and they may ignore information from health authorities which may lead to the misconception about the pandemic [28]. Therefore, most of the people ignored some principles like physical distancing and others.

Participants who had not heard of the number of COVID-19-infected people were 1.66 times more likely to have misconceptions about COVID-19 compared to their counterparts. Most of the time, people may underestimate health-promoting behaviors like hand washing and overestimate harmful behaviors. So, providing accurate information about what most people are doing is very important in health promotion. When people heard about the number of COVID-19 infection, it may give emphasis and empower themselves to know about the preventive measures, symptoms, and mode of transmission of the pandemic virus.

Therefore, people who had a positive knowledge about COVID-19 could be instrumental in reducing the disease because they can spread positive interventions like hand washing and physical distancing by demonstrating them to a wide range of people [29].

Limitations

This study does not show a temporal relationship. The study may have a social desirability bias. In addition, the study was limited to the town and its surrounding, which may not be representative of the rural area which has problems related to access to information.

Conclusion

The magnitude of the community’s misconception about COVID-19 among Gondar town residents was high. Age, religion, unemployment, and unawareness about the number of COVID-19-infected people were significant factors of misconception about COVID-19 among the residents. Besides, COVID-19 has an impact on social, economic, and political issues. Thus, stakeholders need to promote positive community perceptions about COVID-19. To resolve misinformation about COVID-19, accurate and relevant information should be provided to the community using appropriate communication media.

Availability of data and materials

The summary data are available in the main document, and the dataset analyzed is available from the corresponding author on reasonable requests.

Abbreviations

AOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

COR:

Crude odds ratio

OR:

Odds ratio

SD:

Standard deviation

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Lipsitch M, Swerdlow DL, Finelli L. Defining the epidemiology of Covid-19—studies needed. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;382(13):1194–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Organization, W.H Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): situation report, 88. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kapil Amgain D, Neupane S, Panthy L. Myths vs. Truths regarding the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COIV-2019) Outbreak. J Karnali Academy Health Sci. 2020;3:1–6.

  4. Sarla GS. COVID 19: myths and facts. Res Rev. 2020;2(2):5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Medinilla A, Byiers B, Apiko P. African regional responses to COVID-19. 2020.

  6. Cao X. COVID-19: immunopathology and its implications for therapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(5):269–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Emami A, Javanmardi F, Pirbonyeh N, Keshavarzi A. Specification and Misconception About COVID-19 Disappearing. 2020;5.

  8. Wang B, et al. Does comorbidity increase the risk of patients with COVID-19: evidence from meta-analysis. Aging (Albany). 2020;12(7):6049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sabah D. Facts vs myths: 10 common misconceptions about COVID-19 and corona virus debunked; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khadka S, Hashmi FK, Usman M. Preventing COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries. Drugs Ther Perspect. 2020;36:250–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-020-00728-8.

  11. Lippi G, Plebani M, Henry BM. Thrombocytopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: a meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;506:145–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.03.022.

  12. Connors JM, Levy JH. COVID-19 and its implications for thrombosis and anticoagulation. Blood J Am Soc Hematol. 2020;135(23):2033–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Filatov A, Sharma P, Hindi F, et al. Neurological Complications of Coronavirus Disease(COVID-19): Encephalopathy. Cureus. 2020;12(3):e7352. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7352.

  14. Long B, et al. Cardiovascular complications in COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(7):1504–7.

  15. Bavel JJV, Baicker K, Boggio PS. et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4:460–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884.

  16. Baig, M., et al., Predictors of misconceptions, knowledge, attitudes, and practices of COVID-19 pandemic among a sample of Saudi population and its impact: a cross-sectional study. medRxiv, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.22.20110627.

  17. Roy S. Low-income countries are more immune to COVID-19: a misconception. Indian J Med Sci. 2020;72(1):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kebede Y, et al. Knowledge, perceptions and preventive practices towards COVID-19 early in the outbreak among Jimma University Medical Center visitors, Southwest Ethiopia. Plos one. 2020;15(5):e0233744.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Geldsetzer P. Use of rapid online surveys to assess people’s perceptions during infectious disease outbreaks: a cross-sectional survey on COVID-19. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(4):e18790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Isah, M.B., et al., Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): knowledge, attitudes, practices (KAP) and misconceptions in the general population of Katsina State, Nigeria. medRxiv, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.11.20127936.

  21. Yang XY, Yang T, Rockett IR. Changing trends of excess self-protective behavior, and association with belief in prevention myths during the COVID-19 epidemic in China: a panel study. medRxiv, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.18.20102434.

  22. Hu G, Qiu W. From guidance to practice: Promoting risk communication and community engagement for prevention and control of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) outbreak in China. J Evid Based Med. 2020;13:168–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12387.

