Open Access

Tumor infiltrating leukocyte density is independent of tumor grade and molecular subtype in aggressive breast cancer of Western Kenya

  • Rispah T. Sawe1, 2, 3, 4Email author,
  • Simeon K. Mining1,
  • Ayub V. Ofulla^2,
  • Kirtika Patel1,
  • Bernard Guyah2,
  • David Chumba1,
  • Jenifer R. Prosperi3, 4, 5, 7,
  • Maggie Kerper3, 4,
  • Zonggao Shi3, 4,
  • Mayra Sandoval-Cooper3, 4,
  • Katherine Taylor3, 6,
  • Sunil Badve4, 5,
  • M. Sharon Stack3, 4 and
  • Laurie E. Littlepage3, 4
^Deceased
Tropical Medicine and Health201745:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-017-0059-4

Received: 28 March 2017

Accepted: 28 June 2017

Published: 4 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Tumors commonly are infiltrated by leukocytes, or tumor infiltrating leukocytes (TILs). It remains unclear, however, if the density and type of individual TILs has a direct or simply correlative role in promoting poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. Breast cancer in Kenyan women is aggressive with presentation at a young age, with advanced grade (grade III), large tumor size (>2.0 cm), and poor prognosis. We previously observed that the tumors were predominantly estrogen receptor positive (ER+) but also included both a high percentage of triple negative tumors and also increased immune cell infiltration within the tumors. We used breast tumor tissues from each patient to make tissue microarrays that were then stained for leukocyte and myeloid markers including CD4, CD8, CD20, CD25, CD68, and CD163 using immunohistochemical techniques. The immune cell infiltration into the cancer tissue included increased numbers of macrophages (CD68+), helper T cells (CD4+), and CD25+ lymphocytes compared to benign tissue.

Results

This study characterized the grade, molecular subtypes, and proliferation index of these tumors and determined if TIL density was enriched across any of these factors. We analyzed 49 malignant patient tissue samples for this study. The patient population had a mean age of 51.9 years. The tumors analyzed were heterogeneous by grade: grade I (6%), grade II (47%), and grade III (39%). Most patients presented with large tumors (>2.0 cm) (69%). We classified the tumors into molecular subtypes based on clinical marker expression. Based on this analysis, the molecular subtype distribution was heterogeneous with luminal B (41%), basal/triple negative (TN) (37%), luminal A (14%) and HER2 (8%) breast cancer subtypes. While the basal/TN subtype had a much higher proliferative index (Ki-67+) than did the other molecular subtypes, we did not see a significant correlation between TIL density and either subtype or tumor grade. Therefore, TIL density is independent of molecular subtype and grade.

Conclusion

This study identified a Kenyan patient cohort that develops large, high-grade tumors primarily of the luminal B and basal molecular subtypes. After analyzing the TILs within these tumors, we found that immune cell infiltration of these tumors correlated with increased proliferation but not grade or molecular subtype. Future research is required to determine if the aberrant recruitment of TILs to tumors contributes to cancer progression and response to cancer treatments.

Keywords

Tumor infiltrating leukocytes (TILs)Aggressive breast cancerBreast cancer subtypesAdvancedAfricanKenyan

Background

Ideally, the immune system destroys and inhibits cancer. In contrast, suppression of the immune response can instead promote tumor progression, given the proper context. Recent research has led to increased development and application of immunotherapy, which modulates the immune response, as a cancer treatment [1, 2]. However, the classification of the ability of an immune cell to promote or inhibit cancer progression can be difficult because the immune cell function can be influenced by the microenvironment, which includes other immune cells. Indeed, tumor infiltrating leukocytes (TILs) can be classified as activated, regulatory, or anergic [3].

Both the TIL type and density contribute to the host immune response to breast cancer [3]. In cancer, infiltration of effector T cells correlates with better prognosis [46]. In contrast, infiltration of CD25+ lymphocytes promotes tumor growth and progression by suppressing the effector function of cytotoxic cells [7]. Also, CD4+ T cells in tumors have cellular plasticity with both anti- and pro-tumor roles [8].

In African patients, breast cancer is diagnosed at a young age and is aggressive, with tumors that are of advanced grade, large in size, and a high rate of triple negative (TN; estrogen receptor negative, ER−; progesterone receptor negative, PR−; and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, HER2−) [911]. The cause of this aggressive cancer has not been elucidated but may be related to the immune response of these patients. Our previous study found that breast cancers of patients in Kenya had increased immune cell infiltration, as indicated by increased recruitment of CD163+ (M2 macrophage), CD25+ lymphocytes, and CD4+ (T helper) cells compared to non-cancer tissue [12].

The immune response in breast cancer patients can have predictive therapeutic value, especially with response to chemotherapy [13]. The presence of or the ratio comparing specific TILs within a tumor may represent immune homeostasis within the tumor and the tumor microenvironment [1]. Although the role and mechanism of the individual TILs in the clinical and biological behavior of tumor are unclear, TILs seem to have predictive value for breast tumors in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) [2, 14]. We previously found increased tumor infiltration of CD25+ lymphocytes in high-grade tumors, which may play a role in suppressing the adaptive immune response leading to poor prognosis in this type of tumors, and modulating these cells could manage aggressive breast cancer types [12]. Other cells, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells in breast cancer (MDSCs), also may have suppressive action on effector cells by making them immunotherapeutic agents [15].

The variable density and type of immune cells localized to breast tumors may trigger aberrant immune responses in these patients. The heterogeneity of recruited immune cells to the tumors may vary between cancer subtypes, suggesting that different immune cell populations may contribute to tumor suppression or other mechanisms of disease progression or subtype [16]. Alternatively, immune cell recruitment and heterogeneity may be an independent marker of disease progression that may be even more relevant to prognosis and/or treatment. The tumor grade and molecular subtypes of these tumors as well as the level of recruitment of TILs within tumors of certain subtypes were not investigated in our previous study [12]. Therefore, it remains unclear if the TILs that are recruited to the tumors are potential markers that correlate with the molecular subtype or are independent markers of the host immune response. The current study determined if immune cell infiltration into the breast tumors from Kenyan patients might be related to breast cancer subtype and/or tumor grade. Understanding the pattern and function of immune cell infiltration in aggressive tumors of African women is an important strategy to better understand the progression of these tumors. Identifying the significance of the recruitment of these cells in the tumors could form the basis for the identification of markers that represent the host’s immune response.

Methods

Study design

This prospective study used consecutively collected breast tumor samples that have been described previously [12]. Briefly, all patients with histologically diagnosed breast cancer who consented to participation in this study, who met the inclusion criteria, and were diagnosed and treated at the MTRH oncology clinic between May 2011 and July 2013 were included in this study (N = 68). Patients were included in the study if they had pathologically confirmed breast cancer with no history of chemotherapy. Patients were excluded from this study if they had benign tumors, if they did not consent to participation in the study, if they had a history of cancer prior to the study, or if they used chemotherapy prior to the study. Tissue microarrays generated from these tumors (described below) were stained for the described molecular markers. Of the tumor samples on the tissue microarrays, 49 tumor samples had interpretable staining for all of the indicated markers. Samples from these 49 patients are the samples analyzed and described in this paper. This study adhered to appropriate ethical standards in accordance with approved IRBs from both the University of Notre Dame (IRB Approval # 13-06-1102) and Moi University (IRB Approval # 000655).

Tissue processing

Specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and then processed through dehydration, xylene, and paraffin infiltration steps in an automatic tissue processor Leica TP 1020 (Leica microsystems Nussloch Gmbh Heidelbeger Sitr. 17-19 D-69226 Nussloch Germany). The blocks were transferred from MTRH to Notre Dame, where the samples were re-embedded into melted paraplast X-tra (McCormick Scientific). Thin sections (3 μm) of tissue samples were cut using rotary microtone (Letz 1512) equipped with disposable blades and stained by hematoxylin and eosin and then analyzed by pathologists.

Construction of tissue microarrays

We made tissue microarrays (TMAs) of the breast tissue samples [12]. As described, the tissue cores were punched from donor blocks with a 1-mm-diameter stylus and loaded to recipient paraffin blocks. The design of the TMAs made it possible to evaluate the frequency of markers across tumor grades and molecular subtypes from patient tumors. The TMA layout on the recipient TMA blocks was designed in advance to include duplicates of each tissue sample and to organize the tissue samples randomly across the TMAs. Tissue regions were selected and included in the TMA based on the pathology of the tissue determined from the H&E-stained slides of each tissue block. The TMA blocks were constructed with a Veridiam Advanced Tissue Arrayer VTA-110CC. Blocks were sectioned at 3 μm thickness with Leica rotary microtome RM2125. Each of the two TMAs used for the staining had ~100 tissues per block with duplicates of each tissue sample included across the two TMAs.

For breast cancer tissue TMAs, including two or more tissue punches of 1-mm core diameter is preferred over a single punch or larger punch are more consistent and representative of the entire tumor [17, 18].