  23. Garg S, Kim L, Whitaker M, et al. Hospitalization Rates and Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized with Laboratory-Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 — COVID-NET, 14 States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:458–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e3.

  24. Hybertson D, Perdue J, Hybertson D. Age differences in information acquisition strategies. Exp Aging Res. 1982;8(2):109–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Salusky I, Larson RW, Griffith A, Wu J, Raffaelli M, Sugimura N, et al. How adolescents develop responsibility: what can be learned from youth programs. J Res Adolesc. 2014;24(3):417–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Depoux A, Martin S, Karafillakis E, Preet R, Wilder-Smith A, Larson H. The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak. J Travel Med. 2020;27(3):taaa031. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa031.

  27. Mohamad E, Azlan AA. COVID-19 and communication planning for health emergencies. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication. 2020;36(1):2289–1528.

  28. Tamene G. Features of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church and the clergy. Asian and Afr Stud. 1998;7(1):87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kim DA, Hwong AR, Stafford D, Hughes DA, O’Malley AJ, Fowler JH, et al. Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9989):145–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the University of Gondar for the fund and the approval of the ethical clearance. The authors would like to thank the respective sub-city administration offices of the Gondar town for their permission letter, data collectors and supervisors for their commitment, and the study participants for their valuable information.

Funding

This study was funded by the University of Gondar. However, the funder had no role in the data collection, preparation of the manuscript, and decision to publish.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Habtamu Sewunet Mekonnen & Abere Woretaw Azagew

  2. Department of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Chalachew Adugna Wubneh, Getaneh Mulualem Belay & Nega Tezera Assimamaw

  3. School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences and Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Chilot Desta Agegnehu

  4. Department of Health Education and Behavioral Sciences, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Telake Azale

  5. Department of Women’s and Family Health, School of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Zelalem Nigussie Azene

  6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Mehari Woldemariam Merid, Atalay Goshu Muluneh, Getahun Molla Kassa, Melaku Kindie Yenit, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye & Asefa Adimasu Taddese

  7. Department of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Demiss Mulatu Geberu

  8. Departmnet of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Sewbesew Yitayih Tilahun

  9. Department of General Midwifery, School of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Animut Tagele Tamiru & Bayew Kelkay Rade

  10. Department of Clinical Midwifery, School of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Eden Bishaw Taye

  11. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Zewudu Andualem, Henok Dagne, Gebisa Guyasa Kabito, Tesfaye Hambisa Mekonnen, Sintayehu Daba Wami, Jember Azanaw, Tsegaye Adane & Mekuriaw Alemayehu

  12. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gondar, Ethiopia

    Kiros Terefe Gashaye

Authors
  1. Habtamu Sewunet Mekonnen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abere Woretaw Azagew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chalachew Adugna Wubneh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Getaneh Mulualem Belay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nega Tezera Assimamaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chilot Desta Agegnehu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Telake Azale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zelalem Nigussie Azene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mehari Woldemariam Merid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Atalay Goshu Muluneh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Demiss Mulatu Geberu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Getahun Molla Kassa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Melaku Kindie Yenit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Sewbesew Yitayih Tilahun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Kassahun Alemu Gelaye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Animut Tagele Tamiru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Bayew Kelkay Rade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Eden Bishaw Taye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Asefa Adimasu Taddese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Zewudu Andualem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Henok Dagne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Kiros Terefe Gashaye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Gebisa Guyasa Kabito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Tesfaye Hambisa Mekonnen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Sintayehu Daba Wami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Jember Azanaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Tsegaye Adane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Mekuriaw Alemayehu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HSM, AWA, CAW, GMB, NTA, CDA, and TA designed the study, developed the proposal, participated in the data collection, performed the analysis, and drafted the manuscript.

HSM, AWA, CAW, GMB, NTA, CDA, TA, ZNA, MWM, AGM, GMK, DMG, MKY, SYT, KAG, ATT, BKR, EBT, AAT, ZA, HD, KTG, GGK, THM, SD, JA, TA, and MA approved the proposal with revisions, participated in the data analysis, and revised the subsequent drafts of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Habtamu Sewunet Mekonnen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Gondar, and an official permission letter was gained from the town administrative office. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before conducting the actual data collection process. Any identifiable issue was eliminated to ascertain confidentiality. Furthermore, appropriate infection prevention practices and principles related to COVID-19 were considered during the data collection process. After the interview was completed, data collectors provided health education about the identified gaps for the households.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mekonnen, H.S., Azagew, A.W., Wubneh, C.A. et al. Community’s misconception about COVID-19 and its associated factors among Gondar town residents, Northwest Ethiopia. Trop Med Health 48, 99 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00279-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00279-8

Keywords

Tropical Medicine and Health

ISSN: 1349-4147

Contact us