Immunohistochemistry

Tissue sections were dewaxed by placing the sections on IHC slides at 60 °C for 30 min followed by processing the samples through three incubations with xylene and then alcohol. After deparaffinization and rehydration in water, the tissues were treated for heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER). A working solution was prepared by diluting the Envision™ FLEX target retrieval solution (50×) concentration 1:50 in distilled water. Pretreatment module (PT link) was then filled with sufficient quantity (1.5 L) of working solution to cover the tissue sections, and then was set to pre-heat the solution to 65 °C. Tissue sections that were already deparaffinized and rehydrated were immersed to pre-heated Envision Flex target retrieval solution and incubated for 20 min at 97 °C. Then, the sections were left to cool in the PT link to 65 °C.

Each slide rack was removed from the PT link tank and immediately dipped the slides into a jar with a diluted room temperature FLEX TM wash buffer (20×) and left for 1–5 min. Slides were then stained on a Dako autostainer Plus (Dako Colorado, Inc).

The primary antibodies used for our analysis include antibodies that recognize estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), Ki-67, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, CD163, and CD25 (Table 1). The secondary antibodies used include EnVision™ Flex+Mouse (Linker), (Dako) SM804; EnVision™ Flex Peroxidase-Blocking Reagent (Dako) SM801; EnVision™ Flex/HRP (Dako) SM802; EnVision™ Flex Antibody Diluent (Dako) DM830; and Hercep Test™ Peroxidase-Blocking Reagent (Dako) SK001. The choice of these markers is supported by the recommendations by the International TILs Working Group 2014, who advocates the scoring of most mononuclear cells but excluding polymorphonuclear leukocytes [16].
Table 1

List of primary antibodies

Antibody

Vendor/clone

Pretreatment

Dilution

Control tissue

Detection/linker

Incubation time (minutes)

ER

Dako IR084

TRS high pH

RTU

Breast Ca

Flex

20/20/10

PR

DakoIR068

TRS low pH

RTU

Breast Ca

Flex + M

20/20/20/10

HER2

Dako SK001

Herceptest antigen retrieval

 

Herceptest

Herceptest

30/30/10

Ki-67

DakoIR626

TRS high pH

RTU

Breast

Flex

20/20/10

CD4

DakoIR649

TRS high pH

RTU

Tonsil

Flex + M

15/10/10/10

CD8

DakoIR623

TRS low pH

RTU

Tonsil

Flex + M

15/15/15/10

CD68KPI

DakoIR609

TRS high pH

RTU

Tonsil

Flex

20/10/10

CD20

DakoIR604

TRS high pH

RTU

Tonsil

Flex

10/10/10

CD25

NC NCLCD25-305

TRS high pH

1:100

Tonsil

Flex + M

15/10/10/10

CD163

Vector Laboratories Inc.VP6017007

TRS high pH

1:100

Bone Marrow

Flex + M

15/10/10/10

Quality control

A known positive control specimen was used in each staining run to ascertain a proper performance of all the applied reagents. If a positive control specimen failed to demonstrate positive staining, labeling of test specimens were considered invalid hence repeated.

For a negative control, secondary antibody without primary antibody was used to identify any nonspecific staining. If the nonspecific staining was not clearly differentiated from the specific staining of the test specimen that test was considered invalid.

Image analysis

IHC images were quantified with Aperio Image Analysis Tools software using customized macros from the Color Deconvolution and Cell Quantification algorithms in the Aperio Image Analysis Tools software to analyze each DAB chromogen-stained tissue section. One representative area from each tissue core of the stained tissue sections was manually selected with ImageScope annotation tools and assigned with a position code on the TMA layout for easy identification. After marking all the regions of interest on a TMA IHC slide, analysis with a proper macro was run and the output results were exported as an Excel file for further data organization and processing.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was completed using GraphPad Prism 6.0. Descriptive statistics were used in summarizing statistical results. Ki-67 and TIL markers were compared across grades and molecular subtype by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison tests. Controls and those that did not have either grade data or the appropriate staining information to classify the samples by molecular subtype were excluded in the analysis. Level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Grade and molecular subtype determination of Kenyan breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to begin to determine the significance of the immune cell infiltration that we previously described in a prospective study of a breast cancer patient population from Eldoret, Kenya [12]. In this study, we compare the immune cell infiltration with known molecular subtypes and tumor grade to determine if these are interrelated or independent markers. To do this, we used immunohistochemistry quantification data of clinical markers (receptor expression and proliferation marker Ki-67 status), TIL density, and pathology that we described previously [12] (Table 1). We also further investigated the grade and molecular subtype of these tumor samples.

Of our malignant patient tissue sample collection (N = 68), 49 of these samples were determined to have been stained and analyzed for expression of all of the markers described in the current study [12]. These 49 samples were used in the analysis for the current study. At presentation of disease, the patients included in our study had an average age of 51.9 years old and median age of 48.5 years old (standard deviation, 17.3) (Table 2).
Table 2

Demographics and clinical characteristics of the study group (N = 53)

Variable

Number

Percentage

Mean age at diagnosis, 51.9 years

Median age at diagnosis, 48.5 years

Standard deviation, 17.3

Tumor grade

 I

3

6

 II

23

47

 III

19

39

 Not graded

4

8

Tumor size (cm)

 ≤2

8

31

 2.1–5

11

42

 >5

7

27

ER

 Positive

29

59

 Negative

20

41

PR

 Positive

19

40

 Negative

29

60

HER2

 Positive (3)

7

14

 Negative (0–2)

42

86

Ki-67

 <14% (low)

6

12

 ≥14% (high)

43

88

Most of the patients presented with large tumors (>2.0 cm) (69%) that were primarily ER positive (ER+ 59%), PR negative (PR− 60%), and HER2 negative (HER2− 86%) by immunohistochemistry (Table 2). The tumors were highly proliferative (88%), as determined by a high percentage of Ki-67 positively stained cells. In addition, the grade of the tumors analyzed was heterogeneous: grade I (6%), grade II (47%), and grade III (39%).

We classified each patient tumor into a molecular subtype based on the expression of clinical markers (Table 3). The molecular breast cancer subtypes were identified as described previously [19]. The luminal B (41%) and basal/triple negative (TN) breast cancer subtypes (37%) included the majority of the tumors. Luminal A (14%) and HER2 (8%) subtype tumors were less frequent. This distribution is similar to that seen in other African populations [9, 10]. These data also are comparable to reports from the USA and western countries [20, 21].
Table 3

Molecular subtypes

Variable

Characteristics

N (%)

Luminal A

ER+ and/or PR+, HER2−, low Ki-67

7 (14)

Luminal B

ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+ (or HER2− with high Ki-67)

20 (41)

Her2

ER− and/or PR-, Her2 + Any Ki-67

4 (8)

Basal/triple negative

ER−, PR−, HER2− and any Ki-67

18 (37)

ER+/- estrogen receptor positive or negative, PR+/- progesterone receptor positive or negative, HER2 +/- human epidermal growth factor positive or negative

Proliferation varies by molecular subtypes

In breast cancer, proliferation as marked by high expression of Ki-67 varies by subtype [19, 2224]. Breast cancers with high proliferation (proliferative marker Ki-67 ≥14%) are associated with poor patient prognosis [25]. We examined proliferation within the tumor subtypes and grades. Ki-67 varied across the molecular subtypes (p = 0.0009; Kruskal-Wallis) and was enriched most significantly in the basal/TN molecular subtype and in ER-negative tumors (Fig. 1). This suggests that basal/TN tumors and ER negative had a higher proliferative capacity than did the other subtypes. In contrast, Ki-67 did not significantly vary across grades (p = 0.1241) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Ki-67 status in Kenyan breast tumors by molecular subtype and grade. Breast cancer tissue samples were stained for Ki-67 and scored for percent Ki-67-positive cells. Ki-67 status then was compared across molecular subtype (a) by Kruskal-Wallis (P = 0.0009) followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison tests, ER status (b) by Mann-Whitney (P = 0.006), and grade (c) by Mann-Whitney (P = 0.1241) (the P value is indicated by * and ** for P < 0.05 and P<0.01, respectively)

We next determined if the TIL infiltration densities were related to the proliferative capacity of the tumors by comparing TIL density with Ki-67 proliferation index. We found statistical significance in the correlation between Ki-67 status and CD68, CD163, and CD25 with a similar trend for CD4 (Fig. 2). These data suggest that these immune cells in particular are related to the high proliferative capacity of the tumors.
Fig. 2

Ki-67 and TIL density correlate in breast tumors from Kenya. Breast cancer tissue samples were stained for TILs, including CD68, CD163, CD4, CD8, CD20, and CD25. Each sample was scored for percentage of positively stained area for the indicated TIL. The Ki-67 positively stained areas/nuclei then were compared across TIL expression levels of CD68 a, CD163 b, CD4 c, CD8 d, CD20 e, and CD25 f by Spearman correlation (P = 0.02, 0.003, 0.057, 0.16, 0.52, and 0.0096 with r = 0.3419, 0.4023, 0.2741, 0.2140, 0.09378, and 0.3704, respectively)

Proliferation and tumor infiltrating leukocytes (TILs) in relation to molecular subtypes

To determine if the immune response actually contributes to the aggressive phenotypes commonly seen in this patient population and that are represented by subtypes, we determined if the levels of immune cell infiltrates correlated with grade and molecular subtypes of breast cancer. We determined if proliferation and individual TILs localized to the tumor tissue were enriched within particular breast cancer molecular subtypes. We found no statistical significance between the density of TILs across grades (Fig. 3) or across the different molecular subtypes (Fig. 4). This suggests that the TIL density does not correlate with molecular subtype or grade and that immune cell infiltration is not simply a surrogate for grade or subtype. Instead, TIL infiltration is an independent marker and another factor, which currently is unknown, must cause the changes in the immune response and correlate with the data.
Fig. 3

The density of TILs does not differ between tumor grades in breast tumors from Kenya. Breast cancer tissue samples were stained for TILs, including CD68, CD163, CD4, CD8, CD20, and CD25. Each sample was scored for percentage of positively stained area for the indicated TIL. The positively stained areas then were compared across tumor grades 1 & 2 and 3 by Mann-Whitney CD68 a, CD163 b, CD4 c, CD8 d, CD20 e, and CD25 f (P = 0.98, 0.56, 0.73, 0.29, 0.68, and 0.47, respectively). The stained area did not significantly vary by grade

Fig. 4

The density of TILs does not differ between molecular subtypes in breast tumors from Kenya. Breast cancer tissue samples were stained for TILs, including CD68, CD163, CD4, CD8, CD20, and CD25. Each sample was scored for percentage of positively stained area for the indicated TIL. The positively stained area then was compared across molecular subtypes basal/TN, HER2, luminal A, and luminal B. The positively stained areas then were compared across molecular subtypes basal/TN, HER2, luminal A, and luminal B by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison tests CD68 a, CD163 b, CD4 c, CD8 d, CD20 e, and CD25 f (P = 0.1187, 0.3502, 0.0898, 0.6775, 0.1376, and 0.3128, respectively). The stained areas did not significantly vary by molecular subtype

Discussion

This prospective study determined that TIL infiltration is an independent marker of breast cancer in these tumors. Our results indicate that TIL infiltration is independent of grade and subtype. In our previous study, we began to characterize the breast cancer seen in patients in Western Kenya. We discovered that these tumors were aggressive with high proliferation and increased immune cell infiltration [12]. In this study, we further classified the grade and molecular subtype of tissue from Kenyan breast cancer patients treated in a regional hospital setting and evaluated TILs as an independent marker of breast cancer in these patients. Using immunohistochemistry molecular markers, we classified these tumors by molecular subtypes. These tumors are heterogeneous with most tumors classified as luminal B (41%) and basal/TN (37%) subtypes. To further study the immune cell infiltration, we determined if the density of individual TILs varied across molecular subtypes and grade or was independent of these. Our results indicate that TIL densities did not significantly correlate with the cancer subtype and tumor grade. Therefore, while immune cell infiltration significantly correlates with malignancy in these tumors, this infiltration is independent of the molecular subtype or tumor grade.

Even though in our study we saw no significant difference in immune cell infiltration in tumors across most molecular subtypes, the individual TILs could hold clinical value as a marker that is independent of subtype and instead applicable across all subtypes but specific to treatment (e.g., chemotherapy-resistant tumors). In breast cancer, infiltration of breast tumors by effector T cells correlates with better prognosis [5, 6, 26]. In contrast, infiltration of CD25+ regulatory T cells promotes tumor growth and progression by suppressing the effector function of cytotoxic cells [7]. Also, CD4+ T cells in tumors have plasticity and have both anti- and pro-tumor roles [8]. In contrast to our current study, which finds no significant differences in immune cell density between tumor grades, other studies demonstrate differential lymphocyte infiltration in breast cancer tissues based on histological grade, with infiltration by CD4+ and CD8+ Th1 effector cells in lower grade tumors [3, 27]. However, the immune cell heterogeneity and, more specifically, the ratio of immune cells to other immune cells within a tumor may be critical in identifying any contribution of these cells to patient prognosis.

One limitation of this study could be the use of TMAs rather than the entire tissue sections for TIL and molecular marker analysis. However, we have tried to mitigate this concern by using multiple tissue punches per tissue sample per TMA. When using TMAs of breast cancer tissue, including two or more tissue punches of 1-mm core diameter is preferred and is shown to be more consistent and representative of the entire tumor compared to either a single punch or a larger 2-mm core punch [17, 18]. In our analysis, we included duplicate tissue punches (1-mm core diameter) from each tumor sample to increase the likelihood that the data was representative of the entire tissue. In addition, our analysis scored the number of TILs per cancer tissue and immediately adjacent stroma on a TMA but did not include TMA samples that were predominantly stromal tissue, rather than a cancer-cell-containing tissue. This approach might self-select for a subset of the TIL population and could more appropriately be analyzed by flow cytometry analysis from fresh tissues of single-cell suspensions that are stained and analyzed for TIL markers. However, this option was not available for this study.

The small sample size was a limitation of this study. Our patient population included very few tumors classified as HER2 positive (14%) by immunohistochemistry or as HER2 (8%) by molecular subtype (Tables 2 and 3). For example, due to the small numbers of HER2+ samples, we are unable to draw conclusions about the Ki-67 status of HER2+ tumors within our patient cohort. However, for most other analysis of our data, our patient cohort is sufficiently large to have statistical power. In addition, our breast cancer patient sample size is comparable to other breast cancer studies from Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania [2830]. In fact, a large meta-analysis of African breast cancer studies did not find a small study bias in the studies analyzed from sub-Saharan Africa, which includes Kenya [31]. In comparison to these other studies, our study was strengthened by being a prospective study and by not being a convenience sample.

Our data do not rule out the possibility of TILs having a prognostic role in breast cancer progression or a predictive role in response to therapy, since our study did not include patient outcome or therapeutic response data. This study will form the basis for future prognostic studies in African breast cancer patient populations. Since a significant percentage of Kenyan breast cancer patients present with aggressive breast tumors and have poor prognosis, these patients may not benefit from standard therapies and may require alternative therapies, such as immune therapy. For example, the significant population of patients with TN breast cancer has limited treatment options. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease often characterized by aggressive biology and poor prognosis. Efforts to precisely treat TNBC have been compounded by the lack of specific therapeutic molecular targets. Also, in westernized treatment facilities, patients with HER2+ tumors generally are treated with trastuzumab. However, the Kenyan community has limited resources to provide expensive trastuzumab treatment in such a setting where most patients have few treatment options; treatment options will depend on markers that accurately will predict response to treatment. Interestingly, CD8+ and CD25+ could be such markers, since TILs are associated with improved distant metastases-free survival as well as increased rates of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive breast tumors [6, 32]. In addition, including Ki-67 in the standard pathological assessment could help to identify and treat aggressive tumors as early as possible.

Since we identify TIL density as being independent of grade and subtype but correlative with proliferation, this study remains consistent with our hypothesis that the TIL infiltrate may be a reasonable marker of immune response, thus suggesting immune modulators as potential therapies that may have efficacy in treating Kenyan breast cancer patients. Future studies will determine the role of immune cell infiltrates in a patient’s response to treatment. Since chemotherapy is the primary line of therapy for treatment-resistant breast cancers, alternative immunomodulatory treatments may be the second-line therapies for these patients. By understanding the immune response generated by the tumors, we may better understand which immunotherapy treatment options would be relevant to treating these tumors. Understanding the pattern and function of immune cell infiltrates in aggressive tumors of African women is a step towards identifying the critical immune cells that could be therapeutic targets in this population and could be suggestive of potential therapeutic strategies aimed at reprogramming the immune response in this patient population.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we report that in the tumors of our described Kenyan breast cancer patient cohort, immune cell infiltration measured by the cell type and density of tumor infiltrating leukocytes in breast tumors correlates with increased proliferation. However, TIL infiltration does not significantly vary by breast cancer molecular subtypes or by grade. Future studies that collect both additional breast tumor samples as well as longitudinal survival data from patients will be required to determine the prognostic value of our findings.

Notes

Abbreviations

ER: 

Estrogen receptor

Her2/neu receptor HER2: 

Human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor

IHC: 

Immunohistochemistry

MDSCs: 

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells

MTRH: 

Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital

NCT: 

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

pCR: 

Pathological complete response

PR: 

Progesterone receptor

TILs: 

Tumor infiltrating leukocytes

TMAs: 

Tissue microarrays

TNBC: 

Triple negative breast cancer

Tregs: 

Regulatory T cells

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Emilia Hartland, Lacey Haussamen Ahern, and Andy Bullock for the ongoing support and encouragement; Laura Tarwater for Aperio scanning and support; Frank Castellino, Victoria Ploplis, and the University of Notre Dame W. M. Keck Center for Transgene Research for offering the initial histological support; and Cecelia Dodson for assisting immunohistochemistry staining. We thank the following institutions and institutes for supporting this work: Maseno University, Harper Cancer Research Institute, Eck Institute, University of Notre Dame, Moi University, Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Eldoret, and Indiana University Pathology Department. This work was supported by a grant support from the Walther Foundation and the St. Joseph Regional Medical Center as well as the institutional support from Harper Cancer Research Institute, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Moi University Teaching and Referral University, and Maseno University. L.E.L. is supported by an Indiana CTSI Young Investigator Award, the American Cancer Society, the S.A.S. Foundation for Cancer Research, NIH/NCI (R33 CA206922), and a grant from the Mary Kay Foundation.

Funding

This work was supported by the Walther Foundation for Cancer Research, Harper Cancer Research Institute, Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Moi University Teaching and Referral University, and Maseno University.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used for analysis during the current study are either published previously [12] or are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

RTS collected the tissue samples and the clinical data. RTS, SB, JP, AO, KT, MSS, SM, and LEL made substantial contributions to the conception and design of this project. MK and RTS embedded the tissues, made the tissue microarrays, and sectioned the tissues. MS, MK, and ZS scanned and collected the data and took pictures using Aperio. SB led the pathology analysis. DC and ZS also analyzed the pathology of the tumors. RTS and LEL did the statistical analysis. LEL built the figures and analyzed and interpreted the quantitative data. RTS, BG, KP, and LEL wrote the manuscript. RTS, SB, MS, JP, ZS, MSS, and LEL critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics and Review Committee of Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) and the University of Notre Dame Institutional Review Board and was conducted according to the principles in the Declaration of Helsinki (Deutsch 1989).

Patients with histologically diagnosed breast cancer at the MTRH were included in the study after giving their informed consent and have been described previously [12].

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Immunology, Moi University, College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine
(2)
Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health and Community Development, Maseno University
(3)
University of Notre Dame
(4)
Harper Cancer Research Institute
(5)
Indiana University School of Medicine
(6)
Eck Institute for Global Health
(7)
Indiana University School of Medicine - South Bend

References

  1. Loi S, Sirtaine N, Piette F, Salgado R, Viale G, Van Eenoo F, Rouas G, Francis P, Crown JP, Hitre E, De Azambuja E. Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial in node-positive breast cancer comparing the addition of docetaxel to doxorubicin with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: BIG 02-98. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(7):860–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Denkert C, Huober J, Loibl S, Prinzler J, Kronenwett R, Darb-Esfahani S, Brase JC, Solbach C, Mehta K, Fasching PA, Sinn BV. HER2 and ESR1 mRNA expression levels and response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(1):R11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Krell J, Frampton AE, Stebbing J. The clinical significance of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: does subtype matter? BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):135.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, Lagorce-Pagès C, Tosolini M, Camus M, Berger A, Wind P, Zinzindohoué F. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science. 2006;313(5795):1960–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. DeNardo DG, Brennan DJ, Rexhepaj E, Ruffell B, Shiao SL, Madden SF, Gallagher WM, Wadhwani N, Keil SD, Junaid SA, Rugo HS. Leukocyte complexity predicts breast cancer survival and functionally regulates response to chemotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2011;1(1):54–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Loi S, Michiels S, Salgado R, Sirtaine N, Jose V, Fumagalli D, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Bono P, Kataja V, Desmedt C, Piccart MJ. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are prognostic in triple negative breast cancer and predictive for trastuzumab benefit in early breast cancer: results from the FinHER trial. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(8):1544–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Nedergaard BS, Ladekarl M, Thomsen HF, Nyengaard JR, Nielsen K. Low density of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells is associated with increased risk of relapse in squamous cell cervical cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;97(8):1135–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Sharma MD, Hou DY, Liu Y, Koni PA, Metz R, Chandler P, Mellor AL, He Y, Munn DH. Indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase controls conversion of Foxp3+ Tregs to TH17-like cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Blood. 2009;113(24):6102–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Huo D, Ikpatt F, Khramtsov A, Dangou JM, Nanda R, Dignam J, Zhang B, Grushko T, Zhang C, Oluwasola O, Malaka D. Population differences in breast cancer: survey in indigenous African women reveals over-representation of triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(27):4515–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Adebamowo CA, Famooto A, Ogundiran TO, Aniagwu T, Nkwodimmah C, Akang EE. Immunohistochemical and molecular subtypes of breast cancer in Nigeria. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110(1):183–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Galukande M, Wabinga H, Mirembe F, Karamagi C, Asea A. Difference in risk factors for breast cancer by ER status in an indigenous African population. ISRN Oncol. 2013;25:2013.Google Scholar
  12. Sawe RT, Kerper M, Badve S, Li J, Sandoval-Cooper M, Xie J, Shi Z, Patel K, Chumba D, Ofulla A, Prosperi J. Aggressive breast cancer in western Kenya has early onset, high proliferation, and immune cell infiltration. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):204.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. García-Martínez E, Gil GL, Benito AC, González-Billalabeitia E, Conesa MA, García TG, García-Garre E, Vicente V, de la Peña FA. Tumor-infiltrating immune cell profiles and their change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict response and prognosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(6):488.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Ono M, Tsuda H, Shimizu C, Yamamoto S, Shibata T, Yamamoto H, Hirata T, Yonemori K, Ando M, Tamura K, Katsumata N. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are correlated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132(3):793–805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Markowitz J, Wesolowski R, Papenfuss T, Brooks TR, Carson WE. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140(1):13–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Salgado R, Denkert C, Demaria S, Sirtaine N, Klauschen F, Pruneri G, Wienert S, Van den Eynden G, Baehner FL, Penault-Llorca F, Perez EA. The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(2):259–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Saxena R, Badve S. Tissue microarray—construction and quality assurance. In: Kumar GJ, Rudbeck R, editors. Education guide/immunohistochemical staining methods, vol. 5. 2009. chap 7:46.Google Scholar
  18. Badve SS, Baehner FL, Gray RP, Childs BH, Maddala T, Liu ML, Rowley SC, Shak S, Perez ED, Shulman LJ, Martino S. Estrogen-and progesterone-receptor status in ECOG 2197: comparison of immunohistochemistry by local and central laboratories and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction by central laboratory. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(15):2473–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Voduc KD, Cheang MC, Tyldesley S, Gelmon K, Nielsen TO, Kennecke H. Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):1684–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, Karaca G, Troester MA, Tse CK, Edmiston S, Deming SL. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 2006;295(21):2492–502.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ihemelandu CU, Leffall LD, Dewitty RL, Naab TJ, Mezghebe HM, Makambi KH, Adams-Campbell L, Frederick WA. Molecular breast cancer subtypes in premenopausal and postmenopausal African-American women: age-specific prevalence and survival. J Surg Res. 2007;143(1):109–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Morris GJ, Naidu S, Topham AK, Guiles F, Xu Y, McCue P, Schwartz GF, Park PK, Rosenberg AL, Brill K, Mitchell EP. Differences in breast carcinoma characteristics in newly diagnosed African–American and Caucasian patients. Cancer. 2007;110(4):876–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Cheang MCU, Chia SK, Voduc D, Gao D, Leung S, Snider J, et al. Ki-67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:736–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Cuzick J, Dowsett M, Pineda S, Wale C, Salter J, Quinn E, Zabaglo L, Mallon E, Green AR, Ellis IO, Howell A. Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the Genomic Health recurrence score in early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(32):4273–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Keam B, Im SA, Lee KH, Han SW, Oh DY, Kim JH, Lee SH, Han W, Kim DW, Kim TY, Park IA. Ki-67 can be used for further classification of triple negative breast cancer into two subtypes with different response and prognosis. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(2):R22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Galon J, Pagès F, Marincola FM, Thurin M, Trinchieri G, Fox BA, Gajewski TF, Ascierto PA. The immune score as a new possible approach for the classification of cancer. J Transl Med. 2012;10(1):1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Matkowski R, Gisterek I, Halon A, Lacko A, Szewczyk K, Staszek U, Pudelko M, Szynglarewicz B, Szelachowska J, Zolnierek A, Kornafel J. The prognostic role of tumor-infiltrating CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes in breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(7):2445–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Roy I, Othieno E. Breast carcinoma in Uganda: microscopic study and receptor profile of 45 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135(2):194–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nalwoga H, Arnes JB, Wabinga H, Akslen LA. Frequency of the basal-like phenotype in African breast cancer. APMIS. 2007;115(12):1391–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Burson AM, Soliman AS, Ngoma TA, Mwaiselage J, Ogweyo P, Eissa MS, Dey S, Merajver SD. Clinical and epidemiologic profile of breast cancer in Tanzania. Breast Dis. 2010;31(1):33–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Eng A, McCormack V, dos-Santos-Silva I. Receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer in indigenous populations in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001720.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Denkert C, Loibl S, Noske A, Roller M, Müller BM, Komor M, Budczies J, Darb Esfahani S, Kronenwett R, Hanusch C, von Törne C. Tumor-associated lymphocytes as an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(1):105–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement